HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 40 no. 3 (2025)

Alignment of Learning Outcomes of Selected Courses in a University in Thailand: Input for Course Mapping and Revision

Emilyn Orlain | Neliza Cayaban | Gliceria Lunag | Rizal Dapat

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Education systems worldwide face pressures to produce graduates that meet the demands of the 21st century workplace. With the curriculum as the heart of the education system, curriculum mapping plays a crucial role in ensuring that course components align with established standards, highlighting areas for improvement such as unclear learning outcomes and misaligned course content and assessment plans. While curriculum mapping has been widely recognized as a tool for ensuring alignment with educational standards, limited research has explored its application at the course level within Business English curricula. Thus, this study aims to assess alignment among three Business English courses for third-year BA in English students at a Thai university using descriptive comparative method and course-level evidence-based mapping. Semantic and content analysis of empirical data helped identify gaps, redundancies, and overlaps among learning outcomes, teaching plan, and assessment plan. The findings reveal varying degrees of alignment across three courses, with emphasis on unclear learning outcomes, redundancies, and misalignments in teaching and assessment plans. Recommendations include revisiting course content, updating materials, linking activities, and refining alignment to improve classroom instruction and enhance education quality.



References:

  1. Al Dera, H. (2021). Curriculum Mapping and Alignment of the Neuroscience Block in an Undergraduate Medical Education Program: A Delphi Study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 567 -575.
  2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
  3. Arafeh, S. (2016). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A case study and proposed content scope and sequence mapping tool. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 585–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000278
  4. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. Https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00139971
  5. Buasuwan, P. (2018). Rethinking Thai higher education for Thailand 4.0. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0072
  6. Cuevas, N. M., Matveev, A. G., & Feit, M. D. (2009). Curriculum Mapping: An Approach to Study Coherence of Program Curricula. Department Chair 20 (1).
  7. Hansen, E. J. (2011). Idea-Based Learning: A Course Design Process to Promote Conceptual Understanding. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  8. Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120036547
  9. Joyner Melito, H. S. (2016). Curriculum Mapping: A Method to Assess and Refine Undergraduate Degree Programs. Journal of Food Science Education, 15(3), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12086
  10. Komenda, M., Víta, M., Vaitsis, C., Schwarz, D., Pokorná, A., Zary, N., & Dušek, L. (2015). Curriculum Mapping with Academic Analytics in Medical and Healthcare Education. PLOS ONE, 10(12), e0143748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143748
  11. Liu, Y., Chen, T.-L., Yueh, H.-P., & Sheen, H.-J. (2014). Exploring Competencies of Nanotechnology in Higher Education in Taiwan through Curriculum Mapping. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 722–728.
  12. Matveev, A. G., Veltri, N. F., Zapatero, E. G., & Cuevas, N. M. (2010). Curriculum Mapping: A Conceptual Framework and Practical Illustration.
  13. Okojie, M. U., Bastas, M., & Miralay, F. (2022). Using Curriculum Mapping as a Tool to Match Student Learning Outcomes and Social Studies Curricula. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 850264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850264
  14. Plaza, C. M., Draugalis, J. R., Slack, M. K., Skrepnek, G. H., & Sauer, K. A. (2007). Curriculum Mapping in Program Assessment and Evaluation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710220
  15. Pornphol, P., & Saejueng, C. (2013). The Information Technology for Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education. The Asian Conference on Society, Education and Technology.
  16. Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice. Educational Researcher, 31.
  17. Priestley, M., & Philippou, S. (2019). Curriculum is – or should be – at the heart of educational practice. The Curriculum Journal, 30(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1598611
  18. Puncreobutr, V. (2018). School-friendly QA: Thailand Education Quality Assurance Reform. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303010.
  19. Tamronglak, A. (2020). Impacts of the Thailand qualification framework–Public administration on public administration education in Thailand. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1771991