Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Natural Calamities by Residents in a Flood-Prone Community: A Case in Leyte, Philippines

Editha  G. Cagasan,; Ma. Victoria Stephane  G. Asio,

Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Natural Calamities by Residents in a Flood-Prone Community: A Case in Leyte, Philippines

Ma. Victoria Stephane G. Asio | Editha G. Cagasan

Abstract:

Residents in disaster-prone areas use information and communication technologies (ICTs) to cope with risks. This study was conducted in a flood-prone barangay of Palo, Leyte to determine the informants' use of ICTs in natural calamities. Following the grounded theory approach, the 23 informants were chosen using snowball sampling and were interviewed using an in-depth interview guide. The theoretical model generated from the data showed that in this flood-prone community, residents are exposed to various information sources that they use in the different phases of the disaster for various reasons. Although informants' reasons for accessing and using ICTs were not primarily related to their use in times of disasters, their good access to these technologies proved useful in times of calamities. ICTs have also proven as crucial means of communication especially in giving residents warnings of an incoming disaster and in surviving and recovering from the disaster. Results suggest the need to enhance ICT access among residents and officials in disaster-prone communities.

References:

ALVIOLA, U.B. and E.G. CAGASAN. 2008. Appropriation of Information and Communications Technologies by farmers and extension workers in Borongan, Eastern Samar. Annals of Tropical Research, 30 (1):93-112.
CHEN, H.R. and J.G. HUANG. 2012. Exploring Learner Attitudes toward Web-based Recommendation Learning Service System for Interdisciplinary Applications. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (2):89-100.
FEDERICOS, M.A.S and R.S. GRAVOSO. (2012. Outcomes from learning online: The case of rice farmers and extension workers in the Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research, 34 (1), 129-146.
FRANKFORT-NACHMIAS, C. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
GLASER, B., A. STRAUSS. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. USA: Aldine Transaction.
GUNAWARDENE, N., AND F. NORONHA. 2007. Introduction. In N. Gunawardene, & F. Noronha, Communicating disasters: An Asia Pacific resource book (pp. 1-4). Bangkok, Thailand: UNDP Regional Centre in Bangkok and TVE Asia Pacific.
Borgatti, Steve. Introduction to grounded theory. 22 September 1996. 13 May 2012 <http://www.analytictech.com/mb870/introtoGT.htm>.
MACK, N., C. WOODSONG, K. MACQUEEN, G. GUEST, and E. NAME. 2005. Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. North Carolina, USA: Family Health International.
MARSHALL, M. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6):522-525.
MARSHALL, C. and G. ROSSMAN. 2011. Designing qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.
NEYLAND, E. 2011. Integrating online learning in NSW secondary schools: Three schools’ perspectives on ICT adoption. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1): 152-173.
STRAUSS, A. L., & CORBIN, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and produres for dveloping grounded theory. USA: Sage publications.
ZSCHAU, J. and A.N. KÜPPERS. 2003. Early warning systems for natural disaster reduction. Berlin: Springer.