Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2025)

Digital-Based Hybrid Learning in Mathematics

Jon-Jon V. Orpilla | Nora A. Oredina

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The integration of traditional face-to-face instruction with digital-based learning platforms in Mathematics remains underexplored, particularly in developing high-impact learning outcomes. This study assessed the effectiveness of digital-based hybrid learning in Mathematics through the development and validation of a mobile application, Smartmathics. Utilizing a Research and Development (R&D) approach and the ADDIE model, the study employed a Solomon four-group design with 120 learners. Results indicate Smartmathics as highly valid and highly acceptable, significantly improving academic performance compared to traditional methods. Notably, experimental groups exposed to digital-based hybrid learning demonstrated substantial progress, suggesting its potential to enhance learning outcomes and bridge understanding gaps. This innovative approach underscores the transformative power of technology in education, offering dynamic platforms for deeper comprehension and higher achievement levels in Mathematics.



References:

  1. Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Gameil, A. A. (2021). The Effect of Digital Technology Integration on Students’ Academic Performance through Project-Based Learning in an E-Learning Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19421
  2. Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
  3. Barman, D., & Roy, S. K. (2023). The Transition from Offline to Online: Unveiling the Challenges and Opportunities.  International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 4444. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.4444
  4. Braver, M. W., & Braver, S. L. (1988). Statistical treatment of the Solomon four-group design: A meta-analytic approach. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.150
  5. Bringula, R., Reguyal, J.J., Tan, D.D. et al. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  7. Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Harnessing technology integration in education: Strategies for enhancing learning outcomes and equity. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(2), 001-008. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0071
  8. El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
  9. Gnanasagaran, D., & Amat, A. H. (2019). The effectiveness of mobile learning in the teaching and learning of probability. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 9(2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol9.2.2.2019
  10. Kirisci, N., Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2020). The effectiveness of the selective problem solving model on students’ mathematical creativity: A Solomon four-group research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100719
  11. Koole, M. (2009). A Model for Framing Mobile Learning. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58775604.pdf 
  12. Linder, K.E. (2017). Fundamentals of Hybrid Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20222
  13. Mufadhol, M., Siswanto, S., Susatyono, D. D., & Dewi, M. U. (2017). The Phenomenon of Research and Development Method in Research of Software Engineering, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v1i1.4             
  14. Murtiyasa, B., Jannah, I. M., & Rejeki, S. (2020). Designing mathematics learning media based on mobile learning for ten graders of vocational high school. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5637-5647. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081168
  15. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.002 
  16. Pramesworo, I. S., Sembiring, D., Sarip, M., Lolang, E., & Fathurrochman, I. (2023). Identification of New Approaches to Information Technology-Based Teaching for Successful Teaching of Millennial Generation Entering 21st Century Education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 350-370. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2722
  17. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005, October). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In Proceedings of mLearn, 1(1), 1-9.
  18. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
  19. Swope-Farr, T. (2021). Examining virtual mathematics instruction: A comparative case study of in-service elementary teachers with mathematics anxiety and mathematics teaching self-efficacy (Order No. 28498977).
  20. Teisan, J. L. (2018). At Home with Science: A Qualitative Study of Science Teaching in Homeschools (Doctoral dissertation). Oakland University

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic