HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 10 no. 3&4 (1988)

Assessment Of Inoculation Techniques And Evaluation Of Fungicides Against Potato Fusarium Dry Rot

Lucia M. Borines | Marina P. Natural

 

Abstract:

Five methods of inoculating Fusarium spp., the causal organisms of potato dry rot, were assessed to find the most suitable technique to evaluate the effectiveness of fungicides against the disease. Depositing 0.2 mL of spore suspension (105spores/mL) of Fusarium spp. into holes in the tubers was the best inoculation method resulting in 75% tuber infection at 12 days after inoculation. Seven fungicides were evaluated for their effectiveness in controlling the disease in stored potato tubers. Benlate at the rate of 3 tbsp/ 19 L water was most effective in minimizing tuber infection and lowering the rate of lesion development. Dithane M-45 and Captan were also effective in controlling the disease and arc good alternatives for Benlate.



References:

  1. COPELAND, R.B. and LOGAN, C. 1975. Control of tuber diseases especially gangrene with benomyl, thiabendazole and other fungicides. Potato Res. 18: 179-188.
  2. HIDE, C. and CAYLEY, G.R. 1980. Test of fungicides for controlling gangrene (Phoma exigua var. foveata) and dry rot (Fusarium solani var. coeruleum and F. sulphureum) on potatoes during storage. Potato Res. 23: 395-403.
  3. HIDE, G.A., HIRST, J.M. AND GRIFFITH, R.L. 1969. Control of potato tuber diseases with systemic fungicides. Proc. 5th Br. Insect. Fungi. Conf. pp. 310-314.
  4. INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER. 1984. Potatoes for the Developing World: A collabora-tive experience. CIP, Lima, Peru. 148 pp.
  5. LEACH, S.S. 1985. Contamination of soil and transmission of seedborne potato dry rot fungi (Fusarium spp.) to progeny tubers. Amer. Potato J. 62: 129-136.
  6. NIELSEN, L.W. 1981. Dry rot. Int Compendium of Potato Diseases. A.J.W. Hooker (ed.). International Potato Center. pp. 60-61.
  7. VANDERZAAG, P., ACASIO, R.F. and SUSANA, B. 1983. Growth, development and nutrient uptake of potatoes in a warm environment of the Philippines. Phil. Agric. 66: 295-303.