Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Learning Gaps in Science Education through AI: Scale Development among Junior High School Students in a Laboratory High School

Mary-an A. Mangubat | Kenth R. Manait | Lovely Joy M. Marianito | Steve I. Embang

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education offers promising opportunities to address persistent learning gaps in science, particularly in under-resourced secondary schools; however, few validated instruments assess the impact of AI tools on students' learning challenges. This study aimed to develop and validate the Artificial Intelligence Learning Gap (AILG) Scale, which measures disparities in science education related to AI use by capturing students’ experiences and identifying key dimensions of learning gaps. Employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, the research began with interviews and focus groups involving 20 junior high school students, alongside a literature review that informed the creation of a 4-point Likert scale. The instrument was then administered to 120 students for validation through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis. The final AILG Scale comprises 29 items spanning four dimensions: Engagement with AI Tools, Cognitive Challenges, Motivation and Personalization, and Teaching Practices. These dimensions collectively explain 41.36% of the variance, with Cronbach’s Alpha values ranging from 0.670 to 0.843, indicating acceptable to high reliability. This scale offers a practical, evidence-based tool for diagnosing science learning gaps in AIenhanced classrooms, supporting targeted interventions, teacher training, and further research, particularly in contexts where educational technology is becoming increasingly integral.



References:

  1. Adames, H. Y., Franco, V., Castellanos, J., Chávez-Dueñas, N. Y., & White, J. L. (2023). Riding the academic freedom train. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446873
  2. Adeoye‐Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358-1367.
  3. Agoritsa, C., et al. (2021). AI tools in science education: Perceptions across grade levels. Journal of Educational Technology Innovations, 9(2), 45–60. 
  4. Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., M. Ameen, B. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
  5. Akhmadieva, R. S., Udina, N. N., Kosheleva, Y. P., Zhdanov, S. P., Timofeeva, M. O., & Budkevich, R. L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Science education: A bibliometric review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4).
  6. Alabi, M. (2024). Visual learning: The power of visual aids and multimedia. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 123-135.
  7. Alejo, A., Jenkins, R., & Yao, H. (2023). Learning losses during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Understanding and addressing increased learning disparities. Future in Educational Research, 2(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.21
  8. Altinay, Z. (2024). Factors influencing AI learning motivation and personalization among pre-service teachers in higher education. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 14(2), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2024/v14/i2/2714
  9. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in enhancing science learning experiences: Exploring possibilities and concerns. (2024). NIU Journal of Educational Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2000
  10. Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (2018). The challenge and value of focus groups in health research. In Focus group research: A practical guide (pp. 1–17). Sage Publications.
  11. Bartell, D. S., & Vespia, K. M. (2023). Teaching and learning in the “Interdisciplinary discipline” of human development. Exploring Signature Pedagogies, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444732-11
  12. Beale, R. (2025). Computer Science Education in the Age of Generative AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02183.
  13. Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2021). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40.
  14. Córdova-Esparza, D. (2025). AI-powered educational agents: Opportunities, innovations, and ethical challenges. Information, 16(6), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060469
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2024). Designing and conducting mixed methods research  (4th ed.). Sage Publications
  16. Di Eugenio, B., Fossati, D., & Green, N. (2021). Intelligent support for computer science education. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315168067
  17. Falloon, G. (2020). From simulations to real: Investigating young students’ learning and transfer from simulations to real tasks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 778–797.
  18. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  19. Funa, A. (2025). Exploring perspectives toward artificial intelligence integration in science education: A cross-generational study. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5243807 
  20. García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
  21. Getenet, S., & Tualaulelei, E. (2023). Using interactive technologies to enhance student engagement in higher education online learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244597
  22. Golhar, A. (2025). Integrating active learning strategies: A comprehensive approach through experiential, participative, problem-based, and inquiry-based methods in science education. Educational Quest- An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.1.2025.8 
  23. Golhar, A. R., Bhambri, M. N., Marganwar, R. K., Wanjari, R. T., & Yadao, B. G. (2025). Integrating active learning strategies: A comprehensive approach through experiential, participative, problem-based, and inquiry-based methods in science education. Educational Quest, 16(1), 59–63.
  24. Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024). Leveraging AI in e-learning: Personalized learning and adaptive assessment through cognitive neuropsychology—A systematic analysis. Electronics, 13(18), 3762. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2021.1901138
  25. Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., & Yang, S. J. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence–enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684
  26. Hunter, N. (2020). Learning-led disciplinary literacy in Science Education (Doctoral dissertation, Flinders University, College of Science and Engineering).
  27. Jalaluddin, R., Barolia, Ahmed Shiviji, R., & Amarsi, Y. (2025). Challenges in implementing methodological triangulation in mixed-method research. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 1180–1187. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.92 
  28. Jayaweera, R., Odhoch, L., Nabunje, J., Zuniga, C., Powell, B., Barasa, W., ... & Fetters, T. (2024). Feasibility of respondent-driven sampling to recruit participants with recent abortion experiences in humanitarian contexts: Protocol, study profile, and methodological assessment.
  29. Jia, F., Sun, D., & Looi, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in science education (2013–2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 94-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6
  30. Kim, J. (2023). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5
  31. Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of the Likert scale in education and social science research: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625-637.
  32. Lee, G., Yun, M., Zhai, X., & Crippen, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in science education research: Current states and challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–18.
  33. Lee, Y. J., & Wan, D. (2022). How complex or abstract are science learning outcomes? A novel coding scheme based on semantic density and gravity. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 493–509.
  34. Lewis, K., & Kuhfeld, M. (2023). Education’s long COVID: 2022-23 achievement data reveal stalled progress toward pandemic recovery—Center for School and Student Progress at NWEA.
  35. Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
  36. ‌Liman Anthony, S. (2020). Trends and issues in science education. SEAMEO RECSAM.
  37. Lopez, S. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in regional education: A holistic framework for inclusive, adaptive, and community-centric learning. Electronic Journal of Social and Strategic Studies, 06(01), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.47362/ejsss.2025.6102
  38. Maatuk, A., Alzahrani, M., & Alharthi, M. (2022). Digital learning tools and their impact on inclusive education in science. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-15.
  39. Mailaya, J. M., Joseph, M., Danladi, Z. S., Areola, E. O., & Goyit, D. T. (2024). Science and technology education in the secondary school system: Challenges and solutions for a promising future. Kashere Journal of Education, 7(2), 81–88.
  40. Martínez-Requejo, S., Jiménez García, E., Redondo Duarte, S., Ruiz Lázaro, J., Puertas Sanz, E., Y Mariscal Vivas, G. (2024). AI-driven student assistance: Chatbots redefining university support. INTED Proceedings, 1, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.0221
  41. McGowan, L. J., Powell, R., & French, D. P. (2020). How can the use of the theoretical domains framework be optimized in qualitative research? A rapid systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12437 
  42. Mishra, R. (2024, July). Utilizing online micro teaching as the main technique in education practice. In 2024 1st International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Integrated Communication in Changing Landscape of AI (ICSCAI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  43. Munce, S. E., Guetterman, T. C., & Jaglal, S. B. (2020). Using the exploratory sequential design for complex intervention development: Example of the development of a self-management program for spinal cord injury. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820901936
  44. Mutiga, A. N. (2024). AI integration in higher education: A content analysis on AI sophistication and student outcomes/skill development as reported in empirical studies (2019-2024) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno).
  45. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the 21st century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners.
  46. Pasumala, J., Penoliad, E. J., Embang, S., & Watanabe, K. (2024). Understanding the lived experiences of the generalist teachers in an inclusive classroom. Journal of Higher Education Research Disciplines, 9(1), 32–48.
  47. Pavlou, V., & Castro-Varela, A. (2024). E-learning canvases: Navigating the confluence of online arts education and sustainable pedagogies in teacher education. Sustainability, 16(5), 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051741
  48. Personalized learning with generative AI. (2025). Advances in educational technologies and instructional design, 61-104. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3474-4.ch004
  49. Pitcher, M. A. (2024). Transforming teacher role and practice: Assessment at the center (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
  50. Rajaram, K. (2019). Flipped classrooms: Providing a scaffolding support system with real-time learning interventions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 30–58.
  51. Rejoice Elikem Vorsah & Frank Oppong. (2024). Leveraging AI to enhance active learning strategies in science classrooms: Implications for teacher professional development. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(2), 1355-1370. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.2.3499
  52. Renacido, J. M. D., & Biray, E. T. (2025). Enhancing peer engagement and student motivation through AI-gamified interactive learning tools. In Advancing sustainable development goals with educational technology (pp. 277–342). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  53. Reyna, J., Ariza, M. R. Y Quesada Armenteros, A. (2025). Navigating the complexities of science education: Challenges and opportunities. INTED Proceedings, 1, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2025.0087
  54. Reynolds, R., Aromi, J., McGowan, C., & Paris, B. (2022). Digital divide, critical, and crisis-informatics perspectives on K-12 emergency remote teaching during the pandemic. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24654 
  55. Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(04), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009
  56. Saharan, V. A., Kulhari, H., Jadhav, H., Pooja, D., Banerjee, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Introduction to research methodology. Principles of Research Methodology and Ethics in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003088226-1 
  57. Sandiego.edu. (2024). 39 examples of artificial intelligence in education. Retrieved from https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/artificial-intelligence-education/
  58. Scheelbeek, P. F., Hamza, Y. A., Schellenberg, J., & Hill, Z. (2020). Improving the use of focus group discussions in low-income settings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01168-8 
  59. Scheelbeek, P. F., Hamza, Y. A., Schellenberg, J., & Hill, Z. (2020). Improving the use of focus group discussions in low-income settings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 287.
  60. Scribbr. (2021). Mixed methods research | Definition, guide & examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/mixed-methods-research/
  61. Shivolo, T., & Mokiwa, H. O. (2024). Secondary school teachers’ conceptions of teaching science practical work through inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 120–139. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.693
  62. Singh, R., Singh, S. K., & Mishra, N. (2024). Influence of e-learning on the students of higher education in the digital era: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20201–20221.
  63. Singun, A. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9
  64. Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
  65. Sphero. (2021). Learning gaps: Types, examples, and tips to solve them. Retrieved from https://sphero.com/blogs/news/learning-gaps
  66. Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Mudzamiri, E., & Chikuvadze, P. (2025). Practical work in Science and Mathematics Education in Zimbabwe.
  67. Sürücü, L., Yikilmaz, İ., & Maslakçi, A. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in quantitative research and practical considerations. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fgd4e
  68. Tamminen, K. A., Bundon, A., Smith, B., McDonough, M. H., Poucher, Z. A., & Atkinson, M. (2021). Considerations for making informed choices about engaging in open qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(5), 864–886. 
  69. Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Subjective data, objective data, and the role of bias in predictive modelling: Lessons from a dispositional learning analytics application. PloS one, 15(6), e0233977.
  70. Teplá, M., Teplý, P., & Šmejkal, P. (2022). Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8 
  71. Teplá, M., Teplý, P., & Šmejkal, P. (2022). Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 65.
  72. Toyon, M. A. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147–4478), 10(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1262
  73. TÜMEN AKYILDIZ, S., & AHMED, K. H. (2021). An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.866762
  74. Verawati, N. N., & Purwoko, A. A. (2024). Literature review on the use of interactive lab technology in the context of science education. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 1(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.12154
  75. Vorsah, R. E., & Oppong, F. (2024). Leveraging AI to enhance active learning strategies in science classrooms: implications for teacher professional development.
  76. Wang, H., & Lehman, J. D. (2021). Using achievement goal-based personalized motivational feedback to enhance online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09940-3 
  77. Widaman, K. F., & Helm, J. L. (2023). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Data analysis and research publication (Vol. 3) (2nd ed.), 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000320-017 
  78. Yambal, S., & Waykar, Y. A. (2025). Future of education using adaptive AI, intelligent systems, and ethical challenges. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, 171–202. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6527-4.ch006 
  79. Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3 
  80. Yılmaz, Ö. (2024). Personalised learning and artificial intelligence in science education: Current state and future perspectives. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2024(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.744 
  81. Yiu, M. (2025). Responsible AI Adoption in Community Mental Health Organizations: A Study of Leaders’ Perceptions and Decisions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
  82. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 1–27.
  83. Zhai, Y., et al. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based scaffolding system developed to support students’ scientific writing for STEM education.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic