HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 10 (2024)

Modeling Network- Based CAD Checker Management System

Krizzie Joy Cailing

Discipline: Information Technology

 

Abstract:

This study concentrates on creating and assessing a Network-Based Computer-Aided Drawing (CAD) Checker Management System at Cebu Technological University-Main Campus for 2023-2024. Based on the evaluation of ISO 25010 standards, examine the development process and measure acceptability through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The research explores user demographics, technical requirements, and acceptability in line with ISO 25010 standards, utilizing a mixed-methods approach involving surveys and discussions for a thorough evaluation. Findings indicate a youthful user demographic with diverse academic backgrounds, showcasing strong acceptance across user categories. The system's technical aspects, encompassing design, content, and functionality, align with industry standards. The study recommends system integration, emphasizing its potential to enhance computer-aided drawing and instructional document management, fostering innovation and excellence at the university. The constructs used for assessment include perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention to use, and actual system use within the TAM framework.



References:

  1. Abdulwahab, S., & Usman, A. (2014). Competencies required by technical drawing teachers in technical colleges. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(2), 32-37.
  2. Aquino, R. (2018). Development of Computer-Based Tests Mode of Assessment for Technical Drafting Students. Journal of Advance Studies, 1(1), 1-3.
  3. Breedveld, Ruud. “Samenwerken En Keteninformatisering in De Zorg − Een Verkennende Studie.” 2016, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74509462.pdf.
  4. Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 523-548.
  5. Chedi, J. M. (2015). Technical drawing/graphic skills acquisition for teaching and learning and challenges in technology education. Citation audit. https://www.windowstips.net/2022/02/how-to-calculate-weighted-average-in.html
  6. Deo (2010). AutoCAD Grading Application: Back End. (Master’s thesis, San Diego State University, 2010). San Diego
  7. Elom, E. N. (2014). Effective Teaching and Learning in Technical Colleges: Challenges of Technical Drawing. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research, 1(1), 76-86.
  8. Finnell, J. (2013). Records Management Theory’s Dilemma. Records Management Journal, 23(2), 122-139.
  9. Halim, L., Yasin, R. M., & Ishar, A. (2012). Camed: An innovative communication tool in teaching engineering drawing. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 9(2), 58-67.
  10. Ingale, S. S. (2017). Development of CAD Platform Independent Software for Automatic Grading of Technical Drawings (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). ISO 25000. (2018). ISO/IEC 25010. Retrieved February 6, 2019 ISO/IEC 25010 Software Quality Standard. https://thetechnologyvault.com/iso-25010-software-quality-standard
  11. Jansen, B. J., & Rieh, S. Y. (2010). The seventeen theoretical constructs of information searching and information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1517-1534.
  12. Karna, S. T. (2012). Enhanced AutoCAD Grading Application: Backend Component (Unpublished master’s thesis). San Diego StateUniversity.
  13. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Mojibur Rohman, M., Sudjimat, D. A., Sugandi, M., & Nurhadi, D. (2019). Developing an interactive digital book to improve the technical drawing abilities of mechanical engineering students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 239-244.
  15. Nematovich, V. A. Z., & Karimberdiyevich, S. S. (2022). Teaching perspective based on innovative technologies.
  16. Obaid, F. (2014). Pedagogical & Didactical Innovations Evaluation and Assessment of Students Learning. Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory Research, 2(5), 1-7. doi: dx.doi.org/14.9831/1444-8939.2014/2-5/MAGNT.1
  17. Obilor, E. I., & Amadi, E. C. (2018). Test for significance of Pearson’s correlation coefficient. International Journal of Innovative Mathematics, Statistics & Energy Policies, 6(1), 11-23.
  18. Oyebode, O. J., Adebayo, V. B., & Olowe, K. O. (2015). Assessment of the use of AutoCAD package for teaching and learning
  19. engineering drawing in Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti. Assessment Of The Use Of Autocad Package For Teaching And Learning Engineering Drawing In Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti, 4(9), 1-8.
  20. Quelhas, Rosário, et al. “Contribution of ICT to Improve Learning of People with Special Educational Needs: A Comparative
  21. Perspective between Public School and Private School.” 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211281.
  22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press
  23. Rosaroso, R. C., & Rosaroso, N. A. (2015). Performance-based Assessment in Selected Higher Education Institutions in Cebu City, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(4), 2015th ser., 72-77
  24. Schotte, Simone. “Poverty, Social Mobility, and the Middle Class: The Case of South Africa.” 2018, https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-7077.
  25. Tuckwiller, B. L., (2012). Teacher Perspectives on Performance Based Student Assessment in Career and Technical Education in West
  26. Virginia, Public Schools Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 313.
  27. Zhang, M. (2013). Contrasting Automated and Human Scoring of Essays. Educational Testing Service, 21. Retrieved February 6,2019, fromhttp://origin-