HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 5 (2025)

Inclusive Education in School Leadership: An Appreciative Inquiry

Jayvie Bryle C. Camilo | Anesito L. Cutillas | Ariel L. Ramos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study employed an appreciative inquiry approach, a qualitative methodology that focuses on identifying and amplifying existing strengths to foster positive change. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with school administrators, teachers, and students, as well as focus group discussions to explore shared experiences and perspectives. Document analysis of school policies and program materials provided contextual understanding. The appreciative inquiry framework guided the research through four phases: Discovery, Dreaming, Designing, and Destiny. Discovery involved identifying and appreciating current inclusive practices. Dreaming explored stakeholders' visions for an ideal inclusive environment. Designing focused on collaboratively developing actionable strategies. Finally, Destiny is involved in proposing implementation and sustainability plans. Thematic analysis was employed to synthesize qualitative data, revealing key leadership strategies and support systems that contribute to inclusive education at the University of the Visayas, Dalaguete Campus.



References:

  1. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
  2. Baker, S., McCarthy, S., & McCarthy, J. (2019). Mentoring for inclusion: Teachers’ perspectives on effective mentoring in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1592027
  3. Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Kieffer, M. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2021). Improving reading comprehension for students with disabilities: A systematic review of intervention research. Exceptional Children, 87(3), 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921993406
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications
  10. Florian, L. (2014). The role of teacher education in inclusive education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.886502
  11. Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: Using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.526588
  12. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.
  13. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  14. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  15. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877-896.
  16. Green, J. (2000). Understanding social programs through evaluation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 981–999). Sage.
  17. Hancocks, L., Goodwin, D., & Stacey, K. (2020). The use of weighted blankets to modify sleep in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Sleep Research, 29(4), e13083. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13083
  18. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
  19. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487