Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Late, Not Lazy: A Qualitative Exploration of Tardiness and Workplace Accountability among Employees in a State University

Amy Y. Refuncion | Jose Marlon J. Refuncion Jr. | Elmer A. Irene

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Habitual tardiness among government employees remains a persistent challenge despite existing policies such as the Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (RRACCS). While most studies focus on sanctions and quantitative trends, little is known about how sanctioned employees perceive and experience habitual lateness, particularly in Philippine state universities. This study used a descriptive phenomenological design guided by Giorgi’s method to explore the lived experiences of ten permanent employees who had been formally sanctioned for tardiness within the past 6–12 months. In-depth interviews were analyzed into meaning units, psychological insights, and essential themes. Four themes emerged: (1) balancing family demands and professional obligations; (2) systemic and environmental factors influencing tardiness; (3) punctuality does not reflect work performance; and (4) emotional impact and personal reflections on tardiness. Findings revealed that caregiving responsibilities, commuting challenges, and inconsistent policy enforcement shape tardiness. Employees often felt guilt and frustration, but also showed motivation for improvement after sanctions. The study concludes that habitual tardiness is not merely disciplinary but a multifaceted issue requiring human-centered interventions. The proposed TIME CARE framework—Tardiness Intervention through Management, Empathy, and Consistent Accountability with Responsive Engagement—offers a holistic approach. This study contributes to policy reform, wellnessdriven accountability, and strategies that balance empathy, structure, and performance.



References:

  1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  2. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Business News Daily. (2024). Late for work? You are not alone. https://tinyurl.com/3udyxtpz
  4. Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych
  5. Casper, W. J., Hyde, S. A., Smith, S. G., Amirkamali, F., & Wayne, J. H. (2024). How effective are work-life balance policies? The importance of inclusion. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych
  6. Civil Service Commission. (2017). Revised rules on administrative cases in the civil service (RRACCS). CSC Resolution No. 1701077. https://tinyurl.com/mrbxrx3s
  7. Comaling, M. A. (2025). Effectiveness of incentive-based and disciplinary interventions in reducing employee tardiness. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 14(3), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140300076
  8. Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/munyunz6
  10. Gabriel, A. S., Arena Jr, D. F., Calderwood, C., Campbell, J. T., Chawla, N., Corwin, E. S., & Zipay, K. P. (2022). Building thriving workforces from the top down: A call and research agenda for organizations to proactively support employee well-being. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 205–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-730120220000040007
  11. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press. https://catalog.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/5443340
  12. Han, Y. (2019). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: Performance-accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6), 927–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679237
  13. Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way (D. J. Lu, Trans.). Prentice-Hall.
  14. Kasperska, A., Matysiak, A., & Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2024). Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 19(5), e0303307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303307
  15. Kulal, A., N, A., & Dinesh, S. (2025). Punctuality at work and job performance: Do non-punctual employees outperform punctual ones? International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-08-2024-0140
  16. Mercara, J. L. D. (2020). Prediction of employees’ lateness determinants using machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(1), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/111912020
  17. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6989-3_3
  20. Refuncion, J. M., & Valles, A. (2025). Demographic and workplace factors affecting absenteeism and tardiness in a state university in Samar, Philippines. Journal of Academic Research, 9(1), 12-22. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yc2b5ht5
  21. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
  22. The Guardian. (2024). Time optimists: Why Zoomers are much less punctual than Boomers. https://tinyurl.com/mw4za22b
  23. Warne, M., Svensson, Å., Tirén, L., & Wall, E. (2020). On time: A qualitative study of Swedish students’, parents’, and teachers’ views on school attendance, with a focus on tardiness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041430
  24. Williams, J. A., Lewis, C., Starker Glass, T., Butler, B. R., & Hoon Lim, J. (2020). The discipline gatekeeper: Assistant principals’ experiences with managing school discipline in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 58(8), 1543–1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920908913
  25. Zippia. (2024). Late for work statistics. https://www.zippia.com/advice/late-for-work-statistics

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic