HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 39 no. 2 (2017)

Dried Poultry Manure as Non-Protein Nitrogen Additive of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) Silage Fed to Sheep

Clarita E. Morbos | Sulpecio C. Bantugan | Lolito C. Bestil

 

Abstract:

he study was conducted to describe the physical characteristics of napier grass silage added with dried poultry manure {DPM) as non-protein N source, and to assess its acceptability and digestibility in sheep. Three types of silages were evaluated: Tl - napier grass alone, T2 - napier grass + DPM (at a ratio containing 10% crude protein), and T3 - napier grass + DPM (at a ratio containing 12% crude protein). These were stored in airtight plastic drum silos for 45 days at room temperature. After evaluation, the silages were tested with 9 male growing sheep for intake and digestibility measurements arranged in completely random fashion. Physical evaluation in terms of color, smell, and texture of the 3 silages showed no significant differences, and all showed good quality silage characteristics. However, significantly higher pH level (p<0.05) approaching normal rumen pH was observed in silages containing DPM {T2 and T3) compared to that without {Tl). Chemical analysis showed significantly higher dry matter {DM) and crude protein {CP) contents in T2 and T3 silages than in Tl. The OM content, however, was significantly reduced with the addition of DPM {T2 and T3) than without {Tl) while acid detergent fiber {ADF) and neutral detergent fiber {NDF) contents showed no significant differences. Nutrient intakes significantly increased with silages containing DPM {T2 and T3) while increases in nutrient digestibility by sheep for the 3 silages showed no significant differences in all parameters measured. The addition of DPM to napier grass silage to contain l Oto 12% CP is recommended to increase CP and DM contents and improve nutrient intakes without affecting nutrient digestibility.



References:

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis (4" edn). Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  2. Bakrie B, Hogan J, Liang JB, Tareque AMM & Upadhyay RC. 1996. Ruminant nutrition and production in the tropics and subtropics (p125). ACIAR Monograph. Canberra, Australia.
  3. Bestil LC, Posas OB, Bantugan SC & Anduyan GAP. 1998. Silage production for a sustainable animal feeding in root crop-growing areas. In Palomar MK & Cagasan EG (eds), Integrated rootcrop research and devevopment. Philippine Rootcrop Research and Training Center, Visayas State College of Agriculture, Baybay, Leyte 6521-A, Philippines.
  4. Bestil LC. 1985. Supplementation of Ca(OH)-treated wheat straw for sheep (MS Thesis). University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.
  5. Bhattacharya AN & Fontenot JP. 1986. Protein and energy value of peanut hull and wood shaving as poultry litter, Journal of Animal Science 25:367-371.
  6. Egan AR, Wanapat M, Doyle PT, Dixon RM & Pearce GR, 1985. Production limitations of intake, digestibility and rate of passage. In Forages of Southeast Asian and South Pacific Agriculture. ACIAR Proceedings, No. 12: 104-108. Cisarua, Indonesia.
  7. Ensminger ME. 1978. The stockman's handbook (5 edn, pp701-722). The Interstate Printers and Publishers. USA.
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2000. Silage-making in the tropics with particular emphasis on smallholders (p159). FAO, Rome.
  9. Goering HK & Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). USDA-ARS agriculture handbook 379, US Government Printing Press, Washington D.C.
  10. Harmon BG, Fontenot JP & Webb KE. 1975. Ensiled broiler litter and corn forage II. Digestibility, nitrogen utilization and palatability by sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 40:56-160.
  11. Mcdonald P. 1996. The biochemistry of silage. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Cambridge, U.K.
  12. Muller ZO. 1982. Feed from animal wastes. In Feeding Manual (pp15-18, 26). FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 28. FAO, Rome.
  13. NRC. 1975. Nutrient requirements of sheep (5th edn, pp42-43). National Research Council.
  14. Oldfield JE. 1972. Effect of fermentation on chemical and nutritive value of feeds. In Effect of processing on the nutritional value of feeds (p34).
  15. Ranjhan HK. 1993. Animal nutrition in the tropics (3 edn, pp212-221). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Cambridge, U.K.
  16. Tacio HD. 1994. Wide use of silage to increase cattle production. Greenfields, 22(11):71- 72.
  17. Trung LT, Abenir EE, Rustamadji B, Robles AY, Arambulo BRS & Lapinid RR. 1985, Supplementary values of dried poultry manure and Leucaena to corn silage for early lactating cows. In Doyle PT (ed), The utilization of fibrous agricultural residues as animal feed (pp154-159), Canberra, Australia.
  18. Trung LT. 1988. The nutritional value of poultry manure as feed for ruminants. Extension Bulletin No. 281. ASPAC-Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, Taiwan.
  19. Zamora F JR. 1991. How to feed dried poultry manure to livestock. Greenfields, 22(11):32.