HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 39 no. 1 (2017)

Assessing the Microlevel Impacts of Sin Tax Law on Cigarette Consumption: A Case Study for Mahaplag, Leyte, Philippines

Lemuel S. Preciados | Jayson E. Carcajente

 

Abstract:

Examined in this study were the effects of Sin Tax Law at the microlevel. Using the before-and-after method of analyzing impacts, we applied a multiple regression analysis incorporating difference-in-difference approach of econometric estimation. It appeared that youths had significantly lower cigarette consumption after the implementation of this law. This suggests that Sin Tax Law (STL) discouraged the youth from smoking. In contrast, consumption of cigarettes among adults did not change significantly implying that the tax induced price-increase was relatively less effective. Therefore, it is recommended that there should be specific policies targeting adult smokers to inhibit them from consuming more cigarettes. Results also provide important lessons for future research in monitoring and evaluating public policies



References:

  1. BESANKO, D., AND BRAEUTIGAM R. (2010). "Microeconomics-4" Edition". WILEY, United States of America.
  2. BISHOP, JOHN A. AND YOO, JANG H. 1985. Health Scare, Excise Taxes and Advertising Ban in the Cigarette Demand and Supply. Southern Economic Journal, 52(4), pp. 402-11.
  3. BLECHER, E., AND VAN WALBEEK, C. (2008). "An analysis of Cigarette Affordability". Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.
  4. CHALOUPKA, F. J. (1991). Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking. Journal of Political Economy, 99: 722-42.
  5. DOUGLAS, S. M., AND G. HARIHARAN. (1994). The Hazard of Starting Smoking: Estimates from a Split Sample Duration Model. Journal of Health Economics 13,213-230.
  6. EVANS, W. N., AND M. C. FARRELLY. (1995). The Compensating Behavior of Smokers: Taxes, Tar and Nicotine, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.
  7. GALLET, C.A. AND J.A. LIST. (2003). Cigarette Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities. Health Economics 12(10):821-835.
  8. GROSSMAN, M., D. COATE, E.M. LEWIT, AND R.A. SHAKOTКО (1983), "Economic and Other Factors in Youth Smoking" Final Report, National Science Foundation
  9. HARRIS, JEFFREY E. (1985). "On the Fairness of Cigarette Excise Taxation" The Cigarette Excise Tax. Cambridge, MA: Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, pp. 106-11
  10. ΚΑΝ, Μ. (2007). Investigating cigarette affordability in 60 cities using cigarette price-daily income ratio. Tobacco Control, 429-432.
  11. LEWIT, E. M., D. COATE, AND M. GROSSMAN. (1981). The Effects of Government Regulations on Teenage Smoking. Journal of Law and Economics, 24:545-69.
  12. LEWIT, E. M., AND D. COATE. (1982). The Potential for Using Excise Taxes to Reduce Smoking. Journal of Health Economics, 1: 121-45, 1982.
  13. MANNING, W., KEELER E., NEWHOUSE J., SLOSS E., AND WASSERMAN J. (1991). The Costs of Poor Health Habits. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
  14. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (1993). The Impact of Cigarette Excise Taxes on Smoking Among Children and Adults: Summary Report of a National Cancer Institute Expert Panel. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Control Science Program.
  15. NGUYEN, C. V. (2012). "Demographic and Socio-economic Determinants of Smoking: Evidence from Vietnam", Economics Bulletin, Vol. 32 No. 3 pp. 2300- 2312
  16. ULEP, V.G. (2012). "The Impact of Sin Tax Law on the Affordability of Cigarette in the Philippines. Health Justice Philippines, Inc. and the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance.
  17. WASSERMAN, JEFFREY, WILLARD G. MANNING, JOSEPH P. NEWHOUSE, AND JOHN D. WINKLER. (1991). "The Effects of Excise Taxes and Regulations on Cigarette Smoking". Journal of Health Economics 10: 43-64.
  18. XIAOHUI HOU, XIAOCHEN XU, AND IAN ANDERSON. (2015). Determinants of Tobacco Consumption in Papua New Guinea: Challenges in Changing Behaviors. Health Nutrition and Population Global Practice Group