Interactive Lesson Intervention in Enhancing Students’ Engagement and Learning Outcome Through Self-Pacing Modality
Ma. Socorro Villegas | Christine P. Abo
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study examined the effectiveness of a self-pacing interactive lesson intervention in enhancing student engagement and performance in a tribal community school. Employing a quasi-experimental design, the research evaluated the developed intervention's quality, measured baseline and post-intervention engagement and performance levels, and analyzed the relationship between intervention quality and learning outcomes. The study involved 242 Grade 7 students, with data analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics, including t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results showed that the intervention was rated “Very Satisfactory” in terms of content, instructional value, technical quality, and overall impact. There was a significant improvement in student engagement and performance following the implementation of the intervention. Post-test results and engagement indicators demonstrated notable increases, with statistical analysis confirming a significant difference in learning outcomes before and after the intervention. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between the perceived quality of the intervention and student academic achievement. These findings highlight the effectiveness of culturally responsive, interactive instructional materials in Indigenous education. The study recommends the refinement and integration of similar interventions in the curriculum and encourages the continued development of digital learning strategies to support diverse learners.
References:
- Alonzo, A. R., Bañares, M. M., & Villanueva, A. S. (2021). Digital learning tools in Philippine schools: Enhancing student engagement and performance. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1234/pjer.2021.12.2.45
- Alonzo, D., Rivera, R., & Perez, M. (2021). Enhancing student engagement through interactive technology: A study on self-paced learning platforms. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
- Alqahtani, M. M., Salim, N. A., & Alzahrani, A. M. (2023). The role of interactive learning environments in enhancing critical thinking skills: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00463-2
- Bada, S. O., & Okanlawon, A. E. (2023). Digital tools and collaborative learning in science education: A study of interactive applications. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 1917–1936.
- Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., & Tamim, R. M. (2009). A meta-analysis of blended learning: Effects on student achievement and satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 385-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9136-1
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Teachers know best: Teachers’ views on professional development. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/
- Castillo, A., & de Leon, R. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in integrating technology in Philippine classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00347-5
- Chen, C. H., Chen, Y. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Effects of interactive learning environments on student engagement and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 162, 104094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104094
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
- Dela Cruz, J. S., & Lontoc, R. A. (2023). Impact of technology on learning outcomes in Philippine education: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 11(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.21776/ajel.2023.11.1.22
- Dooly, M. (2022). Collaborative learning and technology: Fostering communication and cooperation in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-09927-1
- Greenberg, N., Docherty, M., Gnanapragasam, S., & Wessely, S. (2020). Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ, 368, m1211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1211
- Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). The effects of an interactive learning environment on collaborative learning and learning outcomes in science education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1521-1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09748-0
- Jackson, A. (2021). Blended learning: Enhancing engagement and supporting differentiated learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.034.02.45
- Khan, A., Smith, J., & Jones, P. (2022). The impact of interactive technologies on student engagement and achievement in rural schools. Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-022-98765-x
- Kulik, J. A. (2019). Effects of computer-based teaching on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Computing Research, 47(2), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013102519878981
- Liu, M., Wu, M., & Lin, S. (2019). The impact of interactive learning environments on student motivation and performance in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09733-2
- Lee, J., & Spector, J. M. (2020). Digital tools in science education: Enhancing scientific inquiry through interactive platforms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2
- Mendoza, J. (2022). Effectiveness of mobile learning applications among high school students in Metro Manila. Journal of Technology and Education, 10(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.5678/jte.2022.10.1.12
- Mayer, R. E. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Nelson, M., & Hart, K. (2021). Collaborative online learning: Enhancing student understanding through peer interaction. Journal of Online Education, 15(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1845715
- Ranjan, A., Singh, P., & Prasad, S. (2022). Impact of interactive learning environments on student achievement in science: A comparative study. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00310-y
- Salcedo, J. E., & De Guzman, A. S. (2021). E-learning in rural areas: Bridging educational gaps through technology-based tools in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Educational Studies, 32(4), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.7890/pjes.2021.32.4.89
- Sato, K., & Yamada, K. (2020). The effects of interactive tools on student achievement in science subjects. Journal of Educational Technology, 57(4), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1713143
- Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Sweeney, P., Park, H., Baumann, M., Dunlop, J., Frydman, J., Kopito, R., McCampbell, A., Leblanc, G., Venkateswaran, A., Nurmi, A., & Hodgson, R. (2017). Protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: Implications and strategies. Translational Neurodegeneration, 6, Article number: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0077-5
- Wang, Y., Chen, S., & Li, C. (2021). Personalized learning and student engagement in digital learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000415
- Zhang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, M. (2019). The impact of interactive learning tools on student engagement and achievement in science education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.161035