Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Examining Digital Competence among Filipino Public School Teachers: Generational Gaps, Institutional Support and ICT Perceptions

Amaranth M. Wong | Feluz Irish M. Sy | Jonathan P. Wong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines the digital competence of public elementary school teachers in the Romblon District, Philippines, with a focus on generational differences, support for capacity building, and attitudes toward technology use in education. Addressing the growing need for teacher readiness in digital classrooms, the study used a descriptive-correlational research design with 296 participants. Teachers were grouped as digital natives (born after 1980) and digital immigrants (born before 1980). Findings showed that digital natives demonstrated higher levels of digital competence compared to digital immigrants. Teachers who reported greater access to training, technology resources, and peer collaboration also had stronger digital skills. Additionally, a positive attitude toward ICT integration was linked to higher competence. These results suggest that institutional support and teacher mindset play essential roles in developing digital proficiency. The study recommends targeted training programs based on generational needs, equal access to digital resources, and stronger peer learning communities. These strategies can help bridge gaps in digital competence and enhance the overall integration of technology in teaching. The findings contribute to ongoing efforts to improve teacher preparedness for digital education in both local and global contexts



References:

  1. Acosta, I. C., & Acosta, A. S. (2021). Barriers to digital education in geographically isolated Philippine schools. Journal of Asian Educational Development, 12(3), 45–60.
  2. Almerino, P. M., Etcuban, J. O., & Dela Cruz, R. (2020). Challenges of multigrade teaching in Philippine public schools. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 345–360.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
  5. Bernardo, J. R., Mendoza, A. S., & Ocampo, D. (2022). Infrastructure limitations and ICT adoption in Philippine rural schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(1), 89–102.
  6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Examining preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge as self-efficacy. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 77–88.
  7. David, C. C., Albert, J. R., & Vizmanos, J. F. (2021). Diskarte in Philippine education: Teachers’ adaptive strategies in low-resource settings. Philippine Journal of Education, 100(2), 34–50.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  10. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
  11. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2019). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International Report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
  12. Hämäläinen, R., Nissinen, K., Mannonen, J., Lämsä, J., Leino, K., & Taajamo, M. (2021). Understanding teaching professionals’ digital competence: What do PIAAC and TALIS reveal about technology-related skills, attitudes, and knowledge? Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106672
  13. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
  14. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
  15. Hernández, L. J., & Florencio, E. S. (2022). Adaptive strategies for digital learning in Philippine island schools. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 5(1), 112–128.
  16. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2018). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1415865
  17. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
  18. Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
  19. Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. (2023). Diskarte and innovation: Filipino teachers’ coping mechanisms in digital education. Philippine Social Science Review, 75(1), 1–20.
  20. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  21. Rodriguez, M. V., & Macayan, J. V. (2020). Technology integration in Philippine multigrade classrooms: Challenges and adaptations. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 22(1), 78–95.
  22. Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2019). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.020
  23. Soriano, G. P., Mendoza, L. C., & Cruz, R. A. (2021). Digital divide in Philippine education: A rural-urban analysis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 145–160.
  24. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  25. Tourón, J., Martín, D., Navarro, E., Pradas, S., & Íñigo, V. (2018). Validación de constructo de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital docente de los profesores (CDD). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(269), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02
  26. Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
  27. Unwin, T., Kleine, D., & Hollow, D. (2020). Technologies for education in low-resource settings. EdTech Hub.
  28. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic