Home⇛Annals of Tropical Research⇛vol. 33 no. Supplemental (2014)

Indigenous Knowledge, Agricultural Practices and Adaptation in the Marginal Uplands: The Case of Brgy. Linao, Inopacan, Leyte

Jedess Miladel N. Salomon | Annabella B. Tulin | Janice Marie S. Monderondo

 

Abstract:

This study documented how upland farm households make use of the available, albeit meager, resources in their environment. Through focus groups discussions, household interviews and observation, it attempts to understand how they make use of their intimate knowledge of their surroundings to make a livelihood. More than half of the 30 households included in the studywere tenants. Their agricultural practiceswere based on traditional beliefs and years of observation and experience on when to plant, how to ensure a bountiful harvest, soil management and pest control. Cropswhich are drought-resistant and require no agro-chemicals were preferred. Moreover, they classified soil based on color and texture. This was their guide in planting certain crops in each type of soil. It was common for them to have two or more sources of income because farm produce was not enough to meet their basic needs. These include wage laboringandselling of goods. This case study illustrates the importance of indigenous or local knowledge to agriculture by providing farm households with adaptive strategies. It is therefore important that this knowledge system be taken into account in the development and implementation of programs which aim to improve the agricultural and economic productivity of farm households inmarginal uplands.



References:

  1. AJANI, E.N., R.N. MGBENKA and M.N. OKEKE. 2013. Use of indigenous knowledge as a strategy for climate change adaptation among farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for policy. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology 2(1):23-40.
  2. ASIO, V.B. 2013. Marginal uplands: current research initiatives at VSU. Retrieved September 20, 2013 from http://soil-environment.blogspot.com/2013/03/marginal-uplands-current-research.html
  3. BARRERA-BASSOLS, N. and J.A. ZINCK. 2003. Ethnopedology: a worldwide view on the soil knowledge of local people. Geoderma 111:171-195.
  4. BROWN, L.R. 2012. Full planet, empty plates: the new geopolitics of food scarcity. Retrieved October 14, 2013 from http://www.earth-policy.org/books/fpep/fpepch5
  5. GMELCH, G. 2000. Baseball magic. In: Conformity and conflict: reading in cultural anthropology 11th ed (J. Spradley & D. McCurdy eds.). Allyn & Bacon, U.S.A.
  6. HART, T. and I. VORSTER. 2006. Indigenous knowledge on the South African landscape: potentials for agricultural development. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) Press, Cape Town, South Africa.
  7. KRASILINIKOV, P. and J. TABOR. n.d. Ethnopedology and soil folk taxonomies. Soils, plant growth and crop production 3. Retrieved September 21, 2013 from http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c10/E1-05A-35-00.pdf
  8. LAVENDA, R.H. and E.A. SCHULTZ. 2003. Core concepts in cultural anthropology, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, U.S.A.
  9. MATANMI, B.M. 2001. Indigenous knowledge in agricultural production in Northern Nigeria: the use of astronomy. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/publications/matanmi/Indigenous_knowledge_in_agricultural_production_in_northern_nige ria.pdf
  10. MOTSUMI, S., L. MAGOLE and D. KGATHI. 2012. Indigenous knowledge and land use policy: Implications for livelihoodsof flood recession farming communities in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 50-52:185-195.
  11. NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE (NSO). 2010. 2010 census of population and housing. Retrieved September 26, 2013 from http://www.census.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pre ssrelease/Eastern%20Visayas.pdf
  12. RAO, V.L.N. and G.V. RAMANA. 2007. Indigenous Knowledge, Conservation and Management of Natural Resources among Primitive Tribal Groupsof Andhra Pradesh.Anthropology today: trends, scope and applications 3:129-134. Retrieved September 17, 2013 from http://www.krepublishers.com/06-Special%20Volume-Journal/T-Anth-00-Special%20Volumes/T-Anth-SI-03-Anth-Today-Web/Anth-SI-03-11-Rao-V-L-N/Anth-SI-03-11-Rao-V-L-N-Tt.pdf
  13. SAITO, K., B. LINQUIST, B. KEOBUALAPHA, T. SHIRAIWA & T. HORIE. 2006. Farmers’ knowledge of soils in relation to cropping practices: a case study of farmers in upland rice based slash-and-burn systems of northern Laos. Geoderma 136:64-74.
  14. SILLITOE, P. 1998. The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology 39(2):223-252.
  15. SILLITOE, P. & M. MARZANO. 2009. Future of indigenous knowledge research in development. Futures 41:13-23.
  16. STIFEL, D., M. FAFCHAMPS & B. MINTEN. 2009. Taboos, agriculture and poverty. University of Oxford.
  17. THIERFELDER, C. & P.C. WALL. n.d. The importance of crop rotations. CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. Retrieved October 10, 2013 from http://www.wiso.boku.ac.at/fileadmin/_/H73/H733/Mozambique/CIMMYT_ExtBulletins02.pdf
  18. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA). 1996. Soil
  19. quality indicators: organic matter.
  20. YULE, E.S. n.d. Some superstitions and customs of Filipino farmers. Retrieved October 10, 2013 from http://archive.org/stream/jstor-29738348/29738348_djvu.txt

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic