Performance of fresh market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) lines as influenced by pruning

Apolinario  B. Gonzaga, Jr.,; Gordon  Rogers,; Nelda  R. Gonzaga,; Sarah Lyn  A. Pepito,

Performance of fresh market tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) lines as influenced by pruning

Nelda R. Gonzaga | Sarah Lyn A. Pepito | Apolinario B. Gonzaga, Jr. | Gordon Rogers

Abstract:

Tomato production in the Philippines is dominated by conventional farmers who do not practice pruning. Currently, rampant occurrence of diseases almost wiped out the industry and availability of resistant seeds became a problem however several studies reported that pruning lessened diseases and enhanced yield. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of pruning on the performance of different fresh market tomato genotypes. The experiment was laid out in factorial design using Randomized Complete Block Design with pruning as Factor A and tomato genotypes as Factor B with Harabas ( Harabas Rescuer 746) as control. Pruning obtained thicker stem and 18% higher fruit set, reduced Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus and increased tomato yield by producing a higher number of marketable fruits. AVTO 1173 produced the heaviest and largest fruits with the least TYLCV. Pruning is a beneficial practice that farmers could adopt, along with AVTO 1173 as a substitute for the Harabas, check variety. Additional trials of AVTO 1173 should be conducted in different locations to further verify its adaptability and performance in other situations.

References:

Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC). 2010. Improved vegetable lines retrieved on January 2015 from http://avrdc.org/seed/improved-lines/
Chen JT and Lal G. 1999. Pruning and staking tomatoes. AVRDC International Cooperators Guide. AVRDC pub 9-490
Chitwood DH, Kumar R, Headland LR, Ranjan A, Covington MF, Ichihashi Y & Sinha NR. 2013. A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines. The Plant Cell 25(7):2465-2481
Dillard H. 2010. Diagnosing Tomato Problems. College University and College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Ferrandino FJ. 2010. Pruning, Training, and Supporting Tomatoes. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
Gao G, Bergefurd B & Precheur B. 2010. Growing Tomatoes in the Home Garden. Agriculture and Natural Resources
Goda Y, El-Rehim A, Mohamed AA, Helaly AA & El-Zeiny OAH. 2014. Effect of shoot Pruning on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Husk Tomato (Physalis pubescens L.). Journal of American Science 10(1):5-10
Kanyomeka Land Shivute B. 2005. Influence of pruning on tomato production under controlled environments. Agricultura Tropicaet Subtropica 32(2):79-81
Mercado JR A, Tulin A, Dorahy C, Gilkes R & Prakongkep N. 2010, August. Soil management and crop nutrition for tomato in acid soil of Claveria, Philippines. In Proceedings of the 19^th World Congress of Soil Science: Soil solutions for a changing world (pp270-273)
Muhammad A and Singh A. 2007. Yield of tomato as influenced by training and pruning in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Plant Science 2(3):310-317
Natwick E. 2007. Controlling tomato yellow leaf curl virus. UCCE Entomology Farm Advisor Imperial County, California Western Farm Press.
Poorter H and Sack L. 2012. Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants. Frontiers in plant science 3:259
Richardson K. 2012. The Effects of Pruning Versus Non-Pruning on Quality and Yield of Staked Fresh-Market Tomatoes. Gladstone Road Agricultural Centre. Department of Agriculture.
Santos Band Vallad G. 2013. Cultural Practices for Vegetable and Small Fruit Crops: Does Shoot Pruning Improve Tomato Yield and Reduce Bacterial Spot Infestation. Publication #HS1180
Thornley JH. 1999. Modelling stem height and diameter growth in plants. Annals of Botany 84(2):195-205