Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 38 no. 1 (2025)

Exploring Leadership Styles and Its Influence on Target Outcomes Achievement in Local Colleges

Cristine Perido | Jayvie Bryle C. Camilo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This explanatory-sequential study investigates the dominant leadership styles and their influence on target outcomes achievement among heads of department and/or organization at two local colleges in Cebu, Philippines: Sibonga Community College and Carcar City College. Utilizing the Path-Goal Theory as its theoretical framework, the study employed questionnaires to identify leadership styles and Individual Performance Commitment Review (IPCR) data to assess target outcomes. Subsequent semi-structured interviews explored factors contributing to dominant styles and their perceived influence on outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed Achievement-Oriented and Participative leadership as prevalent, while Supportive leadership was less dominant. IPCR ratings indicated a "Very Satisfactory" level of target outcomes achievement in both institutions. Correlation analysis showed weak and non-significant relationships between the four Path-Goal leadership styles and target outcomes. Qualitative findings identified clear communication, accountability, and mentorship as factors shaping Directive leadership; clear communication, relationship building, and empathy for Supportive leadership; collaboration, empowerment, and open communication for Participative leadership; and developing potential, challenging tasks, and clear expectations for Achievement-Oriented leadership. The perceived influence of these styles on target outcomes varied, with Directive leaders emphasizing clarity and efficiency, Supportive leaders focusing on harmony, Participative leaders on autonomy and collaboration, and Achievement-Oriented leaders on skill development and productivity. Based on these findings, the study proposes a leadership program of extension, "SUPPORT (Strengthening Understanding, People-Oriented, and Resilient Teams)," designed to enhance supportive leadership skills and overall leadership effectiveness in the local college context.



References:

  1. Albritton, R. L., & Shaughnessy, T. W. (1990). Developing leadership skills: A sourcebook for librarians. Libraries Unlimited.
  2. Alaaldin, A., Alrowwad, B., Obeidat, B., Al-Khateeb, A., & Masa’deh, R. (2018). The role of work/life balance and motivational drivers of employee engagement on the relationship between talent management and organization performance: A developing country perspective. Modern Applied Science, 12(11), 1–35.
  3. Beckhard, R., & Pritchard, W. (1992). Changing the essence: The art of creating and leading fundamental change in organizations. Jossey-Bass.
  4. Belás, J. (2013). The impact of directive leadership style on organizational performance. Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 44–56.
  5. Bellman, G. M. (2001). Getting things done when you are not in charge (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  6. Bennis, W. (2003). On becoming a leader (Rev. ed.). Perseus.
  7. Bennis, W., & Nanis, B. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. Harper & Row.
  8. Berry, J. N. (2002). Arizona’s new model. Library Journal, 127(18), 40–42.
  9. Caroselli, M. (2000). Leadership skills for managers. McGraw-Hill.
  10. Chapman, E. N. (1989). Leadership: What every manager needs to know. SRA Pergamon.
  11. Cimene, F. T. (2013). Culture and gender in leadership. LK.
  12. Cimene, F. T. A., & Aladano, A. N. (2013). Leadership perspective from the Philippine. Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), 4(1), 14–35.
  13. Crosby, P. B. (1986). Running things: The art of making things happen. McGraw-Hill.
  14. Evans, M. G. (1970). The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5(3), 277–298.
  15. Gallego, M. (2022, May 25). The Manila Times. The Manila Times.
  16. Gardner, J. W. (1990). On leadership. The Free Press.
  17. Gemeda, H., & Lee, J. (2020). Leadership styles, work engagement, and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national study. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699
  18. House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339.
  19. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.
  20. House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 81–98.
  21. Irada, A. M. (2024). Path goal leadership of school heads and team effectiveness among public secondary teachers in Digos City Division. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(6), 4378–4383. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0624.1562
  22. Lam, L. (2012). Taking the road less traveled.
  23. McClamroch, J., Byrd, J. J., & Sowell, S. L. (2001). Strategic planning: Politics, leadership, and learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(5), 372–378.
  24. Moran, B. B. (1992). Libraries and librarians: Meeting the leadership challenges of the 21st century. University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
  25. Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  26. Nzeneri, N. E. (2020). Path goal leadership effectiveness perception in selected private secondary schools in Rivers State. International Journal of Institutional Leadership, Policy and Management, 2(2), 348–368.
  27. Olowoselu, A., et al. (2019). Path-goal theory and the application in educational management and leadership. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.02.77
  28. Pacia, D., & Guevarra, P. (2023). Influence of path-goal theory of leadership styles and the moderating role of task structure in leadership on teachers’ satisfaction, motivation, and performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2330–2345. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.15
  29. Perryer, C. (2005). The influence of leader behaviors on organizational commitment.
  30. Peters, T., & Austin, N. (1985). A passion for excellence: The leadership difference. Random House.
  31. Regent University. (2020). An investigation of path-goal theory, relationship of leadership style, supervisor-related commitment, and gender. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 13(1), 76–85.
  32. ResearchGate. (2021). Influence of path-goal theory of leadership styles on teachers’ satisfaction, motivation, and performance. Educational Management & Leadership, 49(2), 233–250.
  33. Rhodes, T. A. (2013). Leadership research and presidential research.
  34. Robert, J. H. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
  35. Sheldon, B. E. (1991). Leaders in libraries: Styles and strategies for success. American Library Association.
  36. Terri, & Ford, D. (2013). Exploratory perspectives: Leadership in Uganda, Barbados, Canada, and the USA. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies.
  37. Thanh, N. H., & Quang, N. V. (2022). Transformational, transactional, laissez-faire leadership styles and employee engagement: Evidence from Vietnam’s public sector. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094606
  38. Valldeneu, M., Tarrats, E., & Ferras, X. (2021). Leadership styles and organizational outcomes: A study across international hubs. Organization Development Journal, 39(1), 13–22. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350448843_Leadership_styles_and_organizational_outcomes_A_study_across_international_hubs#full-text
  39. Winston, M. D. (Ed.). (2001). Leadership in the library and information science professions: Theory and practice. Haworth Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic