HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 33 no. Supplemental (2014)

Biomass Production, Carbon Stock, and Carbon Sequestration of Dipterocarps at Seedling Stage in Response to Light and Nutrient Availability

Marlito M. Bande | Renezita S. Come | Sheilyn E. Abad | Jimmy O. Pogosa | Hernando L. Mandal | Fidelito M. Almeroda | Elmer M. Napoles

 

Abstract:

Presently, there are only a few scientific studies conducted to determine the certified emission reduction (CER) potential of native trees and in promoting the use of dipterocarps in restoring degraded marginal uplands. This study was conducted to determine the biomass production, carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential of dipterocarp seedlings at the hardening stage in the nursery prior to out-planting in response to light and nutrient availability. There were four dipterocarp species used, namely: Shorea contorta, Hopea plagata, Shorea polysperma and Hopea philippinensis. A randomized complete block design between light infiltration and fertilizer application was employed in this study using a total of 144 seedlings. Destructive harvesting was done every month for a period of three months. The results of the study showed that there was a significant (p≤ 0.05) effect of light infiltration on biomass production and carbon stock of S. polysperma and H. philippinensis. However, fertilizer applicationonbiomass production, carbon stock and carbon sequestration of the four dipterocarp species being studied yieldednosignificant effect.



References:

  1. AERTS R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: Are there general patterns? Journal of Ecology 84:597-608
  2. AKHTER N, M.M. RAHMAN, M HASANUZZAMAN, and K. NAHAR (2009)
  3. Physiological response of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown under different light environment. Botany Research International 2(4):304-309
  4. ALLEN C.B., R.E. WILL, R.C. MCGARVEY, D.R. COYLE, and M.D. COLEMAN (2004) Radiation-use efficiency and gas exchange responses to water and nutrient availability in irrigated and fertilized stands of sweetgum and sycamore. Tree Physiology 25:191-200
  5. ASIO V.B. 2007. Characteristics, fertility status and management of degraded upland soils in Leyte. PARRFI Professional Chair Papers: 1992-2006. Philippine Agriculture Resource Research Foundation In. (PARRFI), Los Baños, Laguna.
  6. ASIO V.B., R. JAHN, F.O. PEREZ, I.A. NAVARRETE and S.M. ABIT, Jr. 2009. A Review of soil degradation in the Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research 31:69-94.
  7. BALSTER N.J. and J.D. MARSHALL. (2000) Eight-year responses of light interception, effective leaf area index, and stemwood production in fertilized stands of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca). Can. J. For. Res. 30:733-743
  8. BALZER, P. and J. MARGRAF. 1994. Recent rainfall trends in ViSCA, Baybay, Leyte, Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research 16 (4), 32-42
  9. BJÖRKMAN O., and P. HOLMGREN. (1966) Photosynthetic adaptation to light intensity in plants native to shaded and exposed habitats. Physiol. Plant. 19:854-889
  10. BJÖRKMAN 0. (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, vol. XII A, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp37-107
  11. BOARDMAN N.K. (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:355-377
  12. BROWN, S., SWINGLAND, I.R., HANBURY-TENISON, R., PRANCE, G.T. and MYERS, N. 2002. Changes in the use and management of forests for abating carbon emissions: issues and challenges under the Kyoto Protocol. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 360: 1593-1605
  13. BUISSON D., and D.W. LEE (1993) The developmental responses of papaya leaves to simulated canopy shade. Am. J. Bot. 80:947-952
  14. CALISKAN O., M.S. ODABAS, and C. CIRAK (2009) The modelling of the relation among the temperature and light intensity of growth in Ocimum basilicum L. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 3(11):965-977
  15. CANNELL M.G.R. (1985) Physiology of coffee crop. In: Clifford MN, Wilson KC (eds) Coffee botany, biochemistry and production of beans and beverages, London, Croom Helm, pp108-124.
  16. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). 2011. Executive Order No. 26, National Greening Program, accessed 10 August 2012 http://ngp.denr.gov.ph/.
  17. DURIYAPRAPAN S., and E.J. BRITTEN (1982) The effects of solar radiation on plant growth, oil yield and oil quality of Japanese mint. Journal of Experimental Botany 33(137):1319-1324
  18. EVANS J.R. (1983) Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum eastivum L.). Plant Physiol. 72:297-30
  19. FIELD C., and H.A. MOONEY (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationships in wild plants. In: Givinish TJ (ed) On the economy of form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp25-55
  20. GARRITY, D.P., D.M. KUMAR and E.S. GUIANG. 1993. The Philippines. In: Committee on Sustainable Agriculture and Environment in the Humid Tropics. BOSTID. NRC. Washington. D.C.
  21. GERIK T.J., D.M. OOSTERHUIS and H.A. TORBERT (1998) Managing cotton nitrogen supply. Adv. Agron. 64:115-147
  22. GOLTSEV V., I.ZAHARIEVA, P. LAMBREV, I. YORDANOV, and R. STRASSER (2003) Simultaneous analysis of prompt and delayed chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaves during the induction period of dark to light adaptation. J. Theoretical Biol. 225:171-183
  23. GREGORIO, N.O., VANCLAY, J. and HERBOHN, J.L. 2009. Establishing field trials to promote smallholder forestry in Leyte, The Philippines. In S.R. Harrison, A. Bosch, J. Herbohn and E. Mangaoang (eds) Proceedings from the End-of-Project Workshop held in Ormoc City, the Philippines. ACIAR Smallholder Forestry Project: Improving Financial Returns to Smallholder Tree Farmers in the Philippines, End-of-Project Workshop, Sabin Resort Hotel, Ormoc City, Leyte, (75-82). 11-12 February 2009.
  24. GREGORIO, N.O., HERBOHN, J.L., and VANCLAY, J. K. 2012. Developing establishment guidelines for Shorea palosapis in smallholder plantings in the Philippines. International Forestry Review Vol.14(4), 2012
  25. HARRISON, S., EMTAGE, N.F. and NASAYAO, Ε.Ε. 2004. Past and present forestry support programs in the Philippines, and lessons for the future. Small-Scale Forestry 3:303-317.
  26. HERBOHN, J., GREGORIO, N. and VANCLAY, J. 2009a. Rationale and key research questions addressed by field trails established as part of the ACIAR Smallholder Tree Farmer Project. In: S. Harrison, A. Bosch, J. Herbohn and E. Mangaoang (eds) ASEM/2003/052 Improving Financial Returns to Smallholder Tree Farmers in the Philippines End-of-Project Workshop held in Ormoc City, the Philippines, 11-12 February 2009. pp. 67-74.
  27. HOLMGREN P. (1968) Leaf factors affecting light-saturated photosynthesis in ecotypes of Solidago_virgaurea_from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol. Plant. 21:676-698
  28. ISAAC M.E., V.R. TIMMER, and S.J. QUASHIE-SAM. (2007) Shade tree effects in an 8-year-old cocoa agroforestry system: biomass and nutrient diagnosis of Theobroma cacao by vector analysis. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Springer Science-Business Media, B.V. doi:10705-006-9081-3
  29. JOHNSON, I. and R. COBURN, F. 2010. Trees for carbon sequestration, Climate in Primary Industries, Forest Science Centre, West Pennant Hills (accessed Jan.6, 2014)
  30. KAMALUDDIN M., and J. GRACE. (1992) Photoinhibition and light acclimation in seedlings of Bischofia javanica, a tropical forest tree from Asia. Annals of Botany 69:47-52
  31. KEMANIAN A.R., C.O .STÖCKLE, and D.R. HUGGINS (2004) Variability of barley radiation-use efficiency. Crop Sci. 44:1662-1672
  32. LAL, R. 1998. Soil Quality and Sustainability, In: Methods in Assessment of Soil Degradation. Advances in Soil Science. CRC Pren, BOCA Ration. pp.17-30.
  33. LASCO, R.D. and B.F. PULHIN. 1998. Philippine Forestry and Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Change Sequestration Opportunities for Mitigating Climate
  34. LASCO, R.D. and B.F. PULHIN. 2003. Philippine forest ecosystems and climate change: Carbon stocks, rate of sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol.
  35. LAMBERS H., F.S. CHAPIN, and T.L. PONS (1998) Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer-Verlag New York, USA
  36. MANGAOANG, E.O. 2002. A forester’s perspective of the socio-economic information requirements for forestry in Leyte. In: S. Harrison, J. Herbohn, E. Mangaoang and J. Vanclay (eds), Socio-economic Research Methods in Forestry: A Training Manual, Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Rainforest CRC, Cairns, pp. 1-14.
  37. NELSON, R.A. 1994. Soil erosion and conservation in the Philippine uplands. A review of literature. SEARCA - UQ Uplands Research Project
  38. NILES, J.O., BROWN, S., PRETTY, J., BALL, A.S. and FAY, J. 2002. Potential carbon mitigation and income in developing countries from changes in use and management of agricultural and forest lands. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 360: 1621-1639
  39. OSMOND, C.B., 1994. What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparison of shade and sun plants, in: Baker, N.R., Bowyer, J.R. (Eds.), Photoinhibition of photosynthesis-from molecular mechanisms to the field, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Lancaster, pp. 1-24.
  40. OSUNKOYA, O.O., ASH, J.E., HOPKINS, M.S., and GRAHAM, A.W. 1994. Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in Northern Queensland. Journal of Ecology 13, 149-163.
  41. POORTER, L., VAN DER WERF, A., ATKIN, O.K., and LAMBERS, H. 1991. Respiratory energy requirements of roots vary with the potential growth rate of a plant species. Physio. Plant. 83:469-475
  42. POORTER, L. and OBERBAUER, S.F. 1993. Photosynthetic induction responses of two rainforest tree species in relation to light environment. Oecologia 13, 193-199.
  43. POPMA, J., and BONGERS, F. 1988. The effect of canopy gaps on growth and morphology of seedlings of rainforest species. Oecologia 13, 625-632
  44. POWLES, S.B., 1984. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35, 15-44.
  45. RAVEH, E., S. COHEN, T. RAZ,, D. YAKIR, A. GRAVA, and E.E. GOLDSCHMIDT. 2003. Increased growth of young citrus trees under reduced radiation load in a semi-arid climate. Journal of Experimental Botany 54(381), 365-373.
  46. RAWAT, Y.S., BARGALI, S.S., and BARGALI, K. 2011. Carbon stock and shade tolerance in seedlings of some early and late successional tree species of Central Himalaya (accessed April 8, 2014)
  47. SAIFUDDIN, M., A.M.B. HOSSAIN, and O. NORMANIZA. 2010. Impacts of shading on flower formation and longevity, leaf chlorophyll and growth of Bougainvillea glabra. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 9(1), 20-27.
  48. SAS, 2003. The SAS systems for Windows. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.
  49. SASAKI, S. 2010. Physiological characteristics of tropical rainforest tree species. A basis for the development of silvicultural technology. Ann Bot. 105(7): 1141-1157 (accessed April 8, 2014)
  50. SÖNDAHL, M.R., H.A.M. VAN DER VOSSEN, A.M. PICCIN, and F. ANZUETO 2005. The plant, in: Viani, R. (Ed.), Expresso coffee: the chemistry of quality, second ed. Academic Press Ltd, London
  51. STANHILL, G., and S. COHEN. 2001. Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 107, 255-278.
  52. STEINER, K.G. 1996. Causes of soil degradation and development upwards to sustainable soil management. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim,
  53. STOVER, R.H., 1984. Canopy management in Valery and Grand Nain using leaf area index and photosynthetically active radiation measurements. Fruits 39,89-93.
  54. SUSUKI, A., GAUFICHON, L., CHARDON, F., DECHORGNAT, J., DANIEL-VEDELE, F., and MAXCLAUX-DAUBRESSE, C. 2010. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation sustainable and and remobilization in plants: challenges for productive agriculture. Ann Bot. 105 (7): 1141-1157. (Accessed April 8 2014)
  55. SYVERTSEN, J.P., and M.L. SMITH. 1984. Light acclimation in citrus leaves. I. Changes in physical characteristics, chlorophyll and nitrogen content. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 109,807-812.
  56. TORQUEBIAU, E., and E. AKEAMPONG. 1994. Shedding some light on shade. Agroforestry Today, Oct-Dec 1994: 14-15.
  57. VALLADARES, F., and Ü. NIINEMETS. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant features of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 237-257.
  58. VAN DER VOSSEN H.A.M. 1985. Coffee selection and breeding, in: Clifford, M.N., Wilson, K.C. (Eds.), Coffee botany, biochemistry and production of beans and beverages, London, Croom Helm, pp. 48-96.
  59. VAN DER VOSSEN, H.A.M. 2005. A critical analysis of the agronomic and economic sustainability of organic coffee production. Expl. Agric. 41, 449-473.
  60. WILL, R.E., BARON G.A., BURKES, E.C., SHIVER, B., TESKEY, R.O., 2001. Relationship between intercepted radiation, net photosynthesis, respiration and rate of stem volume growth of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different densities. For. Ecol. Manage. 154, 155-163.
  61. YANG, J., and J. ZHANG. 2006. Tansley review, grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol. 169, 223-236.
  62. ZHAO, D., K.R. REDDY, V.G. KAKANI, J.J. READ, and G.A. CARTER, 2003. Corn (Zea mays L.) growth leaf pigment concentration, photosynthesis and leaf hyperspectral reflectance properties as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Soil 257, 205-217.