Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 12 (2025)

Advancing Electrical Technology Education: Investigating the Impact of Immersive Simulation Tools on Hands-On Learning Outcomes

Christian Borromeo | Regie Boy B. Fabro | Shiela Mae G. Juan | Dariel Justin V. Daquioag | Peter John P. Ladran | Johnson A. Blanco | Christian G. Balintec

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the effectiveness of immersive simulation tools in enhancing hands-on learning, engagement, and practical skills among Bachelor of Technical Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTEd) Electrical Technology students. Recognizing the challenges of tradi-tional laboratory-based training, such as safety risks, limited re-sources, and restricted practice opportunities, the study explores how immersive technologies can address these limitations. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, the study combines quantitative ap-proaches, including pre-test and post-test assessments and surveys, with qualitative methods, such as focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews, to comprehensively evaluate the tools' impact. Conducted in a teacher education institution in Ilocos Norte, the study involves third-year electrical technology students and their instruc-tors. Results indicate that immersive simulation tools significantly im-prove students’ practical skills, as evidenced by a statistically signifi-cant increase in post-test scores. Both students and instructors per-ceive these tools as highly effective and user-friendly, emphasizing their ability to simplify complex concepts, enhance skill acquisition, and foster confidence. The tools also provide realistic and safe envi-ronments for practicing high-risk tasks, such as working with high-voltage equipment, reducing safety concerns while promoting deeper learning. However, challenges such as technical issues, limited access to equipment, high costs, and the need for training are identified as barriers to broader adoption. The study concludes that immersive simulation tools are a transformative innovation in technical educa-tion, offering safer, more engaging, and effective learning experiences. It recommends future research to include longitudinal studies track-ing the long-term impact of these tools on career readiness and professional success, as well as strategies to address implementation challenges and ensure wider accessibility.



References:

  1. Abeygunawardena, N., & Jathunga, T. (2024). Perceptions of Virtual Reality as a Learn-ing Tool in Electrical and Electronic En-gineering. International Journal of Re-search and Innovation in Social Science, (special issue?), 639-646. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8110051
  2. Agbo, F. J., Olaleye, S. A., Bower, M., & Oyelere, S. S. (2023). Examining the relationships between students’ perceptions of tech-nology, pedagogy, and cognition: The case of immersive virtual reality mini games to foster computational thinking in higher education. Smart Learning Envi-ronments, 10(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00233-1
  3. Albarracín-Acero, A., et al. (2024). Virtual real-ity in the classroom: Transforming the teaching of direct current electrical cir-cuits. Future Internet, 16(8), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16080279
  4. Amin, I., Widiaty, C., Yulia, C., & Abdullah, A. G. (2022). The application of virtual reality (VR) in vocational education: A systemat-ic review. In Proceedings of the 4th In-ternational Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education (ICIEVE 2021) (pp. 112–120). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220305.024
  5. Azzam, I., El Breidi, K., Breidi, F., & Mousas, C. (2024). Virtual Reality in Fluid Power Education: Impact on Students’ Perceived Learning Experience and Engagement. Education Sciences, 14(7), 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070764
  6. Barrett, A. J., Pack, A., & Quaid, E. D. (2021). Understanding learners’ acceptance of high-immersion virtual reality systems: Insights from confirmatory and explora-tory PLS-SEM analyses. Computers & Ed-ucation, 169, Article 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104214
  7. Brylska, K., Gackowski, T., Kwiatkowska, A., & Dudziak-Kisio, M. (2024). Learning effi-ciency – virtual reality lesson vs tradi-tional lesson. Information Technology & People, 37(8), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2022-0631
  8. Bower, M., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in education. British Jour-nal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1981–1990. Article e13038. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13038
  9. Cabural, A. B. (2024). Enhancing conceptual understanding of electricity and mag-netism through VR simulations. Interna-tional Journal of Current Science Re-search and Review, 7(10), 4914–4921. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i10-50
  10. Carpio, A. M., & Santos, P. R. (2021). Virtual simulation as a pedagogical tool in Phil-ippine higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(6), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1890321
  11. Cao, Y., Ng, G.-W., & Ye, S.-S. (2023). Design and Evaluation for Immersive Virtual Re-ality Learning Environment: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15(3), 1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031964
  12. Ernita, N., Bahtiar, B., Zulkarnaen, Z., Mustofa, H. A., & Faresta, R. A. (2024). Online self-regulated learning assisted by virtual labs to train STEM students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1917
  13. Fabro, R. B. B., Rivera, E. C. C., Rivera, J. C., Ra-bang, N. T. G. S., Asuncion, A. C., & Limon, M. R. (2023). Struggling, Coping, and Per-sisting in New Normal Education: Pre-Service Teachers in Field Study Courses. TEM Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM121-45
  14. Fernandes, F. A., Camargo Rodrigues, C. S., Teixeira, E. N., & Werner, C. (2022). Im-mersive Learning Frameworks: A Sys-tematic Literature Review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.14179
  15. Fortuna, A., Prasetya, F., Cabanillas García, J. L., Arcelus-Ulibarrena, J. M., Salman, A., Karimi, A., & Yusuf, A. (2024). Modern learning paradigms: A bibliometric analy-sis of augmented reality and virtual reali-ty in vocational education. Jurnal Pen-didikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 7(2), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.24036/jptk.v7i2.36523
  16. Hassan, J., Devi, A., & Ray, B. (2022). Virtual Laboratories in Tertiary Education: Case Study Analysis by Learning Theories. Ed-ucation Sciences, 12(8), Article 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080554
  17. James, W., Oates, G., & Schonfeldt, N. (2024). Improving retention while enhancing student engagement and learning out-comes using gamified mobile technology. Accounting Education, 4(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326009.
  18. Khamis, H., Jantan, A. H., Roslan, N. A., & Ab-dullah, L. N. (2024). Immersive Learning Factors Using Virtual Reality in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Re-view (SLR). Environment-Behaviour Pro-ceedings Journal, 10(SI32), Article 7053. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI32.7053
  19. Lee, Y. J., & Ji, Y. G. (2024). Effects of Visual Realism on Avatar Perception in Immer-sive and Non-Immersive Virtual Envi-ronments. International Journal of Hu-man–Computer Interaction, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2351713.
  20. Li, Y., Shen, Y., & Sukenik, C. I. (2024, June). Immersive virtual labs for enhancing in-person and online education [Paper presentation]. 2024 ASEE Annual Confer-ence & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--47552
  21. Long, Y., Zhang, X., & Zeng, X. (2024). Applica-tion and effect analysis of virtual reality technology in vocational education prac-tical training. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 9755-9786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13197-7
  22. Lu, A., Wong, C. S. K., Cheung, R. Y. H., & Im, T. S. W. (2021). Supporting flipped and gam-ified learning with augmented reality in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 623745. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.623745
  23. Mat Sanusi, K. A., Iren, D., Fanchamps, N., & others. (2025). Virtual virtuoso: A sys-tematic literature review of immersive learning environments for psychomotor skill development. Educational Technol-ogy Research and Development, 73(2), 909–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10449-2
  24. Nechypurenko, P., Semerikov, S., & Pokhlie-stova, O. (2023). An augmented reality-based virtual chemistry laboratory to support educational and research activi-ties of 11th grade students. Educational Dimension, 8. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4446.
  25. Nikou, S. A., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2024). Exploring Teachers’ Compe-tences to Integrate Augmented Reality in Education: Results from an International Study. TechTrends, 68(6), 1208-1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01014-4
  26. Oyserman, D., & Dawson, A. (2024). Successful learning environments support and har-ness students’ identity-based motivation: A primer. In Virtual Learning Environ-ments (pp. 67–82). Routledge.
  27. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032726663-6
  28. Petersen, G. B., Stenberdt, V., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2023). Collaborative gen-erative learning activities in immersive virtual reality increase learning. Comput-ers & Education, 207, 104931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104931.
  29. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Ra-za, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and en-gagement. Interactive Learning Environ-ments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886.
  30. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic re-view of immersive virtual reality applica-tions for higher education: Design ele-ments, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  31. Rafiq, A. A., Triyono, M. B., & Djatmiko, I. W. (2022). Enhancing student engagement in vocational education by using virtual re-ality. Waikato Journal of Education, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v27i3.964
  32. Ravichandran, R., & Mahapatra, J. (2023). Vir-tual reality in vocational education and training: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Digital Learning and Educa-tion, 3(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v3i1.602
  33. Reis, V., Santos Baptista, J., & Duarte, J. (2025). Immersive Tools in Engineering Educa-tion — A Systematic Review. Applied Sci-ences, 15(11), 6339. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116339
  34. Siregar, E., Kusumawardani, D., & Bunyamin, E. M. (2022). Virtual laboratory for prac-tical learning in vocational education us-ing Nine Events of Instruction approach. Journal of Education Research and Eval-uation, 6(3), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.47691
  35. Sivapriyan, R., Raj, L., Selvi, T., & Raj, G. (2024). Literature review on augmented reality in electrical engineering educa-tion. 2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/INOCON60754.2024.10511984
  36. Susilana, R., Dewi, L., & Rullyana, G. (2024). Exploring student perceptions of virtual learning experiences: A study of the use of the Spatial.io 3D Metaverse platform. Journal of Education Technology, 8(4), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i4.85190
  37. Sviridova, E., Yastrebova, E., Bakirova, G., & Rebrina, F. (2023). Immersive technolo-gies as an innovative tool to increase ac-ademic success and motivation in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1192760. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1192760.
  38. Tenzin, D., Utha, K., & Seden, K. (2023). Effec-tiveness of simulation, hands-on and a combined strategy in enhancing concep-tual understanding on electric circuit: a comparative study. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(4), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2202388
  39. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
  40. Villanueva, D. P., & Garcia, M. R. (2020). The effectiveness of virtual labs in improving problem-solving skills of engineering students in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00214-3
  41. Yanto, D. T. P., Sukardi, Kabatiah, M., Zaswita, H., & Candra, O. (2023). Analysis of Fac-tors Affecting Vocational Students’ Inten-tions to Use a Virtual Laboratory Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. In-ternational Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(12), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.38627
  42. Yanto, D. T. P., Sukardi, Kabatiah, M., Zaswita, H., & Candra, O. (2023). Development of Virtual Learning using Problem-Based Learning Models for Vocational Educa-tion Students. Elinvo (Electronics, Infor-matics, and Vocational Education), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v7i2.52473
  43. Zheng, Y., et al. (2025). Application and effect analysis of virtual reality technology in vocational education practical training. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 9755–9786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13197-7
  44. Ziyang, Z., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2025). Im-mersive Virtual Reality in Vocational School: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Re-search in Progressive Education and De-velopment, 14(1), 1294-1309. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24694

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic