Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 46 no. 2 (2025)

Discursive Style in Teaching Mathematics: Its Impact on Grade Three Pupils' Performance

Raihani Mindalano | Camilo Baldonado

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the impact of discursive teaching styles on the mathematical performance of Grade 3 pupils at Balo-i Central Elementary School during the third quarter of the academic year 2024–2025, employing a one-group pretest-posttest design to examine the influence of teacher-student interactions, questioning techniques, feedback, and classroom discussions on students' comprehension of mathematical concepts. By comparing pretest and posttest scores, the research assesses whether discursive teaching strategies significantly enhance mathematical performance. The findings reveal a notable increase in posttest scores, indicating that interactive teaching methods have a positive influence on learning outcomes. Specifically, structured classroom discourse techniques, such as revoicing, negotiating meaning, and guided questioning, were shown to improve students' problem-solving abilities and deepen their understanding of math concepts. These results align with the existing literature, which emphasizes the value of student-centered and communicative approaches in fostering engagement and critical thinking in mathematics. However, the study's scope is limited to a single institution, suggesting that its findings may not be fully generalizable to other contexts due to variations in student demographics, instructional environments, and prior knowledge levels. As such, future studies are recommended to involve broader sample sizes across multiple schools to validate and extend the findings and examine the long-term impacts of discursive teaching. Nonetheless, this research adds to the growing body of knowledge on effective mathematics instruction by demonstrating that incorporating discourse in the classroom enhances both student participation and comprehension. It offers practical implications for educators, encouraging the adoption of interactive strategies that foster dialogue, questioning, and reflective thinking to enhance mathematical learning. In conclusion, discursive teaching presents a promising approach to developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills among young learners, underscoring the importance of dynamic and communicative instructional practices in primary mathematics education.



References:

  1. Adams, R. J. (2021). Effective teaching strategies for enhancing student engagement and learning. Routledge.
  2. Ahmed, R., & Khan, M. (2020). Structured teacher-led discourse and its impact on students’ problem-solving abilities. Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(2), 112-134.
  3. Balenky, M. et al. (2023). Learning and knowledge construction: Objective reasoning in mathematics education. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 157-178.
  4. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2021). Mathematical understanding and the role of representation in teaching and learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(3), 389-405.
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2020). “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
  6. Battista, M. T. (2020). Reasoning and proving in mathematics education: The importance of definitions and logical deduction. Journal of Mathematics Learning, 18(2), 221-240.
  7. Boaler, J. (2019). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
  8. Brown, J., & Taylor, S. (2021). The role of teacher facilitation in mathematical discourse: Strategies for inclusivity and engagement. Educational Review, 39(3), 187-204.
  9. Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). Collaborative learning and discourse in mathematics: Enhancing problem-solving skills through group discussions. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 67-89.
  10. Clark, R., Kirschner, P., & Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory: Research that teachers really need to understand. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 135-152.
  11. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (2020). The importance of discourse in mathematics education: Teacher facilitation and student engagement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(4), 467-489.
  12. Cotanuto, M. (2020). Mathematical literacy in the modern world: The need for computational reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(3), 198-215.
  13. Daniels, H. (2017). Vygotsky and pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  14. Department of Education. (2015). Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015)
  15. Diaz, P. (2021). Revoicing techniques in classroom discussions: Improving comprehension and test scores. Journal of Learning and Teaching, 30(1), 56-74.
  16. Evans, K. (2023). Addressing learning gaps through discursive teaching practices in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(4), 245-263.
  17. Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2021). Classroom discourse and mathematical understanding: Moving beyond traditional initiation-response-evaluation sequences. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40(3), 205-223.
  18. Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2023). Encouraging student discourse in mathematics classrooms: Strategies for active learning. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Journal, 115(1), 67-82.
  19. Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2019). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C.T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8-33). Teachers College Press
  20. Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2019). Learners’ understanding of the definition and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 32-52.
  21. Gee, J. P. (2019). Discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
  22. Gilligan, C. (2020). The role of personal beliefs and emotions in mathematical reasoning and learning. Cognition and Instruction, 38(2), 112-130.
  23. Gonzalez, R., & Rivera, L. (2021). Fostering critical thinking through revoicing and orienting strategies in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 42(3), 201-220.
  24. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (2020). Perspectives on cognition and learning: A framework for mathematical instruction analysis. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 319-336.
  25. Grouws, D. A., & Cebulla, K. J. (2020). Improving student achievement in mathematics: The role of conceptual understanding in procedural fluency. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(3), 410-425.
  26. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2017). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
  27. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2021). The power of feedback in the learning process: Implications for classroom practice. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 435-461.
  28. Hendry, G. (2020). Problem-posing and student engagement in mathematics learning. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 32(2), 178-192.
  29. Johnson, P., & Lee, H. (2020). Dialogic teaching strategies: Enhancing conceptual understanding in elementary mathematics. Teaching and Learning Journal, 27(3), 142-159.
  30. Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2020). Promoting conceptual understanding through discursive classroom practices. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45(1), 67-82.
  31. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2023). Mathematical proficiency for all students: The role of teachers in fostering understanding. National Research Council, 58(2), 134-162.
  32. Kim, S., & Park, J. (2020). Negotiating and concretizing: Developing mathematical reasoning in grade school students. Mathematics Education Review, 36(1), 98-117.
  33. Lin, T. J., & Gresalfi, M. (2020). Teacher-student interactions in mathematics classrooms: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Mathematics Education, 51(4), 345-362.
  34. Lopez, C. (2019). Student-led discussions in mathematics: Enhancing problem-solving skills and confidence. Educational Mathematics Journal, 29(2), 102-119.
  35. Martinez, R., & Cruz, D. (2021). Revoicing in mathematics classrooms: Improving confidence and correcting misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 33(4), 184-202.
  36. Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2020). The impact of classroom talk on student learning: A review of evidence-based practices. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2019). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 1-12.
  38. Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2023). The role of revoicing in supporting students’ mathematical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 212-230.
  39. Nguyen, T. (2020). Concretizing abstract concepts: Teacher-led discussions in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Instruction, 31(1), 78-96.
  40. Nguyen, V. (2022). Discursive teaching approaches and problem-solving abilities in mathematics classrooms. Teaching Mathematics Today, 46(3), 211-230.
  41. Noreen, S., et al. (2019). Impact of teacher discourse on student behavior and achievement: A study on cooperative learning in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(4), 221-245.
  42. O’Connor, M. C. (2021). Position-driven discussions in mathematics classrooms: A strategy for enhancing student reasoning. Educational Dialogues Journal, 29(4), 356-372.
  43. Patel, K., & Sharma, N. (2022). The use of visual aids in mathematical discourse: Enhancing learning outcomes through discussions. Mathematics Teaching Journal, 41(2), 145-165.
  44. Pickreign, J. (2019). Difficulties in classifying quadrilaterals: Implications for geometry curriculum design. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 10(4), 278-293.
  45. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). An Act Enhancing the Philippine Basic Education System by Strengthening Its Curriculum and Increasing the Number of Years for Basic Education.
  46. Richardson, V. (2017). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Considerations for teacher educators. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings (pp.145-162). Falmer Press.
  47. Saad, L. (2021). Mathematics as the most challenging subject for teenagers: Findings from the latest Gallup youth survey. Gallup Research Reports, 54(1), 87-105.
  48. Salandanan, G. G. (2023). Constructivist approaches in mathematics education: Meaning-making through past experiences. Educational Psychology Journal, 47(1), 56-74.
  49. Schifter, D. (2019). Contrasting traditional and constructivist approaches in mathematics instruction. Journal of Mathematical Thinking, 24(3), 123-139.
  50. Sfard, A. (2020). Acquisition vs. participation: Two alternative models of learning in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1), 23-45.
  51. Sierpinka, A. (2019). Mathematical discourse and cultural relevance in curriculum development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 41(2), 211-229.
  52. Smith, J. (2023). Teacher-student dialogue: Boosting understanding and application of mathematical concepts. Journal of Educational Research, 55(2), 177-195.
  53. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory in teaching mathematics: Implications for instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 23-45.
  54. Sweller, J. Ayres, P., & Kalyuga. S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.).Springer.
  55. Thomas, E. (2023). Dialogic teaching and student engagement in mathematical learning. International Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 37(1), 89-110.
  56. Torres, M., & Ramos, J. (2023). Discursive teaching strategies in mixed-ability classrooms: Addressing diverse learning needs in mathematics. Mathematics Education Quarterly, 38(3), 155-172.
  57. Van Oers, B. (2021). Mathematics as a cultural practice: Initiating students into mathematical discourse. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(1), 89-107.
  58. Van Oers, B. (2021). Teacher-student relationships and authority in mathematics classrooms: A communication model approach. Journal of Mathematics Pedagogy, 19(3), 142-158.
  59. Williams, A., & Carter, B. (2021). Collaborative discourse in mathematics: Enhancing student engagement and academic performance. Journal of Mathematics Learning, 43(2), 122-140.
  60. Wilson, R., & Parker, S. (2019). Structured mathematical discourse: Connecting theory with real-world applications. Journal of Educational Strategies, 26(4), 192-210.
  61. Wong, T. (2019). The effectiveness of multi-modal strategies in mathematics instruction: A pilot study. Proceedings of the Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education (SEACME) – 8, 31-47.
  62. Wu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Dialogic teaching methods and student performance: Orienting and negotiating in mathematics classrooms. Educational Research and Development, 48(3), 221-239.
  63. Zack, V., & Graves, B. (2020). Student participation and identity in mathematical discourse. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 35(2), 98-117.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic