Tulfo and Chill: Perceptions of Conflict Resolution in Tabloid-Arbitration Shows

Apreal Chae  D. Alonzo,; Jelcia Mae  I. Rañeses,; John Ken  S. Domingo,; Raizette Jhen  G. Victoria,; Ronelyn Karelle  Y. Balingit,

Tulfo and Chill: Perceptions of Conflict Resolution in Tabloid-Arbitration Shows

Apreal Chae D. Alonzo | Raizette Jhen G. Victoria | Jelcia Mae I. Rañeses | John Ken S. Domingo | Ronelyn Karelle Y. Balingit

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

Abstract:

Tabloid-arbitration shows such as Raffy Tulfo in Action and Face 2 Face have emerged as influential platforms in Philippine media, blending public service with entertainment. This study explores how these programs shape viewers’ perceptions of justice and conflict resolution, particularly among heavy viewers. Employing a qualitative design, the study focused on ten participants purposely selected from socioeconomic class D. These individuals were aged 31 to 55 and had a monthly household income ranging from ?24,164 to ?48,328. All participants had consistently engaged with these shows for at least one year. Data collection involved a demographic profile form and semi-structured interviews to uncover deep insights into conflict resolution. To enhance reliability and validity, the researchers utilized member checking, triangulation with a lawyer and psychologist, and consultation with a critical friend. Thematic analysis was used to examine emerging patterns. The findings reveal that tabloid-arbitration significantly influences how viewers perceive and engage with justice. Participants reported viewing these programs as faster, more accessible, and emotionally resonant alternatives to the formal legal system. Many preferred media-mediated justice over traditional legal processes, citing greater relatability and perceived fairness. These results underscore the media's decisive role in shaping public understanding of legal and social issues. The study offers valuable implications for media practitioners, legal educators, and policymakers, suggesting a need for responsible content creation and public education to address potential misconceptions about justice and legal procedures.

References:

Albert, J. R., Santos, A. G., & Vizmanos, J. F. (2018). Defining and profiling the middle class (PIDS Policy Note No. PN 2018-18). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://tinyurl.com/5n7sndy3
Balita, C. (2022). Breakdown of video consumers in Philippines 2020, by age group and platform. Statista. https://tinyurl.com/58vcjepe
Bhandari, P. (2020). What is qualitative research? Methods & examples. Scribbr. https://tinyurl.com/2a6ntf7y
Black, J., & Bryant, J. (1992). Introduction to mass communication. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Cusay, D. (2019). The Tulfo justice and why that should bother us. https://tinyurl.com/4hvdy36f
Eugenio, A. (2020). Why Filipinos seek Raffy Tulfo for help. Spot.ph. https://tinyurl.com/u855b4vx
Friedman, L. M. (2012). Judge Judy’s justice. Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38QH0Z
Garcia, J. L. (2023). Are you not entertained? bworldonline.com. https://tinyurl.com/ye245yw3
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x
Gregori-Signes, C. (2000). The tabloid talkshow as a quasi-conversational type of face-to-face interaction. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.2.02gre
Insight Management Academy. (n.d.). What is insight? Insight Management Academy. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5aeduupp
Kabanos, R. (2023). Raffy Tulfo in action: How one show is empowering ordinary people and making an impact on Philippine society. https://tinyurl.com/555fr6d7
Kimball, P. Z. (2005). Syndi-court justice: Judge Judy and exploitation of arbitration - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 4, No. 1. Journal of American Arbitration (JAA), 4(1). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2ues4szx
Krakus, A. (2012). I hereby find you guilty of cheating: How television judges give personal problems legal dimensions. In: Gisler, P., Borella, S.S., Wiedmer, C. (eds) Intersections of Law and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28500-3_4
Lao, G. (2019). The Tulfos are the face of Philippine justice, and that should bother us. ABS-CBN News. https://tinyurl.com/mr2vfjpw
McGrath, J. (n.d.). Do courtroom dramas change people’s understanding of the law? HowStuffWorks. https://tinyurl.com/zr96zbmc
McKown, M. (2015). From the stocks, to handcuffs, to Hollywood: An analysis of public humiliation in Judge Judy’s syndi-court. Journal of Public Law and Policy, 36(2), Article 3. https://tinyurl.com/3cwkn8zm
Mustafa, Z. (2022). What are the health effects of watching television? News-Medical. https://tinyurl.com/52h4pfe9
Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). What is purposive sampling? | Definition & examples. Scribbr. https://tinyurl.com/zvsst3x2
Shelton, D. E. (2008). The ‘CSI effect’: Does it really exist? National Institute of Justice Journal, Vol. 259. https://tinyurl.com/2mmpvzn5
Tabernero, G. (2013). Ang marhinalisasyon, at potensyal na kapangyarihan ng mga konstrak ng pagkababae na nakapaloob sa programang Face to Face (Master’s thesis). De La Salle University. https://tinyurl.com/3rw3wcap
Timberg, B. M., & Erler, B. (2002). Television talk: A history of the TV talk show. University of Texas Press.
Vogel, R. J. (2012). To teach and to please: Reality TV as an agent of societal change (Bachelor’s thesis, Boston College). https://tinyurl.com/3kzkj3b4