Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 42 no. 5 (2025)

Implementation of the Open High School System of St. Paul University Surigao: Looking Through the Lens of Students and Stakeholders

Camille Entendez | Kristopher Ngilangil

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of students and stakeholders involved in the Open High School System (OHSS) using Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological approach. Through in-depth interviews guided by grand tour questions, the study sought to understand the realities, challenges, and support systems surrounding the OHSS implementation. Participants included students, teachers, and parents directly engaged in the program. The findings revealed several recurring themes: financial problems affecting students’ access to learning resources and; irregular teacher attendance, which hampered consistent delivery of instruction; student attendance and motivation issues due to competing responsibilities at home and lack of direct supervision; and the critical role of familial support in sustaining student participation and academic performance. These shared experiences provide insight into the complexities of implementing alternative education programs in diverse contexts. The study emphasizes the need for strengthened institutional support, targeted interventions, and consistent stakeholder engagement to address the systemic challenges identified. Ultimately, the research aimed to contribute to the improvement of the OHSS by informing policy and program enhancements grounded in lived realities.



References:

  1. Andika, D. (2022). Teacher role as professional educator in school environment. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 1(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.58291/ijsecs.v1i1.25
  2. Ayubu, I. N. (2022). Initial teachers preparation in Tanzania: Analysis of enrollment policies in teacher education: A review. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2022/V28i330679
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  4. Bongco, R. T., & David, A. P. (2020). Filipino teachers’ experiences as curriculum policy implementers in the evolving K to 12 landscape. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 19–34.
  5. Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Enhancing academic performance and social and emotional competence with the RULER feeling words curriculum. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.002
  6. Carolan, B. V., & Gill, K. E. (2021). How school climate impacts student well-being and academic achievement. Journal of School Health, 91(3), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12990
  7. Cena, D. L., & Corpuz, G. G. (2024). Implementation of Open High School Program and school performance in the Division of Bukidnon: Basis for program implementation plan. Asian Journal of Advanced Health Science, 3(2), Article 2861. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i2.2861
  8. Cruz, S., & Vargas, D. (2021). Open high school program (OHSP): Efficacy in its implementation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3800933
  9. Cuadrazal, J. E., Ensomo, W., & Estampa, A. (2016). Exploring the experiences of journalists in Surigao City on media persecutions [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. St. Paul University – Surigao.
  10. de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2010). Attitudes of parents towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856251003658694
  11. De Guzman, M. T., & Uy, B. J. (2018). Teaching in the margins: Challenges and coping mechanisms of teachers in the Open High School Program in rural Philippines. Journal of Alternative Education Research, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1482090
  12. Department of Education (DepEd). (2006). Guidelines on the pilot implementation of the Open High School Program (OHSP) (DepEd Order No. 46). Department of Education.
  13. Department of Education. (2010). DepEd Order No. 74, s. 2010: Guidelines on the implementation of the Open High School Program (OHSP). https://www.deped.gov.ph
  14. Department of Education. (2020). Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/DepEd_LCP_July3b.pdf
  15. Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2023: Guidelines on the Implementation of Flexible Learning Options. https://www.deped.gov.ph
  16. Department of Education CALABARZON. (2021). LAC session reports on alternative delivery modes and Open High School practices [Unpublished regional memorandum]. Department of Education – Batangas City Division.
  17. Department of Education Region VIII. (2022). Consolidated LAC session insights on student engagement under OHSP [Unpublished report]. Department of Education – Region VIII Division of Leyte.
  18. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
  19. EDCOM II. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival. Second Congressional Commission on Education. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2025/01/EDCOM-2-Year-2-Report-Fixing-the-Foundations-2025.pdf
  20. Gupta, D. (2023). The role of facilitator, types, and responsibility. Whatfix. https://whatfix.com/blog/training-facilitators/
  21. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Classroom environments and developmental processes: Conceptualization and measurement. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 25–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874844.ch3
  22. IBON Foundation. (2023, September 5). The neglect of PH education: Where do we go from here? https://www.ibon.org/the-neglect-of-ph-education-where-do-we-go-from-here/
  23. Jones, S. M., & Kahn, J. (2017, September 13). The evidence base for how we learn: Supporting students’ social, emotional, and academic development. The Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SEAD-Research-Brief-9.12_updated-web.pdf
  24. Lagrio, R. G., Saclet, S. C., Gerasmia, M. C., & Segundo, T. P. (2022). Lived experiences of parents and teachers in module distribution and retrieval: The untold story.
  25. Marttinen, E., Moeller, J., Ranta, M., Sortheix, F., Tuominen, H., Upadyaya, K., et al. (2017). Which combinations of personal goals do adolescents and young adults pursue? A co-occurrence network analysis during an eight years follow-up [Manuscript in preparation].
  26. Mitra, D. L. (2018). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. SUNY Press.
  27. Noack, P., Kracke, B., Gniewosz, B., & Dietrich, J. (2010). Parental and school effects on students’ occupational exploration: A longitudinal and multilevel analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.
  28. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  29. Philippine Business for Education (PBEd). (2023). Teaching realities in the new normal: A national situationer.
  30. Rappler. (2024). ‘Out of pocket’: Teachers still funding DepEd school activities. https://www.rappler.com
  31. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  32. Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students‘ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
  33. SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2015). Evaluation of the open high school programs in the Philippines. http://www.seameo-innotech.org
  34. She, J., Chan, K. K. H., Wang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, E. (2025). Effect of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from both text‑ and video‑based pedagogical content knowledge tests. Educational Researcher.
  35. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
  36. Timula, J. M. (2022). Open high school program during pandemic: An assessment: Basis for program enhancement. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(6), 1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.06.23
  37. Tuason, M. T. G. (2008). Those who were born poor: A qualitative study of Philippine poverty. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.158
  38. UNESCO. (2021). Philippines: Education and literacy. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/en/country/ph
  39. Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic