HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 42 no. 2 (2020)

Planktonic algae as bioindicators of water quality in Pagbanganan River, Baybay City, Leyte

Eunice Kenee L. Seriño | Beatriz S. Belonias

 

Abstract:

Biological monitoring is a valuable method used in conservation studies to protect and preserve the biological integrity of natural ecosystems. This study was conducted to assess the water quality of the Pagbanganan River using planktonic algae as bioindicators of organic pollution. Horizontal tows were made in three selected stations (upstream, midstream & downstream) using a Wisconsin plankton net with 80μm mesh size. Collected samples were preserved with Lugol's solution and 70% ethyl alcohol. Identified phytoplankton genera were analyzed using Palmer's Pollution Index. Out of the 20 pollution indicator genera identified by Palmer (1969), 10 were present in Pagbanganan River, namely; Ankistrodesmus, Closterium, Cyclotella, Gomphonema, Melosira, Navicula, Nitzschia, Oscillatoria, Stigeoclonium, and Synedra. Four of these were among the most abundant algae in the river. Mean Palmer's Pollution Index Scores indicate that there is “less” organic pollution existing in the river. Results imply that the river is still relatively safe for general household use, but effective conservation measures should be done to preserve the integrity of the river ecosystem.



References:

  1. Alvarado AC. 2005. Geomorphological characterization and discharge determination of the Pagbanganan River watershed (BS thesis). Leyte State University, Visca, Baybay, Leyte
  2. Beaugrand G, Ibanez F & Reid PC. 2000. Spatial, seasonal and long-term fluctuations of plankton in relation to hydroclimatic features in the English Channel, Celtic Sea and Bay of Biscay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 200:93-102
  3. Belcher Hand Swale E. 1979. An illustrated guide to river phytoplankton. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Culture Center of Algae and Protozoa, Cambridge
  4. Bellinger EG and Sigee DC. 2010. Freshwater algae: Identification and use as bioindicators. John Wiley & Sons, Lt
  5. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Administrative Order No. 34, Series of 1990. Revised water usage and classification/Water quality criteria amending Section Nos. 68 and 69, Chapter III of the 1978 NPCC Rules and Regulations 
  6. Gadzała-Kopciuch R, Berecka B, Bartoszewicz J & Buszewski B. 2004. Some considerations about bioindicators in environmental monitoring. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 13(5):453-462
  7. Galinato Ml and Evangelio JC. 2016. Dynamics of Plankton Community in Banahao-palhi River in Leyte, Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research 38(2):130-152
  8. Hassan AS, Okuofu CA & Balogun JK. 2008. The use of biological index of pollution in assessing quality of rural water sources in Zaria, Nigeria. Science World Journal 3:2
  9. Jose L and Kumar C. 2011. Evaluation of pollution by Palmer's algal pollution index and physico-chemical analysis of water in four temple ponds of Mattancherry, Ernakulam, Kerala. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 10(3):471-472
  10. Karr JR, Allen JD & Benke AC. 2000. River conservation in the United States and Canada. In Boon PJ, Davies BR & Petts GE (eds) Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy, and Practice (pp3-39). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  11. Kumari P, Dhadse S, Chaudhari PR & Wate SR. 2007. A biomonitoring of plankton to assess quality of water in the lakes of Nagpur City. Proceedings of Taal 2007: the 12th World Lake Conference (pp160-164)
  12. Labonite EK and Belonias BS. 2013. Community structure of planktonic algae in Pagbanganan River, Baybay City, Leyte. Science and Humanities Journal 10:54-82
  13. Lacdan NF, Javier LMV, Pagaddu JVA & Su GLS. 2014. Assessing water quality of Dao River, Batangas using phytoplankton biomonitoring. International Journal of Current Science 12:98-102
  14. Martinez KAS. 2018. Developing a river health index: A study in Ylang-Ylang River, Cavite, Philippines, In 4th International Research Conference on Higher Education, Social Sciences (pp774-788) 
  15. Palmer CM. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. Journal of Phycology 5(1):78-82 Palmer CM. 1977. Algae and water pollution: An illustrated manual on the identification, significance, and control of algae in water supplies and in polluted water. Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio
  16. Salem Z, Ghobara M & El Nahrawy AA. 2017. Spatio-temporal evaluation of the surface water quality in the middle Nile Delta using Palmer's algal pollution index. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4:219-226
  17. Stevenson RJ and Pan Y. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams using diatoms. In Stoermer EF and Smol JP (eds) The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences (pp11-40). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  18. Suthers I, Bowling L, Kobayashi T & Rissik D. 2009. Sampling methods for plankton: In Suthers I & Rissik D (eds) Plankton: A Guide to their Ecology and Monitoring for Water Quality (pp73-114), CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Vic., Australia
  19. Verma JP. 2002. Ecology and ethology of aquatic biota. Volume 1. Edited by Kumar, A.A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi