Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 18 no. 3 (2024)

Gender-Sensitive Teaching and Social Presence as Predictors to Students’ Motivation in Learning Physical Education in A Limited Face-To-Face Learning Environment

Cristine Carreon-Danan | Saramie Belleza

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing students' performance in Physical Education, focusing on gender sensitivity teaching, motivation, and social presence. It sought to determine students' perception of gender sensitivity teaching, social presence's importance, and motivation to learn Physical Education. Additionally, the study examined the relationship between awareness of gender sensitivity teaching and motivation, as well as social presence and motivation. Ultimately, it aimed to identify which factor between gender sensitivity teaching and social presence most significantly predicted student motivation in Physical Education. The research concluded that students showed a very high level of agreement on gender-sensitive teaching, social presence, and motivation in Physical Education (PE). There was a significant relationship between these variables, indicating that gender-sensitive teaching and social presence significantly predicted students' motivation in PE. However, only teachers' values and attitudes within gender-sensitive teaching were not found to be a predictor of students' motivation. Overall, all independent variables had predictive ability for student performance in PE. The study's findings support the Gender Motivation Theory, suggesting that addressing gender-related factors positively influences motivation by promoting diversity, inclusivity, and challenging stereotypes. The Conceptual Change Theory also highlights how restructuring students' perceptions through gender-sensitive teaching and social presence enhances motivation via positive social interactions and conceptual shifts. Recommendations include continuing and promoting gender-sensitive teaching methods in PE, fostering social presence through inclusive teaching practices, and sustaining students' high motivation levels. Strategies like diverse activities, constructive feedback, and peer interactions can help maintain motivation and engagement. Continuous assessment and longitudinal studies are suggested to monitor and understand the long-term effects of interventions on student performance.



References:

  1. Aikman, S., & Unterhalter, E. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education. Oxfam.
  2. Almasi, Mustapha & Zhu, Chang. (2018). Students’ Perceptions of Social Presence in Blended Learning Courses in a Tanzanian Medical College. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 13. 107. 10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8566.
  3. Anderson, T.,  Rourke, L., Garrison, D. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 5. 10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875.
  4. Al-rawahi, Nasser & Yousef, Ahmad. (2021). Teaching Efficacy Level of Physical Education Teachers in Oman and Kuwait Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Higher Education. 10. 9. 10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p9.
  5. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
  6. Araka, Eric & Maina, Elizaphan & Gitonga, Rhoda & Oboko, Robert & Kihoro, John. (2021). University Students' Perception on the Usefulness of Learning Management System Features in Promoting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 17. 45-64.
  7. Aschbacher, P. R., Lee, E. and Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564 – 582.
  8. Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face- to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094
  9. Balog,N.,(2018).Impacts of the Learning Environment on Developer’s Progress. Accessed from https://www.codingdojo.com/blog/impacts-of-the-learning-nvironment,)
  10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  11. Barker, D., & Quennerstedt, M. (2017). Power and group work in physical education: A Foucauldian perspective. European Physical Education Review, 23(3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15620716
  12. Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests. Science, 355(6323), 389-391.
  13. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comp. Mediated Commun. 3:JCMC324. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x
  14. Birkett, M., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. W. (2020). LGB and questioning students in schools: The moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 80, 86-96.
  15. Bruder, R., Prescott, A. (2013). Research evidence on the benefits of IBL. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0542-2
  16. Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M. and Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065.
  17. Bukhari, T. Z., Khan, J., Shahzadi, I., & Khalid, A. (2014). Mediating role of motivation to learn in determining e-learning outcomes: a conceptual study. Business and Management, 6(2), 179-189.
  18. Cahyani, A., Listiana, I. D., & Larasati, S. P. D. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 123-140.
  19. Carlon, S. L., Taylor, N. F., Dodd, K. J., & Shields, N. (2013). Differences in habitual physical activity levels of young people with cerebral palsy and their typically developing peers: a systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation, 35(8), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.715721
  20. Casey, A., Dyson, B., & Cowburn, G. (2018). The impact of a teacher professional development programme on the promotion of positive student attitudes and emotions in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 24(4), 372-391.
  21. Cavalcanti, P., de Mello, R., André, R., Freitas, F. & Gaševic, V. (2019). An Analysis of the use of Good Feedback Practices in Online Learning Courses. IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 153-157, doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2019.00061.
  22. Cavallo, Ann & Rozman, M. & Blickenstaff, J. & Walker, N.. (2003). Learning, reasoning, motivation, and epistemological beliefs. Journal of College Science Teaching. 33. 18-23.
  23. Chen, J., & Smith, L. (2019). Promoting gender equity in physical education: The role of gender-sensitive teaching practices. European Physical Education Review, 25(4), 973–992. doi: 10.1177/1356336X19860834
  24. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women's anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656-664.
  25. Cid, L., Moutão, J., & Leitão, J. (2016). Social factors predicting physical education students' motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115(2), 581-592.
  26. Costley, J., Fanguy, M. Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: the interplay of completeness and interaction. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 655–671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09979-2
  27. Cox, A. E., Smith, A. L., & Williams, L. (2018). Change in physical education motivation and physical activity behavior during middle school. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 130-138.
  28. Cox, A. E., & Duncheon, N. P. (2018). The influence of peers and motivation on physical education engagement. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(5), 36-42.
  29. Cox, A., Williams, L., & Williams, M. (2016). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students' physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(2), 137-147.
  30. Davis, C. J., & Bindewald, L. (2021). Examining the relationship between gender sensitivity in physical education and students' intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(2), 123-136.
  31. Davis, S. N., & Risman, B. J. (2015). Teaching gender: An intersectional approach. Teaching Sociology, 43(4), 191-203.
  32. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53.
  33. DeLong, M., & Winter, D. (2002). Strategies for motivating students. Learning to teach and teaching to learn mathematics: Resources for professional development (pp.159-168). Washington, D. C.: Mathematical Association of America.
  34. DePalma, R., & Atkinson, A. (2013). Classroom climate and gender-based learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(4), 148-153.
  35. Dumford, A.D., Miller, A.L. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput High Educ 30, 452–465 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
  36. Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Thummaphan, P., Lan, M. C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2017). Caution, student experience may vary: Social identities impact a student's experience in peer discussions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), ar69.
  37. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127.
  38. Ennis, C. D. (2019). Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction. Human Kinetics.
  39. Enoc, Jeromil & Gagani, Ray Ferdinand. (2019). The Development Of A Gender- Sensitivity Teaching Test. 3. 17-24.
  40. Escartí, A., Gutiérrez, M., Pascual, C., & Llopis, R. (2017). Influence of perceived autonomy support from the teacher on students' motivation in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 160-167.
  41. Escomes, E., Gutierrez, C., Sarabia, I., Morbo, E., & Calixtro Jr., V. (2021). Factors Affecting Distance Learning of the Physical Education Students of Sultan Kudarat State University, Mindanao, Philippines. Indonesian Journal of Educational    Research    and    Technology,    1(3),    87-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v1i3.41413
  42. Eyles, A., Gibbons, S., & Montebruno, P. (2020). Covid-19 school shutdowns: What will they do to our children’s education? London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104675/
  43. Fahle, Kim. (2019). Collaboration and community in undergraduate writing synchronous video courses (SVCs) [Doctoral dissertation. Old Dominion University ]. doi:. https://doi.org/10.25777/ctje-8v79
  44. Galacgac, N. B. (2017). Gender responsiveness in the curriculum and its relationship and influence to students’ learning behaviors. LCC Research Journal, 12(1).
  45. Garcia Gaitero, O., Costa Roman, O., & Real Garcia, J. J. (2016). Triangulation of successful sources in teaching: learning styles, gamification and self- regulated learning. Journal of Learning Styles, 9(18), 117-134. Retrieved from http://learningstyles.uvu.edu/index.php/jls/article/view/291/219
  46. Gecana, R., Lobo, E., Prudente, K.R., Saguion, M.K., & Vierneza, J.C. (2018). LEVEL OF GENDER SENSITIVITY OF THE GRADE 8 TEACHERSIN BALIBAGO    NATIONAL     HIGH SCHOOL . https://www.academia.edu/36764145/Level_of_Gender
  47. Guay, Frederic & Vallerand, Robert & Blanchard, Céline. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion. 24. 175-213. 10.1023/A:1005614228250.
  48. Gurian, M. (2010). Boys and girls learn differently!: A guide for teachers and parents. Jossey-Bass.
  49. Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ motivation in online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era: A case study. Holistics Journal. 12(2). https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/holistic/article/view/3029
  50. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2011). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1-51.
  51. Hamilton, M. D., Whitehead, J. R., & Huntley, T. (2021). Influences on student perceptions of teacher social presence in secondary physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(2), 217-228.
  52. Hastie, P. A., Casey, A., & Rink, J. (2016). Non-reciprocal peer teaching: A viable approach to increasing social support in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 22(2), 167-182.
  53. Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model.           Human       Development, 21(1),   34–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271574
  54. Herman, J.L. (2013). Formative Assessment for Next Generation Science Standards: A Proposed Model.
  55. Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers &          Education,       138,     1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012.
  56. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?. Educational Psychology Review 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  57. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495.
  58. Jeong, Hyun-Chul & So, Wi-Young. (2020). Difficulties of Online Physical Education Classes in Middle and High School and an Efficient Operation Plan to Address Them. International journal of environmental research and public health. 17. 10.3390/ijerph17197279.
  59. Johnson, L., Anderson, J., & Williams, K. (2020). Creating Inclusive Physical Education Environments: The Impact on Student Engagement and Enjoyment. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 372-389.
  60. Johnson, R., Williams, K., Anderson, M., & Brown, S. (2022). Social presence and student motivation in physical education: A path analysis. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(2), 173–189. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2022.2038247
  61. Jusoff, K., & Khodabandelou, R. (2009). Preliminary study on the role of social presence in blended learning environment in higher education. International Education Stud-ies, 2(4): 79. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n4p79
  62. Ke, F., & Graber, K. (2015). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. In Learning, Design, and Technology (pp. 41-59). Springer, Cham.
  63. Keddie, A. (2008). (Re)presenting women's lives in schools: A feminist approach to pedagogical development. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(3), 289-303.
  64. Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2016). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512-1520.
  65. Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
  66. Korenius, S. (2018). Gender-sensitive education. 2011. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2018121020791.
  67. Kreijns, Karel & Van Acker, Frederik & Vermeulen, Marjan & Buuren, Hans. (2014). Community of Inquiry: Social Presence Revisited. E-Learning and Digital Media. 11. 5. 10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5.
  68. Kul, M., Yilmaz, H. & Yaşartürk, F. (2018). An Investigation of Professional Problems of Physical Education and Sports Teachers and Effects of These Problems on their Performance and Motivation. Higher Education Studies. 8. 23. 10.5539/hes.v8n4p23.
  69. Kwon, H., & Trail, G. T. (2017). The role of social support and social networks in physical activity and exercise among middle-aged and older adults in rural areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(1), 29-45.
  70. Laal, M., Ghodsi, S.M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Elsevier, 31, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
  71. Lang, L., & Trimborn, M. (2017). Gender-sensitive teaching and student motivation in physical education. International Journal of Gender, Sexuality, and Education, 3(2), 110–125. doi: 10.1080/23319874.2017.1285579
  72. Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., and Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Studies 64, 962–973. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.002
  73. Lesperance, K., Hofer, S., Retelsdorf, J., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Reducing gender differences in student motivational-affective factors: A meta- analysis of school-based interventions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 1502– 1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12512
  74. Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2017). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and interactive learning environments as predictors of self-regulation in e- learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.
  75. Lin, G.-Y. (2004, October). Social presence questionnaire of online collaborative learning: Development and validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL.
  76. Lirgg, C. D., Kelley, B. C., & Graden, A. (2011). Ethnic differences in intrinsic motivation and physical activity in a school-based sample of 5th-grade students: A self-determination theory perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(2), 267-271.
  77. Lowenthal, Patrick & Dennen, Vanessa. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: research development and needs. Distance Education. 38. 137-140. 10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172.
  78. Maharaj, M. R., Kissoon, A., & Lalla, S. (2019). Social interaction and its influence on students' participation in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(4), 446-453.
  79. Maharaj-Sharma, R. (2018). Social presence and motivation in online physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(4), 392-399.
  80. Mayer, R.E., & Alexander, P.A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Research on Learning and           Instruction       (1st ed.).            Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089
  81. Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional Models for Physical Education (4th ed.).Routledge.
  82. Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Sicilia, Á., & Cervelló, E. (2019). Predicting intention and physical activity behaviour: A moderated mediation model of health self- concept and perceived autonomy support in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 25(3), 839-858.
  83. Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications. Frontiers in robotics and AI, 5, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
  84. Özonur, Mesut & Yanpar Yelken, Tuğba & Sancar Tokmak, Hatice. (2018). Social presence and motivation in online environments: Second Life versus the Enocta Learning Management System/Adobe Connect. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 34. 14. 10.14742/ajet.3128.
  85. Pais, A., Costa, P., Silva, P., & Moreira, J. (2018). Inclusive Physical Education: Effects of a hybrid program on social participation of students with disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1987.
  86. Papaioannou, A., Marsh, H. W., & Theodorakis, Y. (2006). A cross-cultural generalizability investigation of students' achievement goals and their relations with motivational, affective, and behavioural responses in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28(1), 69-92.
  87. Posner, G. J., & Gertzog, W. A. The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change. Sci. Educ., 1982,66, 195-209
  88. Rachmat, N. (2020). Analysis of effectiveness of online learning pandemic covid- 19 in prosthetic orthotic major in Polkesta. Jurnal Terpadu Ilmu Kesehatan, 9(2), 117- 268.
  89. Richardson, J. & Caskurlu, S. & Lv, J. (2017). Social Presence in Relation to Students’ Satisfaction and Learning in the Online Environment: A Meta- analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. 71. 402–417. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001.s
  90. Richardson, J.C.; Maeda, Y.; Lv, J.; Caskurlu, S. Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta- analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 71, 402–417.
  91. Richards, K. A., Gaudreault, K. L., Woods, A. M., & Brown, B. A. (2019). Socially shared regulation in collaborative learning: Coordinating minds through ephemeral roles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4), 514-547.
  92. Robb, C.A. & Sutton, J.. (2014). The importance of social presence and motivation in distance learning. Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering. 31. 1-10.
  93. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. Scribner.
  94. Sadowski, C. (2020). Using Gender-Inclusive Language in the College Classroom: Addressing Student Resistance. Teaching Sociology, 48(2), 110-121.
  95. Skinner, E. A. (2006). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 550-567.
  96. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  97. Stewart, M.K., Hilliard, L., Stillman-Webb, N., & Cunningham, J.M. (2021). The community of inquiry in writing studies survey: Interpreting social presence in disciplinary contexts. Online Learning, 25(2), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2275
  98. Sukor, Rashidah & Ayub, A.F. & Zawawi, Norhasnida & Nor-Khaizura, M-A-R. (2017). Influence of Students†™ Motivation on Academic Performance among Non-Food Science Students Taking Food Science Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 6. 10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i4/3528.
  99. Steinfeldt, J. A., Carter, H. J., Benton, S. A., & Steinfeldt, M. C. (2016). The influence of perceived motivational climate on moral disengagement in sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 39(4), 397-418.
  100. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581-593.
  101. Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn't mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757-769.
  102. Subramaniam, P. R., & Silverman, S. (2015). Student motivation for physical education in a tropical environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(3), 270-281.
  103. Sum, K. W. R., Wallhead, T., and Ha, S. C. A. (2018). Effects of physical education continuing professional development on teachers’ physical literacy and self-efficacy and students’ learning outcomes. Int. J. Educ. Res. 88, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.001
  104. Retzinger, D. (2018). I2I: The poetics of identification. Unpublished Dissertation.
  105. Roland B., Jean, T. (2003). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, The Review of Economic Studies. 70(3), 489–520, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 937X.00253
  106. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  107. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
  108. Sinatra, G. M., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Intentional conceptual change: The self-regulation of science learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 203– 216). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  109. Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81: 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014. 10.015.
  110. Turhan, Nihan. (2020). Gender Differences in Academic Motivation: A Meta- Analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies. 7. 211-224. 10.17220/ijpes.2020.02.019.
  111. United Nations. Department of Public Information. (2009). Millennium Development Goals Report 2009 (Includes the 2009 Progress Chart). United Nations Publications.
  112. Vasanthan R, Ancymol Joy (2022). Literature for Gender Sensitivity: An Overview Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, Vol. 13(1). 61 – 69.Vazou, S., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2012). Predicting young students' motivational indices in physical education: A multilevel approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22(4), 663-670.
  113. Wang, W., & Zhan, J. (2020). The relationship between English language learner characteristics and online self-regulation: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 3009.
  114. Winstok, Z., Weinberg, M., & Smadar-Dror, R. (2017). Studying partner violence to understand gender motivations—Or vice-versa? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.022
  115. Wood, J. T., & Lenze, L. F. (1991). Strategies to enhance gender sensitivity in communication education. Communication Education, 40(1), 16-21
  116. Xiong, Yan & Sun, Xi-Yang & Liu, Xue-Qian & Wang, Ping & Zheng, Bing. (2020). The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Work Input on Physical Education Teachers’ Creative Teaching. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2856. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02856.
  117. Yoo, J., & Choi, J. (2017). The relationship between social presence and academic emotions in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 58-64.
  118. Yoon, P., & Leem, J. (2021). The Influence of Social Presence in Online Classes Using Virtual Conferencing: Relationships between Group Cohesion, Group Efficacy, and Academic Performance. Sustainability, 13(4), 1988. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041988
  119. Zaman, A. (2008). Gender Sensitive Teaching: A Reflective Approach for Early Childhood Education Teacher Training Programs. Education, 129(1).
  120. Zhang, L., Kalyuga, S., Lee, C., & Lei, C. (2016). Effectiveness of collaborative learning of computer programming under different learning group formations according to students’ prior knowledge: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 171–192.
  121. Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13–24.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic