HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 7 (2024)

Performance in the National Qualifying Examination for School Heads (NQESH), SelfEfficacy and Motivation of School Heads in Region VIII

Gennie Lacanaria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Utilizing a descriptive-correlational design, the study determined the NQESH performance, self-efficacy, and motivation of sixty-three (63) school heads in Region VIII. As revealed by the findings, majority of respondents demonstrated an outstanding performance over the past three years and were deemed experienced or highly experienced in terms of length of service and administrative or special assignments managed. The findings likewise indicated that nearly all respondents have either poor or very poor performance ratings in the NQESH along the domains of school leadership, instructional leadership and school management. However, the vast majority of them have either high or very high level of self-efficacy and motivation – whether intrinsic or extrinsic. Moreover, correlation analysis results indicated a non-substantial relationship between the profile, self-efficacy and motivation of the school heads and their NQESH ratings in school leadership, instructional leadership and school management. Regression analysis, however, showed that intrinsic motivation can significantly predict ratings in school leadership. In view of the findings, the study proposed an intervention program aimed at raising the NQESH passing rate in Region VIII. This program is likewise envisioned to have the potential to enhance school heads’ leadership performance and effectiveness in the field



References:

  1. Adair, J. (2013). Confucius on leadership. Pan Macmillan.
  2. Arman, M., Syamsul, B.T. and Darman, M. (2016) The effect of school supervisors’ competence and school principals’ competence on work motivation and performance of junior high school teachers in Maros Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11, 7309-7317. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115494.pdf Aydin, A. H. (2011). Management Science (4. Edition)
  3. Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918-1942.
  4. Brandmo, C., Aas, M., Colbjørnsen, T., & Olsen, R. (2019). Group coaching that promotes self-efficacy and role clarity among school leaders. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2019.1659406
  5. Brandmo, C., Tiplic, D., & Elstad, E. (2019). Antecedents of department heads’ job autonomy, role clarity, and self-efficacy for instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1580773
  6. Casey, R. J., Hilton, R., & Robbins, J. (2012). A comparison of motivation of workers in the United States versus Nicaragua and
  7. Guatemala utilizing the Hackman and Oldham job characteristics model. International Journal of Business and Public Administration,9(3), 39-60. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA335070889&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15474844&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ea7154051&aty=open-web-entry
  8. Cobanoglo, F. & Yurek, U. (2018). School administrator’s self-efficacy beliefs and leadership styles. Volume 7, Issue 3, 555-565. European Journal of Educational Research. Pamukkale University. Turkey.
  9. Deci et al. (1991) Motivation and education: the self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychologist. University of Rochester, New York.
  10. DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015. Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the results-based performance management system
  11. (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance-management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
  12. DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020. National adoption and implementation of the philippine professional standards for school heads (PPSSH). https://nqesh.teacherph.com/philippine-professional-standards-school-heads-ppssh/
  13. DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2010. National adoption and implementation of the national competency-based standards for school heads. https://depedtambayan.net/national-competency-based-standards-school-heads/
  14. DepEd Memorandum No. 76, s. 2019. Results of the 2018 Principals’ Test. https://www.teacherph.com/results-2018-principals-test/
  15. Donmez, B. (2013). Motivasyon [Motivation]. In Servet Ozdemir (ed.). Egitim yonetiminde kuram ve uygulama (pp.185-229). Ankara:Pegem Akademi. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=igXR3HwAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
  16. Eberhard, J. (2013). School administrators self-efficacy: change-agents in an environment of turbulence. Florida International University, USA.
  17. Edwards, A. K., Afriyie, S., & Aboagye, S. K. (2018). Relationship between self-efficacy and leadership styles of school leaders: Implications for teacher development. 1, 141-161.
  18. Eren, E. (2001). Organizational behavior and management psychology. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
  19. Erdem, A. R., & Cicekdemir, I. (2016). Opinions of primary and secondary school principals about internal and external motivation.
  20. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(64). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/24398/258633
  21. Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2014). Problems and difficulties encountered by students towards mastering learning competencies in mathematics. Researchers World, 5(4), 25.
  22. Goden, L. T., Lumbab, N. T., Niez, R. A., & Coton, V. G. (2016). Influence of school heads’instructional competencies o teachers’management in leyte division, philippines.
  23. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1985. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 9(2), 157-191. http://dx.doi.orh/1080
  24. Haris, I., Naway, F.A., Pulukadang, W.T., Takeshita, H. and Ancho, I.V. (2018). School supervision practices in the indonesian education system; perspectives and challenges. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/496780
  25. Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of educational research, 86(2), 531-569. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=hitt+and+tucker+leadership&oq=Hitt+and+
  26. IŞIK, AN, & Gümüş, E. (2017). Examining the relationship between administrator self-efficacy and school effectiveness. Kastamonu Education Journal , 25 (1), 419-434. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10555011010366276596&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
  27. Jandaghi, G., Fard, S. M. H., Sharahi, I. C., & Rajabi, M. (2011). Investigation the relationship between job traits and job stress (Case study: Shahed University staff and professors). Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(5), 24. https://www.ajbmr.com/articlepdf/ajbmrv01n0504.pdf
  28. Kanfer, R. (1992). Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 7, 1-53.
  29. Knapp, M., Honig, M., Plecki, M., Portin, B. and Copland, M. (2014). Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts, Routledge, New York, NY.
  30. Lai, E. (2011). Motivation: a literature review.http:  www.peasonassessment.com
  31. Lane, E.S., (Nov. 2016). Examining the relationship between principal leadership and school climate. University of Denver.
  32. Legault, L. (2016). Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 1–4. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1139-
  33. Llego, M. (2017, October 29). NQESH - Principal’s examination test review materials. https://www.teacherph.com/nqesh-principals-test-review-materials/
  34. Moodly, A. & Toni, N. (2015). Women’s voices of and on leadership in higher education. Paper presented at the global research and international services (GRDS) 7th international conference on teaching, education and learning (ICTEL), 10-11 October 20115, Pointeaux Piments, Mauritius.
  35. Nannyonjo, H. (2017). Effective ways for developing school leadership. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Nannyonjo%2C+H.+%282017%29.+Effective+Ways+for+Developin
  36. g+School+Leadership.&btnG=NCBSSH-TDNA. (2012). Guide and tools. https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/pangasinan-state-university/bs-education/ncbssh-tdna-guide-and-tools-december-2012/14363067
  37. Norton, M. & Kelly, L.K. (2013). The principal as a learning-leader:motivating students by emphasizing achievement. United States of America: Rowman & Little Field Publishers, INC.
  38. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Innovative leadership practices of school heads. https://www.coursehero.com/file/220716166/INNOVATIVE-LEADERSHIP-PRACTICES-OF-SCHOOL-HEADS-1docx/
  39. Pricellas, V. S., Niez, R. A., Nierra, R. N., & Tubis, A. P. U. (2016). Effectiveness of school administrators’ leadership skills and behaviors and their school performance in area iii leyte division, philippines. Journal of Business and Management, 18(8), 106-126.
  40. Republic Act 9155. An act instituting a framework of governance for basic education, establishing authority and accountability,renaming the department of education, culture and sports as the department of education, and for other purposes. www.deped.gov.ph
  41. Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  42. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1987). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Publication Sales, Allyn and Bacon, Longwood Division,7 Wells Avenue, Newton, MA 02159 (Order No. H88511; $34.95)..
  43. Turner, A. (2017). How does intrinsic and extrinsic motivation drive performance culture organizations? https://doi.org.110.1080/2331186x.2017.1337543.
  44. Versland, T. M. (2009). Self-efficacy development of aspiring principals in education leadership preparation programs. Montana State University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/84a9bee7e0592e0444bdb96663d7d325/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  45. Vicera, C. R., & Maico, E. G. (2019). Impact of school heads management styles on the teacher’s instructional competence and school performance. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 45(1), 64-74. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/249336638.pdf
  46. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2015). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes.
  47. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1 Williams, C. (2017). Organization and management: concept and applications.
  48. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2021). The multiple ways of behaving creatively in the workplace: A typology and model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(1), 20-33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.2488