HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 43 no. 1 (2025)

Application of Solo Taxonomy in Teaching English

Regie-Ann Clavacio | Merlyn Legaspi-Estoque

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study assessed the effectiveness of the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) Taxonomy in improving the reading comprehension proficiency of Grade 7 students. The research focused on the integration of SOLO-based questioning strategies and their impact on critical thinking and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in English reading tasks aligned with the MATATAG curriculum. Using a quasi-experimental design, two existing sections from a public secondary school were selected—the experimental group that the received SOLO-integrated instruction, while the control group received conventional reading instruction. A total of 64 students participated in the study. Pre-tests and post-tests were administered, with researcher-made instruments consisting of PISA-based questions and researcher-made questions aligned to SOLO levels. Results revealed a notable increase in proficiency among the experimental group from "Fair" to "Very Satisfactory," with significant gains particularly at higher SOLO levels (relational and extended abstract). In contrast, the control group remained at the "Satisfactory" level. Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test confirmed significant differences in performance before and after the intervention. The findings underscored the effectiveness of the SOLO framework in promoting deeper learning, metacognition, and structured cognitive progression. The study recommends integrating the SOLO Taxonomy in instructional planning, providing professional development for teachers, and aligning curriculum resources to support critical reading development. Further research is suggested to explore SOLO’s application in other subject areas and grade levels.



References:

  1. Abdullah-Masran, M. (2021). Students’ self-assessment in the SOLO taxonomy learning environment. International Journal of Learning and Development. DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10109 
  2. Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Redesigning a mixed-method research study during a pandemic: A case study from Nigeria and Australia. Issues in Educational Research, 33(1), 1–18. Retrieved from: https://www.iier.org.au/iier33/adeniji.pdf
  3. Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
  4. Bloom, B. S. (1994). Bloom’s taxonomy in Rehage, Kenneth J.; Anderson, Lorin W.; Sosniak, Lauren A., eds. “Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective”. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
  5. Caridade, C., & Pereira, V. (2024). The use of SOLO taxonomy in assessing complex learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research. The Barcelona Conference on Education 2024: Official Conference Proceedings. IAFOR. Retrieved from: https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/bce2024/BCE2024_86124.pdf
  6. Caridade, C. (2024). SOLO in multilingual English classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education.
  7. Chen, L. (2025). Gamifying SOLO levels for adolescent learners. Educational Technology & Society.
  8. Dumaraos, J. (2022). Level of complexity in utilizing SOLO taxonomy among Grade VI pupils of Callejon Elementary School.
  9. Ghunaimat, M., et al. (2024). SOLO taxonomy in coordinate geometry: Implications for cross-disciplinary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i3.592
  10. Ghunaimat, M. (2025). SOLO and translanguaging strategies. Multilingual Education Review.
  11. Idek, M. S. (2020). Fostering ESL critical reading skills through SOLO taxonomy. Universiti Teknologi MARA.
  12. Hook, P. (2019). About SOLO Taxonomy [Review of About SOLO Taxonomy]. https://leadinglearnerdotme.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/about-solotaxonomy-by-pam-hook-pdf.pdf Journal of English for Academic Purposes.
  13. Journal of Education and Educational Research. (2024). SOLO-based discourse teaching in primary English, 6(3), 205–211.
  14. Main, P. (2021, May 24). A Teacher’s Guide To SOLO Taxonomy [Review of A Teacher’s Guide To SOLO Taxonomy].
  15. Mazla, et al. (2023). Exploring the integration of bite-sized learning: A scoping review of research in education and related disciplines. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep468.
  16. Pereira, V. (2024). SOLO taxonomy and peer-assessment dynamics. Assessment in Education.
  17. Ladias, A.,  Karvounidis, T., &  Ladias, D.  (2022).  Forms of communications in scratch and the SOLO   taxonomy. Advances   in   Mobile   Learning   Educational   Research, 2(1), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.007
  18. Learning, University of Windsor. Puccio, G. J., Wheeler, R. & Cassandro, V. J. (2014).Rai, A. (2023). Metacognitive strategies in SOLO-driven classrooms. Language Teaching Research.
  19. Sari, R. N., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2020). Higher and lower-order thinking skills in English reading tasks: An analysis of “Symphony 1” course book. Journal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(2), 189–200.
  20. Shavers, E. (2022). Context clues and SOLO taxonomy in reading. Journal of Literacy Studies.
  21. Shao, Y., et al. (2024). A theoretical study on college English reading teaching based on SOLO categorization theory. Advances in Neural Networks.
  22. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2023). Using SOLO taxonomy to enhance students’ assessment literacy in Chinese language reading comprehension.
  23. Singapore MOE. (2024). SOLO and AI-driven feedback systems. EdTech Asia Conference Proceedings.
  24. Suryani, N., & Syahbani, M. (2023). Gamification and SOLO taxonomy: A strategy to promote active engagement and discipline in English language learning. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8544