Hunting Pattern And Pressure Of Communities Inside Protected Areas In Leyte
Teofanes A. Patindol
Abstract:
The study was conducted to describe the hunting pattern and determine the
factors associated to hunting pressure inside protected areas in Leyte.
The primary motivation to hunt inside protected areas is for both subsistence
and commercial use. Because of low economic opportunities, hunting respondents hunt
despite legal restrictions to augment income. Some non-hunting respondents are
indirectly involved in hunting by participating in the wildlife trade.
The hunting pattern is characterized by preference for big game although
hunting success is low because of the large amount of meat per unit catch. Hunting
efficiency is improved with the use ofhomemade explosives and acquisition of air rifles.
Wild pig is the most sought game and the improvement of hunting technology is geared
toward increased harvest of this animal. The improvement of technology and the
preference for big game made this group of animals highly vulnerable to overhunting.
Equally vulnerable are doves, pigeons and parrots, which are considered secondary
hunting targets for their meat and for pet trade.
The result of the correlation analysis showed that hunting effort is negatively
associated with education, farm and total income of the respondents, and number of
years the respondents availed of livelihood projects.
The overall scenario illustrates a classic interaction wherein pressure is
continuously exerted on a limited resource in a fragile biological system by economically
depressed sector of society. This therefore calls for urgent implementation of integrated
conservation program in protected areas that would address both the biological diversity
resources under constant pressure and the seemingly obligate users exerting the pressure.
References:
- Bailey, J.A., 1984. Principles of Wildlife Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 373p.
- Balakrishnan, M. and D.E. Ndhlovu, 1992. Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machanilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 19(2):135-144.
- De Boer, W.F. and D.S. Baquete, 1998. Natural resource use, crop damage and attitude of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique. Environmental Conservation 25(3):208-218.
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1991. Administartive Order No. 48: Establishment of a National List of Rare (R), Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Vulnearble (V), Indeterminate (I), and Insufficiently Known (K) Species of Philippine Wild Birds, Mammals, and Reptiles. DENR, Quezon City, Philippines.
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1996. Philippine Environmental Statistics. DENR, Quezon City, Philippines. 232p.
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1998. A Sourcebook of Sustainable Development Indicators at the National Level. IEMSD. Quezon City, Philippines. 327p.
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 2000. Leyte Provincial Profile. DENR, Tacloban City, Philippines.
- Fiallo, E.A. and Jacobson, S.K., 1995. Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of Rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22(3):241-249.
- Heinen, J.T., 1993. Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: A socio-economic analysis. Environmental Conservation 20(1):25-35.
- Lyver, P.O'B. and H. Moller, 1999. Modern technology and customary use of wildlife; the harvest of Sooty Shearwaters by Rakiura Maori as a case study. Environmental Conservation 26(4):280-288.
- Mallari, N.A.D., B.R. Tabaranza and M.J. Crosby, 2001. Key Conservation Sites in the Philippines: AHaribon Foundation and Birdlife International Directory of Important Bird Areas. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and Bookmark, Inc. Makati City. 485p.
- Oliver, W.L.R. 1998. Taxonomy and conservation of Philippine wild pigs- an update. Sylvatrop 8(1&2):27-41.
- Rabor, D. 1986. Guide to Philippine Flora and Fauna: Birds and Mammals. University of the Philippines. 2:1-284.
- Robinson, J.G. and R.E. Bodmer, 1999. Towards wildlife management in tropical forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1):1-13.
- Shively, G.E., 1997. Poverty, technology, and wildlife hunting. Environmental Conservation 24(1):357-63.
- Sierra, R., 1999. Traditional resource use systems and tropical deforestation in a multi-ethnic region in North-West Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 26(2):136-145.
- Skonhoft, A. and J.T. Solstad., 1996. Wildlife management, illegal hunting, and conflicts: a bioeconomic analysis. Environment and Development Economics 1(1996):165-181.
ISSN 2704-3541 (Online)
ISSN 0116-0710 (Print)