Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 8 no. 1 (2023)

Challenges to Coping Mechanism of Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education (Alive) Teachers in Using Modular and Handheld Radio Learning Modalities

Amaniya Maraye Potawan | Erlinda Basmayor

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The key purpose of this research was to find out the profile of the respondents who were the Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education (ALIVE) teachers of Madalum Central Elementary School in terms of their age and gender; the challenges they encountered in terms of content, input, process, and product, the coping mechanisms employed; and the significant relationship between the challenges and coping mechanisms of the ALIVE teachers. An action plan was created to provide a solution to the problems encountered. This study employed the descriptive-correlation research design which used questionnaire data. The descriptive research described the challenges and coping mechanisms of ALIVE Teachers in the new normal and performance of pupils in Arabic language and Islamic values. There were 30 ALIVE teachers from Mandalum Central Elementary School who were respondents in this study. The data were collected, analyzed, and interpreted by using mean, and standard deviation. The results had shown that there was no significant relationship between the challenges and coping mechanisms. The researcher of this study made an action plan to make the educational process more effective and easier to comply with.



References:

  1. ACCRALAW. The new normal in basic education. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f4c146a9-7ef0-4bc1-8d6d-e6516a4a14ff. Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M, Davis, A., Hall Glesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horicon report 2017 higher education edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.
  2. Alfonso, G.J (2012, August). UP open university: Thoughts about opening in a digitized world [PowerPoint slides]. Presentation at the UPOU Roundtable Discussion, UPOU Oblation Hall, Los Banos, Laguna.
  3. Allen, I.E & Seaman, J. (2003). Sizing the opportunity. The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003.
  4. Allen,I,E, & Seaman,J., Poulin, R & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. 1-4.
  5. Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 12(3):80-97.
  6. Arento P. (2016). Must and challenges is open distance and learning in perspective from the Philippines. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 1 Number4.
  7. Arum, R, Roksa, J., & Cook, A, (2016). Improving quality in American higher education: Learning outcomes and assessments for the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.
  9. CHED. (2020). CHED COVID19 ADVISORY NO. 3.
  10. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Jurgens, R, Malkawi, B. H., Glowats, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries higher education intra period digital pedagogy response j o u r n a l of a p p l i e d l e a r n i n g & t e a c h i n g . http://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  11. Davis, D., & Meares, D. (Eds). (2001). Transnational education: Australia online – critical factors for success. Sydney: IDP Education Australia.
  12. Debowski, S. (2003). Lost in internationalized space: The challenge of sustaining academics teaching offshore. 17th IDP Australian International Education Conference, Securing the future for international education. Melbourne, Australia.
  13. De Fever, A. (1977). Radio in agricultural extension in developing countries. Educational Television International. 1971, 4, 124-27.
  14. DepEd. (2020). Official statement Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020.05/06/official-statement-2 DO No. 40, s. 2011, Amendment to DO No. 51, s. 2004, or the Standard Curriculum for Elementary Public Schools and Private Madaris.
  15. DepEd Order No. 41, s. 2017. Policy Guidelines on Madrasah education in the K to 12 basic education program.
  16. DOH. (2020). Department of Health Philippines.
  17. Dringus, L. P., & A. B. Seagull. (2015). A five-year study of sustaining blended learning initiatives to enhance academic engagement in computer and formation sciences campus course. In Blended Learning: Research perspective Vol. 2. Edited by A. G. Picciano, C. D.
  18. Dziuban, and C.R. Graham, 122-140.New York Routledge. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Hermsdorfer, A., DeCantis, G., Norberg, A., & Bradford, G. (2015). A deconstructions of blended learning presented at the 11th annual Sloan-C- blended learning confidence and workshop.
  19. Emil, B. (2001). Distance learning, access, and opportunity: Equality and e-quality. Metropolitan Universities, 12(1), 19.
  20. Fairlie, R. (2004). Race and the digital divide. The B.E. Journal E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s & P o l k y . 3 ( 1 ) . http://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1263.
  21. Floridie, L. (2014). The 4th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press. Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2013). Blended learning in higher education, (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Print.
  22. Folkman S, Lazarus R. S, Gruen R. J, DeLongis A.(1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986; 50:571–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
  23. Garrison, D. R., & Shale, D. (1987). Mapping the boundaries of distance education: Problems in defining the field. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 7-13.
  24. Gibson, S. & Oberg, D. (2004). Visions and realities of internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology 35 (2004): 569-585. EBSCOHost.15 Sep. 2010.
  25. Global Alliance for Transnational Education [GATE]. (2000). Demand for transnational education in the Asia Pacific. Washington: Global Alliance for Transnational Education.
  26. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education, (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.
  27. Gou, Y.-R., Cao, Q.-D., Hong, Z.-S., Tan, Y.-Y., Chen, S.D., Jin, H.-J., Yan, Y. (2020). The origin, transmission, and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak- an update on the status military. Medical Research . 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0.
  28. Hentea, M., Shea, M. J., & Pennington, L. (2003). A perspective on fulfilling the expectations of distance education. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on information technology education (CITC4 2003), 160-167. Lafayette, Indiana, USA, October 16-18, 2003. ACM Press, New York.
  29. Herrmann, A., Downie, J., & O’Connell, B. (2001). Assessing and evaluating student contribution to electronic discussions. Australian Electronic Journal of Nursing Education, 7(1).
  30. Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the top 10 challenges of blended learning. Top 10 challenges of blended learning. Available on cedma-europe.org.
  31. Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of distance education based on empathy. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 79- 86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  32. Jolly, J. L., & Matthews, M. S. (2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259-290. doi:10.1177/0162353212451703.
  33. Jones, S, Jhonson-yale, C Millermaier, S, & Perez, F. S. (2009). U.S. college student’s internet use: Race.
  34. Karalis, T. (2020). Planning and evaluation during educational disruption: Lessons learned from covid 19 pandemic for treatment and emergencies in education. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3789022.
  35. Kyriacou, C., (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53, (1), 27-35.
  36. Kanuka, H. & Brooks, C. (2010). Distance education in a postFordist time: Negotiating the difference. In M.F. Cleveland –Innes & D.R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction of distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp.69- 90). New York: Rutledge.
  37. Khan, M. I., Khan, A., & Khan, S. (2005). Coping strategies among male & female teachers with high and low job strain. In: A. Hussian, and M.I. Khan, (Eds.), Recent Trends in Human Stress Management.(pp.217-234) Global Vision Publishing House, New Delhi.
  38. Kiser, K. (2002). Is blended best? E-Learning, 3(6), 10
  39. Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Learning, 14(3), 158-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001.
  40. Oliver, R. (2000). Creating meaningful contexts for learning in web-based settings. In Open Learning, 6-8 December 2000, Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Queensland 2000 (pp. 53-61). Brisbane: Learning Network.
  41. Madden, Andrew et al. (2010). Using the internet in teaching: The views of practitioners. British Journal of Educational Technology 36 (2005): 255-280. Wiley Online Library. 9 Sep. 2010.
  42. Marold, K., Larsen, G., & Moreno, A. (2000). Web-based learning: Is it working? Challenges of information technology management in the 21st Century (pp. 350-353). Idea Group Publishing. Hershey, PA.
  43. Marold, K., & Haga, W. (2004). Measuring online students’ ability to apply programing theory: Are web courses working? Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 13(1), 13- 20.
  44. Oliver, M., & Trigwel, K (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? e-Learning, 2(1), 17-25. Pachler, N. & Daily, C (2011). Key Issue in e-learning research and practice. London, UK: Continuum.
  45. Oxford Group, (2013). Blended learning-current use, challenges, and b e s t p r a c t i c e s . F r o m http://www.kineo.com/m/0/blended-learning-report- 202013.pdf.
  46. Ouzts, K. (2006). Sense of community in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 285-296. http://www.infoagepub.com/.
  47. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
  48. Power, M. & Gould-Morven, A. (2011). Head of gold, feet of clay: The online learning paradox. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,12(2),19-39.
  49. Prior, S. (2013). Transition and students with twice-exceptionality. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 19-27. doi:10.1017/jse.2013.3.
  50. Sherron, G. T., & Boettcher, J. V. (1997). Distance learning: The shift to interactivity. CAUSE Professional Paper Series, #17, 1-32. https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/46257245.
  51. Sweeney, J. (1994).New paradigms in teacher evaluation: The SBESD model. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 8(3), 223-237.
  52. Tait, A. (2010). Foreword. In M. F Cleveland- Innes & D.R. Garrison (Eds.). An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  53. Talidong, S.,Wane, R.,Ramos,L. & Tabor, R. (2020). Philippine teachers' practices to deal with anxiety amid covid-19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341168891_Philippine_Teachers'_Practices_to_Deal_with_Anxiety_amid_COVID-1943.
  54. Tria, J. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic through the lens of education i n t h e P h i l i p p i n e s : t h e n e w n o r m a l . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341981898_The_COVID19_Pandemic_through_the_Lens_of_Education_in_the
    _Philippines_The_New_Normal44    .
  55. Tomasic, R. (2002). Guanxi and sustainable teaching and research programs in business and law in the People’s Republic of China Proceedings of the 16th Australian international education conference, Hobart, 2-4 October 2002.
  56. UNESCO. Cultural Radio Broadcasts; Some Experiences. Paris, 1956. UNESCO (2020). COVID-19. Educational disruption and response.
  57. UNESCO: IIEP. Radio and television in the service of education and development in asia. Report #49. Paris, 1967.
  58. Walberg, H. J. A psychological theory of educational productivity. Paper presented at the 1976 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Also in Farley, F. H., and Gordon, N. (Eds), Psychology and Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1981.
  59. Webster, (2016).
  60. WHO. (2020a). R&D blueprint and covid-19
  61. Woldometer, (2020). Coronavirus update (Live). 4,254,131 Cases and 287.257 Deaths From COVID-19 Virus Pandemic – Worldometer
  62. Wyatt, S. (2001). Crossing the boundaries: Overcoming borders and understanding languages. Western Cooperative of Educational Telecommunications (WCET) 13th Annual Conference. Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, Oct 2001.
  63. Ziguras, C. (2000). New frontiers, new technologies, new pedagogies. Educational technology and the internationalization of higher education in South East Asia. Monash Centre for Research in International Education: Melbourne.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic