Philippine E-Journals

References:

1. Ambayon, C.M. (2020). Modular-based Approach and Students’ Achievement in Literature. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies. ISSN: 2202-9478
2. Aslam, M. (2014). Capacity Building of Teachers Needs Top Priority. Digital Learning Network. https://digitallearning.eletsonline.com/2014/11/capacity-building-of-teachers-needs-top-priority/
3. Barrow, D. (2017). A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences of Parents of Young Children with Autism Receiving Special Education Services. Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4035. https://doi.org/10.15760/ etd.5919
4. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamin, R., & Bethel,E. C. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243–1289. Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/groups/distance_education/items/itemKey/Q595PPUT
5. Bollinger, D.U. & Martindale, T. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
6. Boyd, R., J.W. Apps. (1980). Redefining the Discipline of Adult Education. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
7. Bruner, J. (1985). Models of the Learner. SAGE Journals https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X014006005
8. Calderon, M., et al. (1998). Effects of Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition on Students Making the Transition from Spanish to English Reading. In The Elementary School Journal, 99, 2, 153-165.
9. Cantrell, S. C., et al. (2013). Patterns of Self-Efficacy Among College Students in Developmental Reading. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(1), 8-34.
10. Castelo, M. (2020). “Understanding Blended Learning: What District Need to Know. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/k12/higher/article/2020/07/understanding-blended-learning-what-districts-need-know-perfcon. (accessed on February 7, 2021).
11. Castroverde, F. & Alcala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teaching amid the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education.
12. Cherry, K. (2020). The Experiential Learning Theory of David Kolb. Retrieved: January 19, 2021. https://www.verywellmind.com/experiential-learning-2795154
13. Christenbury, L. (2011). The Flexible Teacher. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec10/vol68/num04/The-Flexible-Teacher.aspx
14. Cilesiz, S. (2009). Educational Computer Use in Leisure Contexts: A Phenomenological Study of Adolescents’ Experiences at Internet
15. Cafés. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323938
16. Cilesiz, S. (2010). A Phenomenological Approach to Experiences with Technology: Current State, Promise, and Future Directions for Research. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59:487- 510. DOI 10.10007/s11423-010-9173-2
17. Confessore, G. & Park, E. (2004). Factor Validation of the Learner Autonomy Profile and Extraction of the Short Form. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 1(1), 39-58.
18. Crawford, J., et al. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
19. Creech, K. (2014). A phenomenological exploration of teacher experiences in creating and teaching a senior year English transition course. University of Kentucky
20. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications Ltd.
22. Cruickshank, D. et al. (2003). The Act of Teaching. Third Edition. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY. McGraw Hill Companies
23. Dangle, Y.P. & Sumaoang, J.D. (2020). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools.
24. Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the covid-19 pandemic. Prospects 49,91-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
25. Darling-Hammond, L. & Btransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
26. De Villa, J.A., Manalo, F.K.M. (2020). Secondary Teachers’ Preparation, Challenges, and Coping Mechanism in the Pre –
27. Implementation of Distance Learning in the New Normal, pp.144 – 154. ISSN 2651 – 7701 (Paper) ISSN 2651 – 771X(Online) Vol.2,No.3.
28. DepEd Memorandum No. 53, s. 2020. (2020, May 28). Joint implementing guidelines on the 2020 brigada eskwela and oplan balik eskwela relative to the COVID-19 situation (Amending thereby DepEd Memorandum No. 032, s. 2020 titled 2020 Brigada eskwela
29. program implementing guidelines, and DepEd Memorandum No. 014, s. 2020 titled 2020 Oplan Balik Eskwela). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/DM_s2020_053.pd
30. DepEd Order No. 12, s.2020. “Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency”
31. DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020 (2020, June 19). The basic education learning continuityplan. www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/DO_s2020_012.pdf
32. Dewey, J. (1961). Dewey on Education. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, LB875, D3681961X.
33. Duc, T.H. (2012). Designing distance learning for the 21^st century: Constructivism, Moore’s transactional theory and Web 2.0. Blekinge Institute of Technology
34. Duran, L. (2020). Distance Learners’ Experiences of Silence Online: A Phenomenological Inquiry. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 21, No.1.
35. Elliot, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
36. Fagell, P.L. (2020). Career confidential: Teacher wonders how to help students during coronavirus shutdown. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720923799
37. Falsario, M. J. (2011). Thinking Science I workbook on students’ achievement. [Unpublished Master Thesis], Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong City, Phi- lippines.
38. FlipScience. (2020, October 5). ‘Tagapagdaloy’: How Filipino parents can help ensure successful modular distance learning.
39. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science News and Features for the Inquisitive Filipino. 9daloymodular-distance-learning
40. Franzblau, S., & Moore, M. (2001). Socializing efficacy: A reconstruction of self-efficacy theory within the context of inequality. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11(2), 83-96. Gadamer, H. (1960). Truth and Method. Continuum Publishing Group.
41. Gaskell, A., & Mills, R. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: what are the challenges? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Dis- tance and e-Learning, 29:3,190-205, DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2014.993603. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02680513.2014.993603?journalCode=copl20
42. Ghazizadeh, T. & Fatemipour, H. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Learners’ Reading Proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 606-614, 2017. Doi:10.17507/jltr.0803.21.
43. Gonzales, E., et al. (2006). A modular Approach to Writing in the Discipline. Anahaw Enterprises, P.O. Box 126, 3100, Cabanatuan
44. Green, D. (2003). Self-efficacy: A communication model for the development of self-efficacy in the classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 107-116.
45. Hain, L. (2020). Transitions in tumultuous times: Teachers’ experiences with distance learning amidst the covid-19 pandemic. Theses and Dissertations. 3387. https://commons.und.edu/theses/338
46. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
47. Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: an introduction. USA: State University of New York Press.
48. Jayasree, P. (2004). Distance Education and Improvement of Curriculum, P.G (Pedagogics, Vol. Attended Workshop on “Innovative Strategies for the Effective Transaction of instructions, pp 55-59)
49. Joet, G., Usher, E., & Bressoux P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649-663.
50. Jorge, C. (2020, May 27). “Ph Education and the New Normal.” https://opinioninquirer.net/129286/ph-education-and-the-new-normal.
51. Kafle, E.A. (2015). Nursing students with learning disabilities: Perceptions and attitudes regarding the role of disability support program services and access to accomodations. Publication No. 3688171
52. Kakkori, L. & Huttunen, R. (2010). The Sartre-Heidegger Controversy on Humanism and the Concept of Man in Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00680.x
53. Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student assessment in online learning: challenges and effecttive practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 8(3), 199-208.
54. Knapp, J. S. (2006). The home school diner’s guide to workbook and worktext. USA: McGraw Hill Publishing.
55. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56. Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and methods. London: Pearson.
57. Lauer, Q (1967). On evidence. In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.). Phenomenology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
58. Malaya, Blayce (2020). DepEd Distance Learning: Here’s what you need to know. Updated: August 13, 2020. Retrieved: January 19, 2021. https://www.whatalife.ph/deped-distance-learning-heres-what-you- need-to-know/
59. Marciaga, O. (2019). A Phenomenology: Teachers Lived Experiences with Workplace English as a Second Language (ESL) Programs. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
60. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218-227.
61. McCabe, P. (2006). Convincing students they can learn to read: Crafting self-efficacy prompts. The Clearing House, 79(6), 252-257.
62. Menon, S., et al. (2014). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Consciousness and the Self. New Youk, Dordrecht, London: Springer. ISBN 978-81-322-1586-8.
63. Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
64. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Accessed: http://www.c3l.unoldenburg.de/cde/support/readings/moore93.pdf
65. Moore, M.,& Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2^nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
66. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Nardo, M.B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No.10, 1024-1034
68. Nwanko, A.A. (2015). Students’ Learning Experiences and Perceptions of Online Course Content and Interactions. Walden University.
69. Orbe, M.P. (2009). Phenomenology. In S. Littlejohn, & K. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA:
70. SAGE Publications, Inc.
71. Pappas, C. (2015). Differentiated instruction in eLearning: What eLearning professionals should know. https://elearningindustry.com/differentiated-instruction-in-elearning-whatelearning-
72. Reiners, G.M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care,1,1-6. doi:10.4172/2167-1168.1000119
73. Reisetter, M., LaPointe, L.,& Korouska, J. (2007). The impact of altered realities: Implications of online delivery for learners’ interactions, expectations and learning skills. International Journal of Electronic Learning, 6(1), 55-77.
74. Richards, J. (2013). Advantages and disadvantages of using instructional materials in teaching ESL. https://www.professorjackrichards.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-using-instructional-materials-in-teaching-esl/
75. Rizaldo, R. et al. (2007). Comparative effects of modular and traditional methods in teaching Analytic Geometry. A Publication of Research & Educational Development Training Institute, 6.
76. Rockmore, T. (2011). Kant and Phenomenology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77. Sari, I. F., et al. (2018). Blended learning: improving students’ motivation in English teaching and learning process. International Journal of Languages Education and Teaching, vol 6, no. 1.
78. Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(2), 169-171.
79. Shaw, R. (2001). Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology? Health Psychology Update.
80. Shih, R. C. (2010). “Blended Learning using Video-based Blogs: Public Speaking for English as a Second Language Students.”
81. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no.6, pp. 883-897, Doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048.
82. Simui, F., et al. (n.d.) Distance Learners’ Perspective on User-friendly Instructional Materials at the University of Zambia. Institute of Distance Education, University of Zambia. ISSN:2311-1550 Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 90-98
83. Singer, F. M., Stoicescu. (2011). Using blended learning as a tool to strengthen teaching competence. Procedia – Computer Science, vol 3, pp. 1527-1531, 2011.doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.043.
84. Smith, D.W. (2007). Husserl. London-New York: Routledge
85. Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London: Cambridge University Press.
86. Stewart, J.L & Wilkerson, V.L. (1999). A Guide To Teaching With Modules. Hope College
87. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-332.
88. Tomei, L.A. (2006). The impact of online teaching on faculty load: Computing the ideal class size for online courses. Journal of
89. Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 531-541.
90. Tupas, F.P. & Laguda, M.L. (2020). Blended Learning – An Approach in Philippine Basic Education Curriculum in New Normal: A Review of Current Literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5505 - 5512. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081154.
91. Unciano, G. (2010). Learner autonomization in the classroom language learning situation. Unpublished dissertation, Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet.
92. UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
93. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting Confidence in School: Invitations as a Critical Source of the Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Entering Middle School Students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12, 7-16.
94. Vagle, M. D. (2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
95. Van Manen, M. & Adam, C. (2010). Phenomenology. ResearchGate. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-44894-7.015396. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298487738_Phenomenology
96. Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
97. Wang, A. & Newlin, M. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of educational psychology, 92,1,137-143.
98. Yuksel, P. & Yildirim, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 6(1):1=20. https://doi10.17569/tojqi.59813
99. Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press
100. Zamir, Shazia (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching at University Level. Department of Education. National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad. ISSN:2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.5, No.17.