Impact of the conditional cash transfer program&rsquo; on the monthly food expenditure of household beneficiaries

Norberto  E. Milla,

Impact of the conditional cash transfer program’ on the monthly food expenditure of household beneficiaries

Abstract:

Philippines is among the many countries which has a perennial problem on poverty. The country has made various ways to reduce its poverty rate; one is through conditional cash transfer (CCT) scheme. This study measured the impact of CCT Program, particularly on food consumption among its household beneficiaries using Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Impact is measured in terms of the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) using four matching algorithms: Nearest Neighbor Matching, Caliper (Radius) Matching, Kernel Matching, and Local Linear Regression matching. Binary logistic regression was used to identify covariates influencing program participation which include having children who are 6-12 years old, education of the household heads' spouses, marital status and sex of the household head, housing tenure, and ownership of household assets. Balance test indicates nonsignificant difference between 4Ps and non-4Ps beneficiaries across these covariates. Of the four matching algorithms, the Caliper (radius) matching generated ATT estimate with the least standard error. On the average, using the Caliper matching method, the monthly food expenditure of the household beneficiaries have significantly increased by PHP501.39. Thus, the CCT program of the government has brought significant improvement on the household beneficiaries, not only on education, health, and nutrition but also on their monthly food expenditure. It is recommended that the implementation of the CCT program should be strengthened, sustained, and maintained properly and orderly to gradually alleviate the current poverty conditions in the identified poor barangays around the nation. Moreover, the implementing agencies should consistently monitor the proper and synchronized implementation of the program in order to wholly purge the intergenerational transmission of poverty which is a perennial experience of the households who belong to the poorest populace in the country.

References:

Agbon A, Nolasco FA, Aguilar EJT, Abellanosa RJ & Ligaton L. 2013. Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Examining Gaps and Enhancing Strategies in Cebu City, Philippines. East Asia Development Network
Austin PC. 2011. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: An application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46(1):119-151
Arulpragasam J, Fernandez L, Matsuda Y, Olfindo R & Stephens M. 2011. Building governance and anti-corruption in the Philippines' conditional cash transfer program. World Bank Social Protection Note no. 1. World Bank, Washington, DC
Baser O. 2006. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value health 9(6):377-385
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) Report. 2013. FAQs on the conditional cash transfer program
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD). 2011. National household targeting system for poverty reduction
Fernandez L and Olfindo R. 2011. Overview of the Philippines' conditional cash transfer program: The pantawid pamilyang Pilipino program (Pantawid Pamilya). World Bank Social Protection Policy Note no. 2. World Bank, Washington, DC
Frufonga RF. 2015. The pantawid pamilyang pilipino program (4Ps) in Iloilo, Philippines: An evaluation. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 3(5):59-65
GADM and Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) Report. 2014. Philippines: Region 8 households under 4Ps
Hoddinott J and Skoufias E. 2004. The impact of Progresa on food consumption. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53(1):37-61
National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB). 2011. Philippine poverty statistics
Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). 2009. 2009 official poverty statistics of the Philippines
Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), 2016. 2015 official poverty statistics of the Philippines
Rawlings L and Rubio G. 2005. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs
Reyes CM and Tabuga AD. 2012. Conditional cash transfer program in the Philippines: is it reaching the extremely poor? Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-42. Philippine Institute of Development Studies
Reyes CM, Tabuga AD, Mina CD & Asis RD. 2015. Promoting inclusive growth through the 4Ps. Research Paper Series No. 2015-01. Philippine Institute for Development Studies
Reyes CM, Tabuga AD, Mina CD & Asis RD. 2013. Promoting inclusive growth through the 4Ps
Rosenbaum P and Rubin D. 1985. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal and effects. Biometrika 70(1):41-55
Tabilog RP, Mapola MMB, Cantillano CD, Cabrera MC & Mafiabo RD. 2017. Pantawid pamilyang pilipino program (4Ps): The effectiveness on social welfare and development. 11th International Conference on Law, Education, Business and Management (LEBM-17) Dec. 17-18, 2017 Manila (Philippines)
Canare T. 2017. The Impact of conditional cash transfer on savings and other associated variables: Evidence from the Philippines' 4Ps program. Southeast Asian Journal of Economics 5(1):107-145
Tutor MV. 2014. The impact of Philippines' conditional cash transfer program on consumption. UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 201405, University of the Philippines School of Economics