Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 23 no. 10 (2024)

Understanding Martin Buber’s “I-Thou” Theory in the Care Coordination of Patients with Mental Illness

Rene Calandria

Discipline: Psychology and Health

 

Abstract:

Care coordination among patients with mental illness can be challenging if not extremely draining and difficult because of the intellectual, social limitations, educational and emotional fragility of the population that healthcare providers must navigate during the care encounter. Both therapeutic and care coordination processes “requires some steady conception of the fully human.” That a successful care coordination needs to have a good understanding of what is meant to be a human person. This is exactly what Buber’s theory of the human person “offers and why his work has proven so valuable to clinicians.” Custodialism has been popular and was considered as the norm for quite some time during the delivery process within the behavioral health units. However, this approach resulted in depersonalization of patients and has encouraged dependency and powerlessness. Today, the new care coordination model calls for the transformation of behavioral units into therapeutic community wherein “the person-to-person encounter is enhanced and sustained through a revitalized institutional environment.” The “I- Thou” theory of Buber presents a scientific and sociological approach that has a deeper implication in clinical practice with greater emphasis on care and rehabilitation rather than control and custody in psychiatric medical treatment.



References:

  1. Abramovitch, H. (2015). The Influence of Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue on Psychotherapy: His Lasting Contribution. In P. Mendes-Flohr (Ed.), Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept: Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception (1st ed., pp. 169–182). De Gruyter. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbj7kb3.13
  2. Agassi, J.B (Editor). (1999). Martin Buber on Psychology and Psychotherapy: Essays, Letters, and Dialogues. Syracuse University Press.
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
  4. Brink, T. L., & Janakes, C. (1979). Buber’s Interpersonal Theory as a Hermeneutic. Journal of Religion and Health, 18(4), 287–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27505526
  5. Buber, Martin. (1958) I and Thou, second edition. (Ronald Gregor Smith, Trans)New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  6. Buber, Martin. (1996). I and Thou (Walter Kaufmann, Trans). New York: Touchstone. (Translation copyright 1970)
  7. Charmé, S. (1977). The Two I-Thou Relations in Martin Buber’s Philosophy. The Harvard Theological Review, 70(1/2), 161–173. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508987
  8. Fink-Sammick, E (2011). Understanding care coordination: Emerging opportunities for social workers. The New Social Worker.  https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles
  9. Flashman, A. J. (2015). Almost Buber: Martin Buber’s Complex Influence on Family Therapy. In P. Mendes-Flohr (Ed.), Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept: Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception (1st ed., pp. 183–198). De Gruyter. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbj7kb3.14
  10. Friedman, M. (1985). The healing dialogue in psychotherapy. Jason Aronson, Inc.
  11. Friedman, M (1992). Dialogue and the human image: Beyond humanistic psychology. Sage Publications, Inc.
  12. Friedman, M. (1965). Martin Buber’s Final Legacy: “The Knowledge of Man.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384249
  13. Gandré, C., Beauguitte, L., Lolivier, A. and Coldefy, M. (2020).  Care coordination for severe mental health disorders: an analysis of healthcare provider patient-sharing networks and their association with quality of care in a French region. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05173-x
  14. Glatzer, N. N. (1981). Aspects of Martin Buber’s Thought. Modern Judaism, 1(1), 1–16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1396370
  15. Habermas, J. (2015). A Philosophy of Dialogue. In P. Mendes-Flohr (Ed.), Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept: Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception (1st ed., pp. 7–20). De Gruyter. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbj7kb3.4
  16. Hollander, R. (1990). Martin Buber’s Relevance to Institutional Mental Health Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 29(3), 193–206. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27506067
  17. Hull, Megan (August 2023). Mental Health Disorder. Retrieved from: https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/mental-health
  18. Hycner, Richard  (1993). Between person and person: Toward a Dialogical Psychotherapy. Gestalt Journal Press.
  19. John Hopkins Medicine. (2023) Mental Health Disorder Statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/mental-health-disorder-statistics
  20. Mio, J., Barker, L., Rodriguez, M., & Gonzales, J.  (2023) Multicultural Psychology, 6th edition.  Oxford University Press.
  21. Kellebrew, Tim  (2020). Brief overview of dialogical psychotherapy. Tilu Press.
  22. Putnam, H. (2008). What I and Thou Is Really Saying. In Jewish Philosophy as a Guide to Life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein (pp. 55–67). Indiana University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt16gz84t.7
  23. Kaufmann, W. (1978). Buber’s failure and triumph.  Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 32(126 (4)), 441–459. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23944134
  24. Pickus, D. (2011). The You That Wasn’t Enough: Walter Kaufmann and Martin Buber. Shofar, 29(4), 98–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5703/shofar.29.4.98
  25. Ravenscroft, Simon (2017) An Analysis of Martin Buber’s I and Thou. New York: Macat International Ltd.
  26. Ress, Jonathan (2010). Understanding Psychotherapy for Trauma with Buber’s I-Thou Philosophy. Saarbrucken, Germany. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  27. Reinert, M., Fritze, D., & Nguyen, T. (October 2022). “The State of Mental Health in America 2022.” Mental Health America (online), Alexandria, Virginia. https://mhanational.org/default/files/2022-state-of-mental-health-in-america.pdf
  28. Santmire, H. P. (1968). I-Thou, I-It, and I-Ens. The Journal of Religion, 48(3), 260–273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1202150
  29. Schilly, J. & Norris, T.  (2022) “Early Release of Selected Estimates Based on Data From the 2022 National Health Interview Survey,” National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/eralyrelease/earlyrelease202304,pdf
  30. Stevenson, W. T. (1963). I-Thou and I-It: An Attempted Clarification of Their Relationship. The Journal of Religion, 43(3), 193–209. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1199933
  31. Terlizzi, E. & Norris, T. (2021). “Mental Health Treatment Among Adults: United States, 2020.” NCHS Data Brief, No. 419.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic