HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 1 no. 2 (1979)

Behavior And Growth Of Pigs In Group Pens Under Different Feeding Systems

Teodulo O. Milleza | Teodoro A. Abilay

 

Abstract:

Five different feeding systems were tested on growing-finishing pigs. Behavior patterns on lying down, nibbling, drinking, urinating, defecating, walking, and eating were observed. Production traits such as weight gain and feed efficiency were recorded up to 18 weeks. Only two behavioral patterns were significantly affected by the different feeding systems, i.e., lying down and nibbling. Other behavioral patterns were not affected by the treatments. The production traits that were significantly affected by the different feeding systems were the number of days to reach 90 kg average liveweight and backfat thickness. Animals fed twice daily at 60 min each showed significantly shorter period to reach 90 kg average liveweight and have thinner backfat probe compared to those in other treatments.



References:

  1. BRYANT, M. J., and EUBANK, R. 1972. Effects of stocking and group size upon antagonistic behavior in groups of growing pigs. British Vet. J. 128:64.
  2. CASTEEL, M., and BEKHAERT, H. 1974. Individual versus group housing for fattening pigs. An. Breeding Abstr. 43(2): 48.
  3. COLE, D. J., DUCKWORTH, J. E., HOLMES, W., and CUTHNERTSON, S. 1968. Factors affecting voluntary intake in pigs. The effect of period of restriction, nutrient density of the diet and sex on intake, performance and carcass characteristics. An. Prod. 10: 345.
  4. DAMMERT, S. 1974. The influence of piglet birth weight on losses and growth rate during rearing and fattening. An. Breeding Abstr. 43: 3.
  5. ELLIOT, J. I., and DOIGE, C. E. 1973. Effect of type of confinement on performance and on the occurrence of locomotory disturbances in market pigs. An Breeding Abstr. 42 (1): 23.
  6. HEITMAN, H. Jr., HAHN, L., BOND, T. E., and KELLY, C. F. 1963. Continuous versus periodic observations in behavior studies with swine raised in confinement. An. Behavior 10: 165.
  7. KNEALE, W. A. 1972. A comparison of commercial diet and dry feeding system for fattening bacon pigs. Experimental Husbandry (London) No. 21.
  8. MORRISON, R. S., HEITMAN, H., and GIVENS, R. L. 1975. Effect of diurnal air temperature cycle on growth and feed conversion on pigs. An Prod. 20: 267.
  9. MOYER, A. W., WEEDLING, L., and KOCH, E. I. 1975. Pig production needs efficient management. World Farming 17 (11): 8.
  10. POND, G. W., and MANER, J. H. 1974. Swine production in temperature and tropical environments. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 22 p.
  11. SHERRITT, C. W., GRAVES, H. B., GOBBLES, J. L., and HASLETT, V. E. 1974. Effects of mixing pigs during the growing-finishing period. J. An. Sci. 39 (5): 34.
  12. SUPNET, M. G. 1975. Methods of feeding pigs compared. Modern Agric. Ind. 3 (1): 14.