Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 20 no. 9 (2024)

Dynamic Learning Program and its Effect on Students’ Mathematics Achievement

Alduin Copioso | Aris Lapada

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study sought to determine the effects of Dynamic Learning Program (DLP) to the mathematics achievement of Grade 11 students in Alugan National School of Craftsmanship and Home Industries. Quantitative research method and quasi-experimental design were utilized in this study. Two sections of Grade 11 students participated in this study as part of the control group and experimental group, each composed of twenty-three (23) students. The control group was taught using traditional method and the experimental group was taught using DLP. The performance of two groups were measured and compared using a researcher-made pretest and posttest. Results revealed that the use of dynamic learning program in teaching mathematics can improve students’ learning. Although learning took place in both groups taught using the traditional method and DLP, the students who are exposed to dynamic learning program have higher learning gains and performed better than the students who are taught using traditional method.



References:

  1. Abarquez, E. (2020). The Use of Manipulative in Teaching Elementary Mathematics. International Journal of Linguistics,  Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(11). DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.11.3
  2. Aguhayon, H.G., Tingson, & Pentang, J.T. (2023). Addressing Students Learning Gaps in Mathematics through Differentiated  Instruction. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4 (1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.53378/352967
  3. Alawdi, A. M. (2023). The Impact of Schema Theory on Improving University Students’ Writing Performance. Journal of Social  Studies, 29(2), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v29i2.2117 
  4. Albay, E. (2020). Towards a 21st Century Mathematics Classroom: Investigating the Effects of the Problem-Solving Approach Among  Tertiary Education Students. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(2), 69–86. 
  5. Alessa, I.A. & Hussein, S. (2023. Using Traditional and Modern Teaching Methods on the Teaching Process from Teachers’ Own  Perspective. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 10(2), 65-92. 
  6. Amineh R. J. & Asl H.D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences,  Literature and Languages, 1, 9-16. https://www.academia.edu/download/51548785/construtivisim_and_social_C.pdf
  7. Antonio, J.M. & Tamban, V. (2022). Effectiveness of Gamification on Learner’s Performance and Attitude towards  Mathematics Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 3(3), 91-100 
  8. Azucena, L.; Gacayan, P.; Tabat, M. A. S.; & Cuanan, K.; Pentang, J. (2022). GeoGebra intervention: How have students’  performance and confidence in algebra advanced? Studies in Technology and Education, 1(1), 51-61.  https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v1i1.17
  9. Barana, A.; Boetti, G.; Marchisio, M. Self-Assessment in the Development of Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills. Educ. Sci.  2022, 12(81), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020081
  10. Bature, I.J. (2020). The Mathematics Teachers Shift from the Traditional Teacher-Centered Classroom to a More  Constructivist Student- Centered Epistemology. Open Access Library Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106389
  11. Brezavšček A., Jerebic J., Rus G., & Žnidaršič A. (2020). Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement of University Students of  Social Sciences. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122134 
  12. Bruner J. (1973). Going Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton.
  13. Callaman, R. A. & Itaas, E. C. (2020). Students’ mathematics achievement in Mindanao context: A meta-analysis. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(2), 148-159.  https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10282htt 
  14. Chand S., Chaudhary K., Prasad A. & Chand V. (2021). Perceived Causes of Students’ Poor Performance in Mathematics: A  Case Study at Ba and Tavua Secondary Schools. Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 1-11..doi:10.3389/fams.2021.614408 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fams.2021.614408/full
  15. CNN Philippines (2020). PH Grade 4 students worst in math and science proficiency: study http://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2020/12/10/PH-Grade-4-students-worst-in-math-and-science-proficiency--study-.html
  16. Copioso A.; Catuday R.; Germano J.; Jatulan P.J.; Labena J.M.; Mengote J. (2023). Determinants of Numeracy Skills Among  Junior High School Students. Pinagpala Publishing Services, 3. 
  17. Diamante, R. & Banca, N. (2021). Learning Styles and Skills in General Mathematics Using Alternative Delivery Mode in  Relation to Mathematics Performance. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 2(8), 81-87. 
  18. Doño, M.J. & Maugila, B. (2021). Mathematics Teacher’s Engagement and Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics. Journal of  Mathematics Education, 10(2), 285- 300. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2
  19. Emanet, E.A. (2021). The effects of student-centered teaching methods used in mathematics courses on mathematics  achievement, attitude, and anxiety: a meta-analysis study. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(2), 240-259.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.38.8.2
  20. Evardo M. (2023). Dynamic Learning Program: Perspectives and Academic Performance. Eur. Chem. Bull, 7, 5725 – 572.  https://www.eurchembull.com/uploads/paper/4346b1f77632c5874ec8010dd68a2d85.pdf
  21. Ganal, N. & Guiab, M. (2020). Teaching Strategies and Social Support on Students’ Mathematics Achievement,  Attitude, and Anxiety. ATIKAN: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 10(1). 1-22
  22. Garzon, J. & Casinillo, L. (2021). Visualizing Mathematics: The Use of Block Models for Strategic Problem Solving. Journal  of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 112- 117. Accessible from: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE 
  23. Guinocor M., Almerino P., Mamites I., Lumayag C., Villaganas M., & Capuyan M. (2020). Mathematics Performance  of Students in a Philippine State University. INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS  EDUCATION, 15, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7859 
  24. Hafeez, M. (2021). A Critical Review on Blended Learning Versus Traditional Lecture Method. International Journal of  Management and Human Science (IJMHS), 5(3), 1- 21
  25. Harper, D. (2023). European education slips downward, according to PISA report by OECD. Whilst many Asian countries have  shown remarkable improvement in reading and mathematics many European countries have fallen behind in educational  standards. https://www.euronews.com/2023/12/05/european-education-slips-downward-according-to-pisa-report-by-oecd
  26. Landicho, R. R. (2021). Factors Affecting Performance in General Mathematics of Grade Eleven Students in  Talumpok Integrated School: Basis for Intervention Activities an Action Research. International Journal of Innovative Science  and Research Technology, 6(1), 618-626. 
  27. Landas, E. C., & Alova, C. A. R. (2022). Effect of localized lesson plans to the interest and performance of pupils in  mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12368 
  28. Lankford, B.A. (2021). Multimedia in Teacher-Directed and Student-Centered Mathematics Classrooms. In: Wen, Y., et al.  Expanding Global Horizons Through Technology Enhanced Language Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational  Technology. Springer, Singapore. 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7579-2_13
  29. Lowenthal, P., & Muth, R. (2008). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of the social and cultural foundations of education, 177-179.  http://patricklowenthal.com/constructivism/
  30. Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & Iksan, Z. H. (2021). Analysis of the factors that influence mathematics achievement in the ASEAN  countries. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 16(1), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5535 
  31. Magayon, V. & Tan, E. (2020). The Road Less Taken: Differentiated Instruction (Di) As Practiced by Grade 7 Mathematics  Teachers in The Philippines. Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(1), 38-57.  https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.41.3857 
  32. Mamolo, A. & Sugano, S.G. (2020). Self-perceived and actual competencies of senior high school students in General  Mathematics. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1779505 
  33. Mervosh, S. (2023). Math Scores Dropped Globally, but the U.S. Still Trails Other Countries. The New York Times.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/05/us/math-scores-pandemic-pisa.html 
  34. OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD  Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en 
  35. OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris,  https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en 
  36. Pentang, J. (2021). Impact assessment and clients’ feedback towards MATHEMATICS project implementation. International  Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.53378/346107 
  37. Pentang, J.; Ibañez, D.; Subia, G.; Domingo, J.; Gamit, A.; & Pascual, L. (2021). Problem- Solving Performance and Skills of  Prospective Elementary Teachers in Northern Philippines. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(1), 122-132. 
  38. Rossi, S.; Xenidou-Dervou, I.; Cipora, K. (2023). Emotions and mathematics: anxiety profiles and their influence on arithmetic  performance in university students. Royal Society Open Science, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230861 
  39. Surur, A. (2020). Thorndike’s Theory for Improving Madrasah Teacher’s Creative Thinking and Publication. Advances  in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 529, 828-839
  40. Tak, C.C.; Eu, L.K.; & Zulnaidi, H. (2022). Measurement Model and Adaptation of Self- Efficacy toward Mathematics  Reasoning among University Students. Asian Social Science and Humanities Journal, 4(1), 37-43.  https://doi.org/10.37698/ashrej.v4i1.114 
  41. Tamayo, S. (2021). Predictive Factors Affecting the Mathematics Performance of K-12 Graduates. International Journal of Arts,  Sciences and Education, 2(1). 71-89. 
  42. Yabo, R. (2020). The Joyful Experience in Learning Mathematics. Southeast Asia Mathematics Education Journal, 10(1), 55-68.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic