HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

Genetic Engineering in the Eyes of Future Engineers: Awareness, Attitudes, and Educational Implications

Reden E. Nolasco

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to add to the limited research on engineering students' perceptions of genetic engineering (GE), knowing that little is known about engineering students' awareness, attitudes, and perceptions of GE applications in the Philippine context. This research aimed to determine engineering students' awareness of GE applications and attitudes toward GE, and how research explores the possibilities of incorporating this in interdisciplinary courses, such as Chemistry for Engineers. Using a descriptive survey design, this study gathered data from sixty former first-year engineering students of a Catholic university who previously completed Chemistry for Engineers. A validated questionnaire sought demographic information, awareness of ten applications of GE, attitudes using a Likert scale, and openended perceptions. Quantitative data are analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data undergo thematic analysis. Overall, the results found high awareness of popularized applications, like cloning, DNA forensics, GM crops, and mRNA vaccines, but low awareness of more modern applications like CRISPR. Students reported generally positive attitudes toward GE applications in health and agriculture, but also expressed concerns regarding ethical and environmental implications. Students' awareness and attitudes towards GE varied based on strand or cluster, gender, and exposure to media. STEM students demonstrated greater awareness of GE applications and more favorable attitudes, as this strand typically uses science media. Students exposed more frequently to science media had more familiarity and generally positive views toward GE applications. The open-ended responses emphasized curiosity, perceived advantages in health (medicine) or agricultural and environmental management, and a need for clarity. The research findings show that infusing GE topics into Chemistry for Engineers helps engineering students advance scientific literacy, develop critical thinking, and position them to engage with emerging biotechnologies responsibly.



References:

  1. Amin, L., Khan, S., Zeb, T. F., & Ali, S. (2021). Knowledge and attitudes toward genetically modified (GM) food among health sciences university students in Karachi, Pakistan. Nutrition & Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-01-2021-0019 
  2. Calabrese, C., Schneider, S., & Clancy, K. (2021). Knowledge, values, and acceptance of gene editing: Cross-stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Science Communication, 20(7), A05. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20070205
  3. Chrispeels, H. E., Chapman, J. M., Gibson, C. L., & Muday, G. K. (2019). Peer teaching increases knowledge and changes perceptions about genetically modified crops in non–science major undergraduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), ar14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0169
  4. Department of Education – National Capital Region. (2024). Memorandum no. 421, s. 2024: Mainstreaming biotechnology and biosafety in the Philippine education sector. https://depedncr.com.ph
  5. Department of Education – Region VIII. (2024). Regional memorandum no. 332, s. 2024: Participation in DOST–NCBP biotechnology mainstreaming. https://tinyurl.com/mstjw3cj
  6. Department of Science and Technology – National Committee on Biosafety of the Philippines. (2024). Mainstreaming biotechnology and biosafety in the Philippine education sector. https://ncbp.dost.gov.ph/ongoing-projects/mbbpes
  7. Heinrich, B., Graulich, N., & Vázquez, O. (2020). Spicing up an interdisciplinary chemical biology course with the authentic big picture of epigenetic research. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1316–1326. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00779
  8. Jimenez, L., et al. (2022). Public engagement in biotechnology: Scoping review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar53. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-12-0281
  9. Li, L., & Bautista, J. R. (2019). Examining personal and media factors associated with attitude towards genetically modified foods among university students in Kunming, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234613
  10. Medani, K. R., Neill, A., Garrod, G., Ojo, M., & Hubbard, C. (2024). Societal perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops, feed, and food products in the Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey (MENAT) region: A systematic literature review. Food Quality and Preference, 117, Article 105148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105148
  11. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, & The Royal Society. (2020). Heritable human genome editing. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25665
  12. Oselinsky, M., et al. (2021). Effects of GMO labeling on college student food choices. Nutrients, 13(5), 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051532
  13. Perplexity AI. (2025). Perplexity (Feb 2025 version) [large language model]. https://www.perplexity.ai/
  14. Pew Research Center. (2022). Americans closely divided over editing a baby’s genes. https://www.pewresearch.org
  15. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.). Basic Books. https://archive.org/details/psychologyofchil0000piag
  16. Ramos, P. D., Almeida, M. S., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2023). What do people think about genetic engineering? A systematic review of questionnaire surveys before and after the introduction of CRISPR. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 5, 1284547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2023.1284547
  17. Rathod, D., & Hedaoo, R. P. (2022). Assessment of knowledge and attitudes on genetically modified foods among students studying life sciences. Cureus, 14(12), e32744. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32744
  18. Ripoll, V., Godino-Ojer, M., & Calzada, J. (2023). Development of engineering skills in students of biotechnology: Innovation project “from laboratory to industry.” Education for Chemical Engineers, 43, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.01.006
  19. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. https://archive.org/details/diffusionofinnov00ever
  20. Simon, E. J., Dickey, J. L., Burton, R. A., & Reece, J. B. (2019). Campbell essential biology (7th ed.). Pearson. https://tinyurl.com/22z4fnks
  21. Subica, A. M., & Link, B. G. (2023). CRISPR, public health, and equity implications. The Milbank Quarterly, 101(2), 435–467. https://doi.org/ 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307315
  22. University of the Philippines Diliman College of Science. (2024). UPD-CS launches awareness campaign on genetic modification and gene editing research. https://tinyurl.com/38er7mbd
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/mindinsocietydev0000vygo
  24. World Health Organization. (2021). Human genome editing: A framework for governance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030381
  25. Zhang, W., Zou, J., & Yue, T. (2022). Implicit and explicit attitudes of Chinese university students toward genetic modification. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1014395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014395