Performance evaluation of a taro (Colocasia esculenta) assisted vermifilter for swine wastewater treatment

Justine Carl  Abad,; Ma. Grace  C. Sumaria,

Performance evaluation of a taro (Colocasia esculenta) assisted vermifilter for swine wastewater treatment

Justine Carl Abad | Ma. Grace C. Sumaria

Abstract:

Untreated swine wastewater is one of the main contributors to the problem of water pollution in areas where swine farming is prevalent. Lack of wastewater treatment facilities can cause nutrient buildup in bodies of water, that result in adverse environmental effects such as eutrophication and can cause the buildup of pathogens in bodies of water. This study evaluated the feasibility of a vermifilter using African Night Crawlers (Eudrilus eugeniae) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) in treating swine wastewater. The cylindrical vermifilters each had a diameter of 35cm, 50cm of freeboard, 15cm of soil substrate, and 35cm of gravel of mixed sizes. One vermifilter was planted with taro plants (TAVF) while the other was not (VF). Water samples were collected from the effluent of the respective setups, and were analyzed for electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH. Results from the Taro Assisted Vermifilter showed an average of 70.45% and 70.50% removal efficiencies for EC and TDS, respectively. The observed average increase in pH was 0.66, while the effluent ORP values for the TAVF exceeded 220mV. The TAVF showed no signs of clogging throughout the wastewater loading period, and a significant increase in the earthworm mass was observed. The plants used were also observed to have grown significantly throughout the experiment. The TAVF, however, did not perform better than the VF in terms of removal efficiency. Overall, the system demonstrated potential as a treatment facility for swine farms with significant wastewater effluent and showed efficiency with extended periods of acclimatization.

References:

Bindu T, Sylas VP, Mahesh M, Rakesh PS & Ramasamy EV. 2008. Pollutant removal from domestic wastewater with Taro (Colocasia esculenta) planted in a subsurface flow system. Ecological Engineering 33(1)68 82
Jicong H, Yanyun Q, Guangqing L & Dong R. 2005. The Influence of Temperature, pH and C/N Ratio on the Growth and Survival of Earthworms in Municipal Solid Waste. CIGR Journal7, 100083
Mandal HK. 2014. Effect of temperature on pH of wastewater of Phagwara. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research– 9(10):1219 1229
Ndegwa P, Wang L & Vadella VK. 2007. Potential strategies for process control and monitoring of stabilization of dairy wastewaters in batch aerobic treatment systems. Process Biochemistry 42(9):1272 1278
Račys V, Kliu ininkas L, Jankūnaitė D & Albrektienė R. 2010. Application of ORP for the Evaluation of Water Contamination. Linneaus Eco-Tech 10, 114
Rusydi A. 2017. Correlation between conductivity and total dissolved solid in various type of water: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science –118(1):012 019
Sakshi V, Tapendra S, Anuj C, Gyanendra KG, Rupasi T & Triveni D. 2023. Livestock & and poultry farm wastewater treatment and its valorization for generating value-added products: Recent updates and way forward. Bioresource Technology 382:129170
Samal K, Dash RR, & Bhunia P. 2017. Performance assessment of a (Canna indica) assisted vermifilter for synthetic dairy wastewater treatment. Process Safety and Environmental Protection III, (pp363–374)
Samal K, Dash RR, & Bhunia P. 2018. Design and development of a hybrid macrophyte assisted vermifilter for the treatment of dairy wastewater: A statistical and kinetic modelling approach. Science of the Total Environment 645:156–169
Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Ge Z, Hu C, & Zhang H. 2014. Effects of influent C/N ratios on wastewater nutrient removal and simultaneous greenhouse gas emission from the combinations of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands and earthworm eco-filters for treating synthetic wastewater. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 16(3): 567–575