HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 6 no. 12 (2025)

Investigating Teachers' Perceptions, Challenges, and Support Systems in Handling a Visually Impaired Student in a Teacher Education Institution

Vida V. Antonio | Andrian D. Dela-cruz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Inclusive Education (IE) is a recognized right mandated by inter-national and Philippine policies, requiring schools to accommodate learners with disabilities, including those with visual impairment (VI). Teachers play a vital role in implementing IE, yet their readi-ness, perceptions, and access to support systems shape the effec-tiveness of inclusive practices. This study aimed to investigate teachers’ perceptions, challenges, and support systems in handling a student with VI in a Teacher Education Institution (TEI) in north-ern Philippines. A qualitative-descriptive case study design was em-ployed, involving 12 purposively selected teachers who had taught the student with VI in at least one semester. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s (2012) frame-work. Ethical protocols such as informed consent and confidential-ity were strictly observed. Findings revealed that teachers strongly valued inclusive educa-tion and emphasized empathy, patience, adaptability, and learner-centered approaches in teaching students with VI. They adopted flexible strategies such as tactile resources, auditory cues, and dif-ferentiated instruction. However, challenges included limited train-ing in Braille and inclusive pedagogy, lack of accessible resources, barriers in assessment, and difficulties in creating safe and inclusive classroom environments. Despite these, teachers received support through collegial collaboration, peer assistance, expert guidance from SPED teachers and ECSNED department staff, family involve-ment, access to assistive technologies, and institutional measures such as inclusive classroom setups and alternative assessments. In conclusion, teachers demonstrated commitment and creativity in promoting inclusion but faced systemic gaps in preparation and re-sources. Strengthening professional development, assistive technol-ogies, and institutional support is essential to sustain meaningful in-clusive education for students with visual impairment.



References:

  1. Ahmad Najmee N.A., Mohammed Z., Rahman M.H.A., Fadzil NM, Ludin A.F.M. (2024). Optimizing classroom environments for visually impaired school children a scop-ing review protocol. PLoS ONE 19(10): e0308149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308149
  2. Ahmad, F. K. (2015). Use of assistive technolo-gy in inclusive education: Making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience, 6, 62-77. https://www2.hu-ber-lin.de/transcience/Vol6_No2_62_77.pdf
  3. Albert, J. (2016). What do statistics say about basic education in the Philippines (No. 2016–19). Phillipine Institute for Devel-opment Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/6837
  4. Ampofo, J., Bentum-Micah, G., Xusheng, Q., Sun, B., & Asumang, R. M. (2025). Explor-ing the role of teacher empathy in student mental health outcomes: A comparative SEM approach to understanding the complexities of emotional support in ed-ucational settings. Frontiers in Psycholo-gy, 16, 1503258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503258
  5. Arslan, N., Ceylan, J. A., & Hatipoğlu, A. (2022). The relationship of fast food consumption with sociodemographic factors, body mass index and dietary habits among university students. Nutrition & Food Sci-ence, 53(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-01-2022-0003
  6. Awang, L. A., Yusop, F. D., & Danaee, M. (2024). Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathemat-ics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3), em0782. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14621
  7. Baring, F. L. S., Garces, M. E. L., Buenviaje, D. G., & Biag, M. A. B. (2024). Usability eval-uation of braille tactile audio device (BTAD): Basis for technological im-provement. International Journal of Fu-ture Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61367/ijfmr040131
  8. Beirnes, S. (2022). Learner-centered pedagogy and student engagement in a virtual ele-mentary instrumental music pro-gram. International Journal of Music Edu-cation, 40(4), 530 - 541. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221074378
  9. Benemerito, P., Delos Reyes, N. R. T., Espina, R. C., Peteros, E. D., & Sitoy, R. E. (2024). The role of professional development in enhancing pedagogical practices of teachers in inclusive classrooms. Interna-tional Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijisae/v12i3.7351
  10. Berndtsson, I. C. (2024). Lived experiences of learning to use a long cane: the im-portance of integrating perceptual, exis-tential, and social dimensions for active cane use. Qualitative Health Re-search. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241277111
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analy-sis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsycholog-ical, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Associa-tion. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
  12. Campado, R. J., Dabi Toquero, C. M., & Ulanday, D. M. P. (2023). Integration of assistive technology in teaching learners with special educational needs and disa-bilities in the Philippines. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(1), ep2308. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13062
  13. Chorosova, O. M., Solomonova, G. S., & Struchkov, V. G. (2020). Prospects for the development of digital educational envi-ronment in North-Eastern Federal Uni-versity in the context of Adult Educa-tion. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research/Advances in Eco-nomics, Business and Management Re-search. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200312.388
  14. Commission on Higher Education. (2000). CHED Memorandum Order No. 023, series of 2000: Quality education for learners with special needs. Commission on Higher Education. https://legaldex.com/laws/quality-education-for-learners-with-special-needs
  15. Congress of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533. In Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  16. Congress of the Philippines. (2022). Republic Act No. 11650. Supreme Court E-library. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/94483
  17. Dabi G. K., Golga D. N. (2022). Availability, awareness, and utilization of assistive technologies among students with visual impairment: The case of Haramaya Uni-versity, Ethiopia. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221124420
  18. Dagunduro, C., Ajuwon, P., Ediae, P., Lahcen, P., & Paradiso, P. (2024). Adaptive learn-ing models for diverse classrooms: En-hancing educational equity. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sci-ences, 6(9), 2228–2240. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijarss.2024.6.9.2228
  19. De Borba, N. J., Ferreira, V. a. S., Santos, T. P. D., & Carvalho, S. (2024). Inclusive educa-tion. Revista Gênero E Interdiscipli-naridade, 5(03), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v5i03.2073
  20. De Oliveira, L.S. (2025). Curricular and meth-odological adaptations for teaching inclu-sive chemistry in high school. RCMOS – Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal of Knowledge, 1. https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.857
  21. De Sousa Crepaldi, L., Silva, M. A. F. da, Silva, E. A. da, Silva, L. B. da, Silva, L., Meller, E. B., Rodrigues, A. P. D. C. D., Silva, S. C. da, Silva, J. B. R. da, Montes, K. S. D. C., & Barbosa, A. M. P. B. (2024). The role of games and play in the cognitive develop-ment of children with disabilities. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 26(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-26100107
  22. De Verdier, K. (2016). Inclusion in and out of the classroom: A longitudinal study of students with visual impairments in in-clusive education. British Journal of Visu-al Impairment, 34(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619615625428
  23. Debasu, H., & Yitayew, A. (2024). Examining elements of designing and managing of creating inclusive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Interna-tional Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2024.39.4
  24. Demirdiş, B. (2024). Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education in Türkiye. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(43), 2468–2491. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1468104
  25. Dube, B. (2022). Rural online learning in the context of COVID-19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
  26. Dumbuya, E. (2025). Inclusive curriculum de-velopment for special education and dif-ferentiated instruction. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5018551
  27. Evans, C. (2020). Exploiting students’ part-time work to enhance learning, teaching and assessment. Industry and Higher Educa-tion, 35, 10-13.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220930182
  29. Fadiana, M., Widiyanti, I.S.R., and Mizan, S. (2022). Development of tactil audio me-dia for low vision students. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um005v6i12022p059
  30. Fearm, S. (2022). Introduction to design edu-cation, chapter on teaching as perfor-mance. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003049166-20/teaching-performance-steven-faerm
  31. Fitas, R. (2025). Inclusive education with AI: Supporting special needs and tackling language barriers. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14120
  32. Gomes, R. L. R., Santos de Oliveira, E. G., Menezes, F. F. de, Silva, F. M. D., Fontes, I. M., & Pereira, J. R. M. C. et al. (2025). Dig-ital inclusion in full time education: Im-pacts on organizational climate and pro-fessional development. In Transforming Education: The Future of Learning (pp. 58-73). https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2025.002 003
  33. Harutyunyan, M., & Aleksanyan, M. (2023). Cooperation between specialists while providing psycho-pedagogical support to children with special education needs. Main Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology, 10(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v2i10.11
  34. Hayes, C., & Proulx, M. J. (2023). Turning a blind eye? Removing barriers to science and mathematics education for students with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(2), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221149561
  35. Hovey, K. A., Gauvreau, A. N., & Lohmann, M. J. (2022). Providing multiple means of ac-tion and expression in the early child-hood classroom through a universal de-sign for learning framework. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1150
  36. Johnson, C. A., Gerwin, K. L., Tichenor, S. E., Tichenor, M. P., & Walsh, B. (2024). Eval-uating stuttering self-stigma and its rela-tionship to adverse impact in children and adolescents with the child stuttering self-stigma scale. Journal of Speech, Lan-guage, and Hearing Research, 67(9), 2920–2934. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00069
  37. Joshi, H., & Joseph, S. (2024). ULMFiT: Univer-sal language model fine-tuning for text classification. International Journal of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technol-ogy, 4(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.54105/ijamst.E3049.04061024
  38. Kapil, Y., Jeyaprathaban, S., & Halder, T. (2024). Effectiveness of universal design of learning for students with mild intel-lectual disabilities - a review. Interna-tional Journal of Research and Re-view, 11(3), 271-280.
  39. Karvonen, M., Swinburne Romine, R. & Clark, A., (2024). Response process evidence for academic assessments of students with significant cognitive disabilities, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evalua-tion, 29(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.7275/pare.2060
  40. Kerdar, S. H., Bächler, L., & Kirchhoff, B. M. (2024). The accessibility of digital tech-nologies for people with visual impair-ment and blindness: A scoping review. Universal Access in the Information Socie-ty, 27, Article 24.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-00962-6
  42. Kiryakova, G., & Kozhuharova, D. (2024). Ad-dressing pedagogical digital competen-cies in Bulgarian pre-service teacher edu-cation: A curriculum and policy analysis. Education Sciences, 15(4), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040404
  43. Koehler, K. E. and Wild, T. A. (2019). students with visual impairments' access and par-ticipation in the science curriculum: Views of teachers of students with visual impairments, Journal of Science Educa-tion for Students with Disabilities, 22(1).
  44. Kushwaha, R. K., & Maurya, H. K. (2024). Insti-tutional barriers to inclusive assessment for students with special needs in Indian Higher Education. Khwopa Journal, 6(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.3126/kjour.v6i2.73221
  45. Kyamko, V. F., Tenerife, J. J., Opingo, K. M., Pinili, L., Espina, R., & Suson, R. (2024). Teacher perceptions and collaborative ef-forts in inclusive education: A path to ef-fective implementation. World Journal on Education and Humanities Research, 4(3), 286–296. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385420527_Teacher_ Percep-tions_and_Collaborative_Efforts_in_Inclusive_Education_A_Path_to_Effective_Implementation
  46. Lakkala, S., Beaton, M. C., & Kokko, K. (2024). A conceptual analysis of inclusive educa-tion in terms of participation and agency. Support for Learning, 39(3), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12477
  47. LAWPHil (2022). Republic Act No. 11650. The LAWPHil project, Arellano law founda-tion Philippine laws and jurisprudence databank. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11650_2022.html
  48. Lebeco, E. E. and Verano, M.L.E. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions on the implemen-tation of inclusive education (IE) in public elementary schools in Northern Samar. International Journal of Research and In-novation in Social Science, 792), 1003-1010.
  49. Li, L., & Li, L. (2024). Research on the embod-iment of educational equity in inclusive education: Present situation. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 52(1), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/52/20241612
  50. Lyanda, J.N. & Owidi, S. (20225). Affective pedagogy and emotional intelligence in online learning: Enhancing teacher-student relationships. Research Journal of Education Teaching and Curriculum Studies 3(1), 15-25. https:/doi.org/10.58721/rjetcs.v3i1.891
  51. Magaba, V. (2022). Inclusive education – A prescript to engagement by all stake-holders. EDConference Proceedings, 70–83. https://www.ed- confer-ence.org/uploads/1/1/4/7/11479227/edc2022_07.pdf
  52. Manligoy, R. G. (2017). Teachers' attitude to-wards inclusive education and their sense of well-being. University of Mindanao Re-pository. http://103.123.43.47:8080/handle/20.500.14045/711
  53. Mboshi, S. (2018). Teaching learners with vis-ual impairment in an inclusive education setting: the Cameroon perspective. Inter-national Journal of Education and Re-search, 6(2), 109-114. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/February-2018/11.pdf
  54. Mir, T. T., Arif, A., & Gul, F. (2023). Assessment rubrics as effective feedback: Prospective teachers' perceptions and practices. Global Educational Studies Review, 8(2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).27
  55. Miyauchi, H. (2020). A systematic review on inclusive education of students with visual impairment. MDPI Education Sciences.
  56. Nkomo, D. and Dube, B. (2022). Implementa-tion of open and distance learning pro-grammes in primary teacher education in Zimbabwe. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(11).
  57. Odhiambo, J. A. (2024). Exploring the attitudes of girl learners with physical disabilities towards education in Kisumu, Kenya. In-ternational Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(2), 68–71.
  58. Pădeanu, L. (2023). Differentiated teaching-learning-assessment of students with dis-abilities in mainstream education. Review of Psychopedagogy, 12(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.56663/rop.v12i1.64
  59. Park, J. and Lee, J. (2024). The role of grit in inclusive education: A study of motivation and achievement among preservice physi-cal education teachers. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332464
  60. Pattiasina, P.J., Hikmah, H., & Nugroho, P. (2024). The effect of project-based learn-ing (pbl) method on improving students' writing ability. Jurnal of Pedagogi : Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(5).
  61. Pov, S., & Kawai, N. (2024). Are teachers ade-quately prepared for inclusive classrooms in Cambodia? Knowledge and experience for inclusive practices. International Jour-nal of Instruction, 17(3), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17327a
  62. Priyadharsini, V., & Sahaya, M. R. (2024). Uni-versal Design for Learning (UDL) in inclu-sive education: Accelerating learning for all. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(4), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i4.7489
  63. Quiño-Justol, J. B. (2024). Perspectives of teachers on the integration of assistive technology in higher education inclusive classrooms in the Philippines: Im-portance, benefits, social support, and challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(12), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0428
  64. Rodriguez, J. (2019). Moving towards inclusive education for all: Examining stakeholder perceptions of educating students with special needs in schools operated by the Jordan field of the UNRWA. International Journal of Disability Development and Education 68(4), 1-19. DOI:10.1080/1034912X.2019.1671580
  65. Sandelius, S. (2024). Maximizing student suc-cess: The pivotal role of collaborative planning in inclusive education. The Abil-ity Challenge. https://theabilitychallenge.org/blog/maximizing-student-success-the-pivotal-role-of-collaborative-planning-in-inclusive-education
  66. Sasikala, C. (2023). Attitudes towards inclu-sive education among prospective teachers. Shanlax International Jour-nal of Arts, Science, and Humanities, 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11iS1-Nov.6861
  67. Sele, J. P., & Mukundi, M. B. (2023). The impact of emotional intelligence on pedagogy: Fostering a supportive classroom envi-ronment. Greener Journal of Social Sci-ences, 13(1), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2023.1.122024210
  68. Sivanathan, I., Thamburaj, K.P., Ponniah, K., Arumugum, L., & Rajamani, R. (2024). Transforming classroom dynamics: A comparative analysis of U-style, Vstyle, and circle innovative teaching tech-niques. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(10) 2024, Pages: 105-113. https://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/Articles/2024/2024-11-10/1021833ijaas202410012.pdf
  69. Tenerife, J. J. L., Peteros, E., Zaragoza, I. D., de Vera, J. V., Pinili, L. C., & Fulgencio, M. D. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions on their competence and the benefits of inclusive education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 6. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v19i1.7784
  70. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cul-tural Organization (UNESCO) (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254
  71. Vergara, M., Pinili, L., Reyes, N. R. D., Sitoy, R., Espina, R., & Saladaga, L. (2025). Teach-ers’ preparedness for inclusive education: Analyzing knowledge, confidence, and classroom management. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.53935/2641533x.v8i2.323
  72. Veshal, I. (2024). Enhancing inclusive educa-tion: A comprehensive guide to universal design for learning (UDL). https://doi.org/10.22541/au.171052965.50164898/v1
  73. You, H., Park, S., & Hong, M. (2024). Unveiling effectiveness: A meta analysis of profes-sional development programs in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21985.
  74. Zakiah, W. G., Karsidi, R., & Yusuf, M. (2024). The implementation of inclusive educa-tional policies in elementary school. Jurnal Pedidikan Pengajaran, 54(1):130. DOI:10.23887/jpp.v54i1.32210