HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Technology-Driven Sustainability in Developing Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis

Mary Ann Carranza | Gualberto A. Magdaraog Jr. | Allen Grace M. Sarmiento | Lilibeth DG. Antonio

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

To seek sustainable development worldwide, developing countries are confronted with the double challenge of pursuing economic growth and, at the same time, addressing pressing environmental and social problems, which present an urgent need for technology-based solutions. The study aims to visualize the intellectual and conceptual structure of technology and sustainability-related research in developing countries, to recognize its core themes and intellectual pathscaping. The study uses a bibliometric approach; co-citation and co-occurrence analyses were applied to a corpus of peer-reviewed journal articles from the Scopus database as of 2021. The findings indicate a field whose intellectual center does not feature foundational sustainability theories, but is surprisingly colonized by advanced econometric methodology papers, particularly panel data analysis. From a quantitative perspective, thematic analysis mainly revolves around significant issues (energy transitions, resource management, and the circular economy). The discussion and conclusion identify a key tension in the field. On one hand, the field’s empirical and methodological rigor ensures it generates robust, policy-relevant evidence. However, it potentially marginalizes the rich theoretical and qualitative perspectives on which a more complete understanding depends. This study suggests that the research landscape is methodologically advanced but theoretically limited, suggesting a significant imperative to combine diverse research traditions better to drive sustainable development theory and practice in the developing world.



References:

  1. Ahmed, J., & Alvi, A. A. (2024). Balancing economic growth and environmental sustainability in developing countries: The role of financial innovation. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options, 7(4), 9–19. https://tinyurl.com/4hzhhmvs
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Callon, M., Courtial, J. -P., & Laville, F. (1983). Co-word analysis as a tool for exploring the social mechanisms of knowledge. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4(4), 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708300400402
  4. Charamba, A. N., Kumba, H., & Makepa, D. C. (2025). Assessing the opportunities and obstacles of Africa’s shift from fossil fuels to renewable sources in the southern region. Clean Energy, zkae121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cleen.2025.zkae121
  5. Clifton, N., & Walpole, G. (2025). Innovations in innovation policy for the circular economy. In Innovations in Innovation Policy (pp. 35-52). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Crijns-Graus, W., Wild, P., Amineh, M. P., Hu, J., & Yue, H. (2022). International comparison of research and investments in new renewable electricity technologies: A focus on the European Union and China. Energies, 15(17), 6383. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176383
  7. D’Amato, A., D’Adamo, I., & Furlan, P. (2022). The role of technology in sustainable development: An integrated framework for assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.132145
  8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., & Pandey, N. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  9. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S. (2015). A sustainable supply chain model for the sweetener industry. Production Planning & Control, 26(10), 813-829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2014.991409
  10. Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0: A game changer for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(4), 737-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1792184
  11. Han, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Goi, N. (2025). Balancing economic growth and ecological sustainability: Factors affecting the development of renewable energy in developing countries. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 116, 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.085
  12. Hota, P. K., Kumar, S., & Mohan, C. (2020). Analysis of research trends in cloud computing: A bibliometric study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(2), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00892-8
  13. Kevat, V., Sakhare, A., & Mikkili, S. (2025). Performance analysis of super-lift luo, ultra-lift luo, boost, buck-boost, cuk, zeta and SEPIC DC-DC converters for extracting maximum power. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 46(1), 2476047. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2024.0015617
  14. Liu, P., Liang, L., & Lee, K. (2019). The role of university-industry collaboration in promoting technology-based sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.045
  15. Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
  16. Nikas, A., Koasidis, K., Köberle, A. C., Kourtesi, G., & Doukas, H. (2022). A comparative study of biodiesel in Brazil and Argentina: An integrated systems of innovation perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 112022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112022
  17. Nikas, A., & Nascimento, S. J. (2022). Biofuel innovations in Brazil: A pathway to sustainable development. Energy Policy Review, 20(3), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.7890/epr.2022.0039
  18. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
  19. Sallis, J. F., & Williams, A. J. (2021). Policy strategies for promoting sustainability in higher education: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 15(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408220944052
  20. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1973.46424.
  21. Tan Luc, D., Tran, T. D., & Yan, H. (2020). Exploring emerging research themes in smart cities: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(18), 7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187605
  22. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-0_10
  23. Wang, N., Akimoto, K., & Nemet, G. F. (2021). What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy, 158, 112546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112546
  24. Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Technological innovations and emission control in developing economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 30(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jem.2021.0010
  25. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization: A review. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562620