Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 39 no. 3 (2025)

Navigating The Abyss: Challenges, Coping Mechanisms and Insights of Science Teachers in Teaching Science to Non-decoder Junior High School Students

Jemina Buagas | Maria Luisa Cabrera

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

In the era of rapid scientific and technological advancement, fostering scientific literacy remains a central goal of education in Southeast Asia. Curricula across the region promote inquiry-based, student-centered learning to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and hands-on exploration. However, these objectives are often out of reach for nondecoding learners—who face significant barriers in accessing Science education. In the Philippines, low reading proficiency remains a critical concern, as reflected in international assessments such as PISA. Despite national literacy initiatives, these students are frequently underserved by traditional, text-heavy instructional methods. This qualitative study explored the challenges, coping mechanisms, and insights of science teachers in teaching non-decoding junior high school students at Alabel National High School, Sarangani Province, Philippines. Using a qualitative research design, data were gathered through focus group discussions, classroom observations, and thematic analysis. Four major themes emerged: Difficulty in Comprehension and Engagement, Behavioral and Emotional Challenges in the Classroom, Adapted Teaching Strategies for Non-Decoding Learners, and Differentiated Instruction for Diverse Learning Needs. Anchored in Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, the study identified key barriers including limited comprehension of scientific terms, time-consuming instructional pacing, and behavioral issues linked to disengagement. In response, teachers implemented adaptive strategies such as multisensory instruction, simplified language, and collaborative learning techniques to bridge comprehension gaps and sustain engagement. Their insights emphasized the importance of inclusive, flexible pedagogy tailored to diverse learner needs. The findings informed the development of context-specific interventions and supported policy recommendations.



References:

  1. Abacejo, D. (2022). Teaching science to struggling readers: A pedagogical approach. Education Publishing House
  2. Acido, J. V., & Caballes, D. G. (2024). Assessing educational progress: A comparative analysis of PISA results (2018 vs. 2022) and HDI Correlation in the Philippines. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0020
  3. Al-Shehri, M. S. (2020). Effect of differentiated instruction on the achievement and development of critical thinking skills among sixth-grade Science students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 77-99.
  4. Alsuwat, S. (2016). Reading difficulties and strategies: A case of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p45
  5. Alsuwat, S., & Young, J. R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Traditional and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289-299. behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The journal of educational research, 111(2), 163-174.
  6. Bello, J., Concon, L., Polache, M. C. C., Ayaton, M. J., Manlicayan, R., Campomanes, J., & Saro, J. (2023). Contextualized and localized Science teaching and learning materials and its characteristics to improve Students’ learning performance. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 77-84.
  7. Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford review of Education, 22(1), 37-61
  8. Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to differentiated instruction affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336-362.
  9. Conner, T. (2016). Relationships: The key to student engagement. International journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 13-22.
  10. Coronado, E. O., & Gabasa, C. G. Conceptual Understanding of Newton’s
  11. Davidsson, E., & Granklint-Enochson, P. (2021). Teachers’ Way of Contextualizing the Science Content in Lesson Introductions. Science Education International, 32(1), 46-54.
  12. Dioneda Jr, I. P. (2019). Localization and contextualization in teaching Biology for grade 7 students of Paliparan National High School for school year 2018–2019. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(3).
  13. Dorman, E. (2015). BUILDING TEACHERS’SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE THROUGH MINDFULNESS PRACTICES. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 17.
  14. Dulay, L (2020) Classroom Behavior and Academic Performance of Public Elementary School Pupils. IJRP 2020, 56(1), 45-78; doi:.10.47119/IJRP100561720201297 EFL Students. EFL Journal, 1(3), 189-202.
  15. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  16. Garwood, J. D., Vernon-Feagans, L., & Family Life Project Key Investigators. (2017). Classroom management affects literacy development of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 123-142.
  17. Gassid, J. (2023). A Systematic Review of Multisensory Instruction Targeted Toward Improving Literacy Rates in Elementary Students.
  18. Geertz, C. (2008). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The cultural geography reader (pp. 41-51). Routledge.
  19. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(3), 39-54.
  20. Guo, D., Zhang, S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2020). Do you get the picture?
  21. Hasanah, I., Anwar, S., & Musthapa, I. (2024). A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH TRENDS ON CONTEXTUAL LEARNING IN SCIENCE EDUCATION. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 15(3), 329-338.
  22. Hepburn, S. J., Carroll, A., & McCuaig, L. (2021, November). Promoting stress management and wellbeing for teachers, A pilot study. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 744227). Frontiers Media SA.
  23. Hepburn, S. J., Carroll, A., & McCuaig-Holcroft, L. (2021). A complementary intervention to promote wellbeing and stress management for early career teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6320.
  24. Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2014). Stress management for teachers: A proactive guide. Guilford Publications.
  25. Hidayah, S., Irhasyuarna, Y., Istyadji, M., & Fahmi, F. (2023). Implementation of merdeka belajar differentiated instruction in Science learning to improve student’ s Science literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9171-9178.
  26. Ho, D. T. K., & Intai, R. (2017). Effectiveness of audio-visual aids in teaching lower secondary Science in a rural secondary school. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 32(91-106).
  27. Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140-148.
  28. Idulog, M. V., Gadiano, R., Toledo, E., Hermosada, M., Casaldon, H., Mariposa, M., ... & Bautista, R. (2023). Filipino Students’ Reading Abilities: A Note on the Challenges and Potential Areas for Improvement. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 233-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.128
  29. Imam, O. A., Mastura, M. A., Jamil, H., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Reading comprehension skills and performance in Science among high school students in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29(1), 81-94.
  30. Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Törmänen, T., Mänty, K., Haataja, E., Ahola, S., & Järvelä, S. (2020, July). A collaborative learning design for promoting and analyzing adaptive motivation and emotion regulation in the Science classroom. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 111). Frontiers Media SA.
  31. Kalyuga, S. (2016). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 801–812.
  32. Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure,
  33. Kaymak, S., Kassymbek, Z., Kalamkas, A., & Saydenov, F. (2021). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Management, 9(6), 495-503.
  34. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  35. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2006). Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of the multidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education. In Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education (pp. 45-91).
  36. Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & De Boer, H.
  37. (2020). The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research papers in education, 35(6), 641-680.
  38. Lozano-Pena, G., Saez-Delgado, F., Lopez-Angulo, Y., & Mella-Norambuena, J. (2021). Teachers’ social–emotional competence: History, concept, models, instruments, and recommendations for educational quality. Sustainability, 13(21), 12142.
  39. Mahendra, I. (2016). Contextual learning approach and performance assessment in mathematics learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 3(3), 7-15.
  40. Makhambetova, A., Zhiyenbayeva, N., & Ergesheva, E. (2021). Personalized learning strategy as a tool to improve academic performance and motivation of students. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 16(6), 1-17.
  41. Mariposa, M., ... & Bautista, R. (2023). Filipino Students’ Reading Abilities: A Note on the Challenges and Potential Areas for Improvement. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 233-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.128
  42. Matusiak, K. K., Heinbach, C., Harper, A., & Bovee, M. (2019). Visual literacy in practice: Use of images in students’ academic work. College & Research Libraries, 80(1), 123.
  43. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005meta-analysis of the effect of graphics on reading comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 2332858420901696
  44. Mishra, L. (2016). Focus group discussion in qualitative research. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 1-5. DOI : 10.5958/2249-5223.2016.00001.2
  45. Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021, June). Creating a supportive classroom environment through effective feedback: Effects on students’ school identification and behavioral engagement. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 661736). Frontiers Media SA.
  46. Mostova, T. O. (2023). PROFESSIONAL FRUSTRATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDY. Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”.
  47. Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The journal of educational research, 111(2), 163-174.
  48. Nishanthi, R. (2020). Understanding of the importance of mother tongue learning. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 5(1), 77-80
  49. Nwoko, J. C., Emeto, T. I., Malau-Aduli, A. E., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2023). A systematic review of the factors that influence teachers’ occupational wellbeing. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(12), 6070.
  50. O’Donnell, A. M., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is collaborative learning? An overview. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 1-15.
  51. Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Differentiated Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms: Implication for Teacher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136-150.
  52. Pan, Y. C. (2020). The effects of pictures on the reading comprehension of low-proficiency Taiwanese English foreign language college students-An action research study.
  53. Parveen, Q., Yousuf, M. I., & Mustafa, S. (2017). An experimental study on the effect of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and students’ perceptions towards cooperative learning. The Anthropologist, 27(1-3), 69-76.
  54. Pasira, I. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of differentiated instruction strategies in diverse classrooms. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(1), 31-36.
  55. Pawilen, G. T. (2023). Science Around Us: Development of a Community-based Science Curriculum for Local Preschools in the Philippines. Unnes Science Education Journal, 12(1). DOI 10.15294/USEJ.V12I1.66040
  56. Pelatero, L. H. (2023). Project AKAY Approach: A Reading Intervention for Non-Readers. Education Reform and Development, 5(1), 24-33.
  57. Pe‐Pua, R., & Protacio‐Marcelino, E. A. (2000). Sikolohiyang pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian journal of social psychology, 3(1), 49-71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054
  58. Perez, R., & Martinez, L. (2019). Practical Learning Strategies for Students with Cognitive Disabilities: Benefits and Pitfalls. Special Education Quarterly, 32(4), 287-303.perspective. Electronic Journal for the integration of Technology in Education, 1(1), 10-19.
  59. Poe, L. F., Brooks, N. G., Korzaan, M., Hulshult, A. R., & Woods, D. M. (2021). Promoting Positive Student Outcomes: The Use of Reflection and Planning Activities with a Growth-Mindset Focus and SMART Goals. Information Systems Education Journal, 19(4), 13-22.
  60. Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217-230.
  61. Praveena, K. R., & Sasikumar, S. (2021). Application of Colaizzi’s method of data analysis in phenomenological research. Med Leg Updat, 21(2), 914-8.
  62. Reeves, P. M., Pun, W. H., & Chung, K. S. (2017). Influence of teacher collaboration on job satisfaction and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 227-236.
  63. Reyes, C., Valmorida, F. M., Alayon, M., Tantog, A. J., Telos, J., & Cabalog, A. (2023). Teachers’ Strategies, Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in helping Struggling Readers during the Pandemic. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), 296-304.
  64. Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (2000). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications
  65. Sarudin, N. A. A., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Multi-sensory approach: How it helps in improving words recognition? Creative Education, 10(12), 3186.
  66. Schwab, S., Markus, S., & Hassani, S. (2024). Teachers’ feedback in the context of students’ social acceptance, students’ well-being in school and students’ emotions. Educational Studies, 50(5), 978-995
  67. Şentürk, C., & Sari, H. (2018). Investigation of the contribution of differentiated instruction into Science literacy. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 197-237.
  68. Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2366.
  69. Smith, H. M. (2023). Increasing Student Engagement and Learning of the Age of Exploration Through Differentiated Instruction and Assessment.
  70. Somantri, S., Mustoip, S., & Mabrur, H. (2024). Implementation of Differentiated Instruction to Address the Diversity of Students’ Academic Abilities in Elementary School Classrooms. JPS: Journal of Primary School, 1(2), 28-35.
  71. Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature
  72. perspective. Electronic Journal for the integration of Technology in Education, 1(1), 10-19.
  73. Sundho, A. N., & Ali, M. A. (2023). Effect of Explicit Teaching Modeling on Academic Achievement of Primary Level Students in Mathematics: An Experimental Study. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(2), 25-35.
  74. Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 291-301.
  75. Swancutt, L., Medhurst, M., Poed, S., & Walker, P. (2020). Making adjustments to curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. In Inclusive education for the 21st century (pp. 208-243). Routledge
  76. Syofyan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2018, July). The impact of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on economics education teaching. In First Padang International Conference On Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2018) (pp. 114-121). Atlantis Press.
  77. Syofyan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2018, July). The impact of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on economics education teaching. In First Padang International Conference On Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2018) (pp. 114-121). Atlantis Press.
  78. Tapia, I. S. (Ed.). (2020). International perspectives on the contextualization of Science education. Springer Nature. The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research papers in education, 35(6), 641-680.
  79. Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom.
  80. Ugwoke, S. C., Eseadi, C., Onuigbo, L. N., Aye, E. N., Akaneme, I. N., Oboegbulem, A. I., ... & Eneh, A. (2018). A rational-emotive stress management intervention for reducing job burnout and dysfunctional distress among special education teachers: an effect study. Medicine, 97(17), e0475.
  81. Valiandes, S., & Neophytou, L. (2018). Teachers’ professional development for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: investigating the impact of a development program on teachers’ professional learning and on students’ achievement. Teacher Development, 22(1), 123-138versus technology-based instruction on reading Comprehension of  
  82. Vestal, P., Kilag, O. K., Alvez, G. G., Escabas, D., Ignacio, R., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Bridging the Literacy Gap: A Multisensory Approach to Effective Intervention. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 156-168.
  83. Woods, D. M. (2020). Using Goal Setting Assignments to Promote a Growth Mindset in IT Students. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(4), 4-11
  84. Zakaria, Z., Care, E., & Griffin, P. (2016). Scaffolding Instruction Where It Matters: Teachers’ Shift from Deficit Approach to Developmental Model of Learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(23), 144-152.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic