HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 25 no. 1 (2003)

Landholder Types in Leyte, the Philippines: A Review of Literature and Proposals for Methods to Extend Understanding

Nicholas F Emtage

 

Abstract:

Landholder typologies are potentially useful to assist in the design and administration of tree planting support programs. This paper reports a review of relevant literature on the nature of landholder types in regard to tree planting and upland farming in the Philippines, and some preliminary impressions of landholder types in several communities in Leyte on the basis of information obtained from visits to these communities in 2001 . The potential research methodology to examine landholder attitudes and explore for the presence of distinct groups with respect to these attitudes in Leyte is examined.



References:

  1. BALBARINO, E.A. 2001. Participatory Rural Appraisal in Land-use Planning for Forestry. Paper presented to the ACIAR/VISCA Smallholder Forestry Planning Workshop, Baybay, Leyte, July 2001.
  2. BARR, N. 1996. Conventional and low-input pasture improvement a review of recent market research. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 39: 559-567.
  3. BELSKY, J.M. 1984. Stratification Among Hillside Farmers and Some Implications for Agroforestry Programs: A Case Study in Leyte, Philippines. Master of Science thesis. Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Cornell University. 177pp.
  4. CHAMALA, S. 1987. Strategies to overcome communication deficiencies in achieving sustainable agriculture. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science. 55(3): 164-169.
  5. CONKLIN, H.C. 1957. A Report on the Integral System of Shifting Cultivation in the Philippines. FAO of the United Nations, Rome. 209pp.
  6. EMTAGE, N.F. 1995. Landholders’ Perceptions of Planting and Managing Trees. B. App.Sci. Hons. Thesis. Southern Cross University, Lismore.
  7. EMTAGE, N.F., HARRISON, S.R. and J.L. HERBOHN. 2001. Landholder attitudes to and participation in farm forestry activities in sub-tropical and tropical eastern Australia. Chapter 15. In: Sustainable Farm Forestry in the Tropics: Social and Economic Analysis and Policy (S.R. Harrison and J.L. Herbohn, eds.). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  8. ESSC. 1999. The Decline of Philippine Forests. ESSC, Ateneo de Manila Campus, Katipunan, Quezon City.
  9. FULTON, A. and D. RACE. 2001. Farm forestry in Australia: Why do landholders get involved? In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Developing Policies to Encourage Small-Scale Forestry. IUFRO Research Group 3.08 Small-Scale Forestry, Kuranda, January 2000.
  10. GONZAL, D.G. 1988. Community Forestry: A Need to Train Upland Development Workers in the Philippines. RECOFTC Paper 11, Bangkok. Regional Community Forestry Training Centre, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok. 18pp.
  11. HOWDEN, P., VANCLAY, F., LEMERIE, D. and J. KENT. 1998. Working with the grain: Farming styles amongst Australian broadacre croppers. Rural Sociology. 8(2): 109-127.
  12. KAINE, G.W. and J.W. LEE. 1994. Patterns in Innovation: An Analysis of the Adoption of Practices in the Cattle Breeding Industry. The Rural Development Centre, University of New England, Armidale. 60pp.
  13. KUMMER, D. and C. HO SHAM. 1994. The causes of tropical deforestation: A quantitative analysis and case study from the Philippines. In: The Causes of Tropical Deforestation: The Economic and Statistical Analysis of Factors Giving Rise to the Loss of Tropical Forests (K. Brown and D.W. Pearce, eds.).UCL Press, London.
  14. JOCANO, F.L. 1998. Filipino Indigenous Ethnic Communities: Patterns, Variations and Typologies. PUNLAD Research House Inc., Manila. pp. 223.
  15. ΟΟΙ, J.B. 1987. Depletion of Forestry Resources in the Philippines. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Singapore, Singapore.
  16. RACE, D. 1999. Regional farm forestry industries: Potential dimensions and possible outcomes. Australian Forestry. 62(2): 182-192.
  17. RAINTREE, J.B. 1991. Socioeconomic Attributes of Trees and Tree Planting Practices. FAO. Rome.
  18. ROCHELEAU, D.E. 1996. The user perspective and the agroforestry research and action agenda. In: Agroforestry: Realities, Possibilities and Potentials (H.L. Goltz, ed.). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
  19. SPECHT, A. and N.F. EMTAGE. 1998. Landholders’ Perceptions of Farm Forestry in the Northern Rivers Region of New South Wales. Report to the Northern Rivers Regional Plantation Committee, Ballina.
  20. VANCLAY, F. and G. LAWRENCE. 1995. The Environmental Imperative: Eco-social Concerns for Australian Agriculture. Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton.
  21. VANCLAY, F., MESITI L., and P. HOWDEN. 1998. Styles of farming and farming sub-cultures: Appropriate concepts for Australian rural sociology? Rural Society. 8(2): 85-108.
  22. VAN DEN BAN, A.W. and H.S. HAWKINS. 1996. Agricultural Extension. Blackwell Science, London. 294 pp.