Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Human-Centric Extension and Women’s Participation: A Longitudinal Study on Community Empowerment and Social Impact

Ramil S. Bulilan | Riza B. Salipong | Dearyl Mae C. Batan | Ariel Christian C. Viodor | Flora Mae A. Bantilan

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

The success of any project relies on rigorous monitoring, evaluation, and timely assessment aligned with established goals. To this end, a team of researchers and extensionists assessed an extension project implemented by the State University’s research and extension unit in 2014. The study aimed to evaluate its impact on the social fabric of its beneficiaries, involving twenty-nine participants. A mixedmethods approach was employed, utilizing questionnaires, focus group discussions, SWOT analysis, and key informant interviews. Findings from the SWOT analysis aligned with regular monitoring and evaluation reports, offering critical lessons. However, only a minority of association members actively contributed, while others displayed indifference and engaged in gossip, which caused internal conflicts. Despite these challenges, beneficiaries expressed satisfaction with the program's outputs, including skills training, health education, computer literacy, advocacy programs, and livelihood initiatives. Both economic and social impacts were rated as satisfactory, demonstrating the project’s contribution to improving their social well-being. At its very least, the study highlights the need for renewed strategies to foster active participation and resolve conflicts within associations. Sustaining the project’s positive outcomes requires renewing the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) before its expiration, ensuring continued support for the beneficiaries, and addressing the challenges identified.



References:

  1. Abbadia, J. (2023). What is triangulation in research: The path to reliable findings. https://mindthegraph.com/blog/what-is-triangulation-in-research/ 
  2. Ammakis, J. S. (2013). Evaluation of extension programs and services of the Kalinga-Apayao State College, Tabuk City, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 12. https://garph.co.uk/IJARMSS/Dec2013/22.pdf 
  3. Basics of Impact Assessments (2022). Impact Assessment of Canada. Government of Canada. https://tinyurl.com/42sh8wwh 
  4. Bhandari, P. (2022). Triangulation in research: Guide, types, examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/triangulation/ 
  5. Birrell, N. D. & Ould, M. A. (2010). Chapter 4 - Project Inception. Cambridge University Press. https://tinyurl.com/yvbjd277 
  6. Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., Feeney, H., & Fehler-Cabral, G. (2020). Assessing triangulation across methodologies, methods, and stakeholder groups: The joys, woes, and politics of interpreting convergent and divergent data. American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 41(1) 125-144. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1098214018804195 
  7. CHED Memorandum Order 52, series of 2016. From https://ched.gov.ph/2016-ched-memorandum-orders/ 
  8. Codamon-Dugyon, E. M. (2016). Impact of community extension programs on the residents of selected adopted barangays of Ifugao State University, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Research. https://tinyurl.com/33nanjbt 
  9. Christens, B. D., & Lin, C. (2021). Power in numbers: The role of social power and collective action in community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 67(1-2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12500 
  10. Frazer, S. (2021). How inception phases strengthen development programming. https://www.rti.org/insights/inception-phase 
  11. Gadlage & Manos, (2020). Implementation, phases, and project management. SpringerLink (Chapter 4). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-46812-5_5 
  12. Guy-Evans, O. (2022, June 06. Social Impact Theory. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/social-impact-theory.html 
  13. Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, S. (2008). Shared cognition in small groups. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes; John Wiley & Sons, p.239.
  14. Larese-Casanova, M. (2017). Measuring program impacts: Assessment of participant knowledge gain. Utah State University Extension Publication Utah Master Naturalist/2017-02pr. https://tinyurl.com/2s3zyu6w 
  15. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist. 36 (4): 343–356. 
  16. Latané, B. (1996). Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication. Journal of Communication, Volume 46, Issue 4, pages 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01501.x 
  17. Llenares, I. I. & Deocaris, C. C. (2018). Measuring the impact of a community extension program in the Philippines. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, Vol. 15 No. 1, 35-55 https://tinyurl.com/25jfmdx9 
  18. Luciano, R. G. & Olipas, C. N. O (2022). Impact assessment on the technology-based extension projects: A basis for designing sustainable extension activities. Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal. https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/1672 
  19. Malahay, R. S. (April 2019). Assessment of capability building community extension program in Negros Oriental, Philippines. International Journal of English and Education ISSN: 2278-4012, Volume, Issue. https://tinyurl.com/928v5jy6 
  20. Milat, A. J., Bauman, A. E., & Redman, S. (2015). A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13, 18. https://tinyurl.com/bddcya2r 
  21. Nimer, B. B. & Pacoy, E. P. (2020). Evaluating an extension program through the lens of the human security approaches. https://tinyurl.com/5n7v7f5j 
  22. Sibal, C. A. & Elizaga, J. B. (2019). Impact assessment of the extension program of the College of Public Administration, Cagayan State University, Carig Campus. International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 8, no. 6. ISSN: 2278–6236. https://garph.co.uk/IJARMSS/June2019/G-2682.pdf 
  23. Smith, J., Wyatt, R., & Love, P.E.D. (2008). Key decision-making attributes for project inception. Facilities, 26(7/8),289–309. https://tinyurl.com/2f9e42zj 
  24. Tallapaka, M. (2022). Project management methodologies- linear and iterative. https://tinyurl.com/mr3e8nhu 
  25. Vogel, I. (2022). Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. UK Department for International Development. https://tinyurl.com/mwzc6by5 
  26. Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65–92). Aspen Institute. 
  27. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic