Evaluation of Laboratory Services: Environment, Equipment, and Engagement in Science, TLE, and Computer Laboratories of Saint Mary’s University Junior High School
Agnes Madamba | Crisanta Valdez | Jayson Roda | Bryant Derilo
Discipline: Computer Science
Abstract:
This exploratory study evaluated laboratory services in Science, TLE, and Computer laboratories at Saint Mary’s
University Junior High School for the 2024-2025 school year. Employing quantitative (teacher observations and
student surveys) and qualitative methods, the research compares perceptions and observations of laboratory
environment and safety, equipment and resource management, and instruction and student engagement. The study,
involving eight teachers and 261 students, utilized descriptive statistics, t-tests, and thematic analysis, guided by
Activity Theory. Findings indicated generally positive student perceptions but significant teacher-student
discrepancies, especially in the TLE laboratory regarding environment and equipment. Cleanliness and organization
were concerned across all labs, along with outdated equipment and safety issues. The Computer Laboratory was
evaluated most positively. These results indicate a potential disconnect between teacher and student experiences,
particularly in the TLE laboratory, pointing towards key areas for focused intervention. Ultimately, this evaluation
aims to provide evidence-based insights for enhancing laboratory services at Saint Mary’s University Junior High
School, aligning with the institution's commitment to quality education and continuous improvement. In conclusion,
the study revealed generally positive student perceptions alongside significant teacher-student discrepancies,
particularly in the TLE laboratory, highlighting key areas for targeted improvement. Moving forward, it is
recommended that the university prioritize enhancing cleanliness and organization, updating equipment, and
improving communication regarding laboratory practices to optimize the learning environment.
References:
- Anderson, O. W. (2007). Teaching science for all learners. Wadsworth Publishing.
- Billet, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: The social context of training and development. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 198-205.
- Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
- Hashim, N. & Jones, M. (2014). Activity Theory: A framework for qualitative analysis. Faculty of Commerce - Papers.
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- Kyle, W. C., Jr., Abell, S. K., & Shymansky, J. A. (1989). Science education research agenda: An agenda for the future. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(8), 639-658.
- Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441).
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J. (2015). Towards a more social epistemology of science education: The role of argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 183-204.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
- Rauner, F. (2007). Vocational education and training in Europe: Trends, challenges and prospects. European Journal of Education, 42(1), 1-18.
- Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. National Academies Press.
- Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
- Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
- Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Conway, P. (2016). The digital native debate: A critical review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 249-256.
Philippine E-Journals
