HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 5 (2024)

Morphologic Segmentation Linearity in Aesop’s Fable the Farmer and the Snake

Thea Tanya Magdato

Discipline: history of art, architecture and design

 

Abstract:

This study analyzes the textuality of Aesop’s fable “The Farmer and The Snake” focusing on the analyses of its morphologic segmentation linearity. This study utilizes structural analysis as the method in analyzing data. Findings reveal that the linear morphologic segmentation of morphemic contents of Aesop’s fable “The Farmer and the snake” reveals thirty-two (32) lexical morphemes of eleven (11) simple form(roots) and twenty-one (21) complex forms (roots and affixations) and sixteen (17) grammatical morphemes broken down as follows: six (5) prepositions, five (5) pronouns, one (1) conjunction, one (1) particle, two (2) determiners, and three (3) auxiliaries. Based on the findings, it can be said that Aesop’s fable follows morphologic segmentation linearity as shown above based on its textuality. It is recommended that second language instruction should include linear morphologic analysis of the segmentation of the content and function words in varied textualities to aid vocabulary development. Further, it is proposed that the other linguistic investigations like the syntactic and phonetic morphologic segmentation linearity should also be done to better analyze and understand the textuality of Aesop’s fable “The Farmer and The Snake”



References:

  1. Benoist, J. M. (1978). The Structural Revolution. Trans. A. Pomerans. London: Widenfeld and Nicolson.
  2. Colman, M. (2015). Linear Grammar. Oxford Dictionary of Psychology (4th ed). Oxford University Press.
  3. Corder, S. (2003). Introducing Applied Linguistics. Great Britain: Penguin. de la Pena, M. M. (2019). INTRODUCTION:
  4. MORPHOLOGIC AND PHONOLOGIC ANALYSIS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH. ISSN: 0975-833X: Vol. 11, Issue, 10, pp.7915-7924. https://journalcra.com/sites/default/files/issue-pdf/35695.pdf
  5. Greenberg, J. (2002). Essays in Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Horgan, J. (2014, March 08). Aesop’s Fables. World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.worldhistory.org/article/664/aesops-fables/
  7. Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Pergamon Press, New York.
  8. Loeb, S.J., Dynarski, S.M., McFarland, D.A., Morris, P., Reardon, S.F., & Reber, S.J. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
  9. Lyons, J. (1998). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Mathews, P.H. (2004). Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word-Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Merchand, H (2009). The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-Formation. Munich: Beck.
  12. Morrow, D. G. (1986). Grammatical morphemes and conceptual structure in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(4), 423–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80012-X
  13. Parker, F. & Riley K. (2004). Linguistics for Non-Linguists. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  14. Quebec, J.C. (2022). Morphologic Segmentation Linearity in Jose Garcia Villa’s PROEM. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic.
  15. Whitehall, H. (2001). The Structural Essentials of English. USA: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
  16. Syntactic structure (2011). American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, Accessed 31 Aug 2017 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Syntactic+structure
  17. Voleti, K. (2023). Morphological Segmentation. Kiranvoleti.com: Digital Marketing Scientist. https://kiranvoleti.com/morphological-segmentation