HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 27 no. 1 (2005)

Identification of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Community-based Forest Management Program

Jungho Suh | Nick F. Emtage

 

Abstract:

A survey was undertaken during a workshop to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOD of Community-based Forest Management in Leyte Province, the Philippines. A form with open-ended questions, rather than oral discussion sessions traditionally associated with the SWOT analysis, was presented to each member of the group simultaneously. The survey method with a questionnaire was aimed at minimising the time requirement, preventing the data from being biased by a few dominant players, and obtaining relative frequencies. The greatest strength of the forestry program is seen to be the empowcnnent given to rural comnnmities to plant and manage trees on publicly controlled lands. Other strengths include the resources and training provided to support the program, and fostering cooperation between community members. Lack of foreign and local funding to support the program were viewed as the most important weakn ess. The possible withdrawal or depletion of foreign funding was seen as a major potential threat. Respondents are also concerned about whether communities can find markets for their timber and non-timber forest products. Other challenges include the lack of timber processing facilities in Leyte and instability and complexity of government regulations. With regard to opportunities, respondents tended to report what they would like to see done to improve performance of the program, rather than program innovations, probably because as yet little timber harvesting has taken place.



References:

  1. COETZEE, J.H. and M.C. MIDDELMANN. 1997. SWOT analysis of the fynbos industry in South Africa with special reference to research. ACTA Horticulturae. 453: 145-152
  2. DAVID, F.R. 2005. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  3. DILLAN, J. 1988. A SWOT appraisal of the Australian profession of agricultural economics as at 1988. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics. 56(3): 340-346.
  4. EVALUATION DIVISION. 2004. Joint Forest Management: A Case Study on Vana Samrakshana Samithies. Evaluation Series No. 82. Evaluation Division, Kerala State Planning Board, India. http://www.keralaplanningboard.org/. Accessed 17 December 2004.
  5. FAO (FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANISATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS).

1989. Community Forestry: Participatory Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation. Community Forestry Note 2. FAO Forestry Department, Rome.

  1. HARRISON, S.R. 2002. Socio-economic research techniques in tropical forestry. In: Socio-economic Research Methods in Forestry: A Training Manual. (S.R. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn, E.O. Mangaoang and J. Vanclay, eds). Rainforest CRC, Cairns. pp. 5-14.
  2. HARRISON, S.R., EMTAGE, N.F. and J.L. HERBOHN (eds). 2004. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy. Special issue on Community Forestry, Vol. 3, No. 3. Various papers.
  3. HARRISON, S.R. and J.L. HERBOHN. In process. SWOT analysis of forest industry development in north Queensland. Proceedings of the North Queensland Forest Industry Development Workshop. Cairns. 28-29 April.
  4. JIWAN, D. and J.J. KENDAWANG. 2004. SWOT analysis of some agroforestry systems implemented in Sarawak, Malaysia and their future directions. In: Abstracts from the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry Working Together for Sustainable Land Use Systems. Orlando, Florida. 27 June 2 July 2004. p. 60. http://conference.ifas.ufl.edu/wca/. Accessed 7 November 2004.
  5. KURTTILA, M. PESONEN, M., KANGAS, J. and M. KAJANUS. 2000. Utilising the analytic hierachy (AHP) in SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics. 1: 41-52.
  6. MCNUTT, K. 1991. SWOT before you start. Nutrition Today. 26(1): 48-51.
  7. OSWALD, K., RIECHSTEINER D., THEES, O. and R. LEMM. 2004. Reorganisation of wood production for improved performance: A Swiss forest district case study. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy. 3(2): 143-160.
  8. RECOFTC (THE REGIONAL COMMUNITY FORESTRY TRAINING CENTRE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC) 1999. Training Report on Community Forestry Extension. Training and Workshop Report Series No. 1999/12, RECOFTC, Bangkok. www.recoftc.org/documents/Workshop_Reports/9912_exentsion.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2004.
  9. ROBERTS, B. AND R. STIMSON. 1998. Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis: A tool for assessing the competitiveness of regions and formulating strategies for economic development. The Annals of Regional Science. 32: 469-494.
  10. UYCHIAOCO, A.J., ALIÑO, P.M. AND WHITE, A.T. 2002. Marine protected areas in the Philippines: towards harmonizing goals and strategies. Proceedings of IUCN/WCPA-EA-4 Taipei Conference. 18-23 March 2002. pp. 255-260. http://www.cnps.org.tw/park-03/WPC-EA4-002/2%20Session%20B/B03.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2004.