HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 46 no. 5 (2025)

Stakeholders' Engagement in the Strategic, Operational and Tactical Planning and Implementation Cycles of Programs and Projects of Public Secondary Schools in the Division of Rizal

Elmerson Paulete | Adriel G. Roman

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Effective stakeholder engagement is crucial for the successful planning and implementation of school programs, particularly in secondary education, where diverse internal and external stakeholders significantly influence outcomes. This study evaluates stakeholder involvement in the strategic, operational, and tactical planning phases, as well as the program implementation cycles of secondary schools during the 2024–2025 academic year. Employing a descriptivecorrelation survey design, data were collected through a questionnaire checklist that assessed the participation levels of both internal (staff and administrators) and external (parents and community members) stakeholders. The findings reveal that strategic planning activities consistently maintain mean values, predominantly reflecting the viewpoints of internal stakeholders. Operational planning demonstrated higher mean values compared to strategic and tactical planning, indicating more frequent application. Tactical planning showed lower mean values, suggesting limited utilization. Implementation stages were highly effective across all domains, indicating successful execution of plans; however, monitoring and evaluation stages showed notable deficiencies, especially from the perspective of external stakeholders. Moreover, the study identified a significant relationship between internal and external stakeholder engagement and the overall planning processes involved in various programs and projects. Additionally, analysis of stakeholder engagement within Literacy, Numeracy, and Dropout Prevention programs revealed statistically significant differences between the groups. These results underscore the importance of broadening stakeholder participation—particularly in monitoring and evaluation—to enhance the efficacy of school planning and program outcomes.



References:

  1. Aroogh, Manijeh Dehi, Shahboulalghi, Farahnaz Mohammandi, Social Participation of Older Adults: A Concept Analysis Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020 Jan; 8(1): 55–72. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.82222.1055
  2. Bakhshi Moghadam, A. M., Mahmoudi, S., & Hajinejād, A. (2022, June 22). Analysis of factors affecting the success of Agricultural Land Integration Plan (case study: Chubar rural district, Shaft County). Geographical Studies of Coastal Areas Journal. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://hgscaj.guilan.ac.ir/article_5715.html?lang=en
  3. Borg, J., Scott-Young, C. M., & Turner, M. (2019). Smarter Education: Leveraging Stakeholder Inputs to Develop Work Ready Curricula. International Journal of Learning Technology and Educational Research.
  4. Boothroyd, R. I., Flint, A. Y., Lapiz, A. M., Lyons, S., Jarboe, K. L., & Aldridge, W. A. (2017). Active involved community partnerships: Co-creating implementation infrastructure for getting to and sustaining social impact. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0503-3
  5. Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning For Public And Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide To Strengthening And Sustaining Organizational Achievement (5th ed.). Wiley.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  7. Dalangin, Emerson & Arquillo, Jocelyn & Dimaculangan, Ma. Alona. (2020). Encouraging Stakeholders Engagement towards MDL Implementation in the New Normal.
  8. De Torres, Paulina. (2021). Stakeholder’s Involvement to School-Initiated Activities of District I Secondary Schools: Basis for Enhanced Community Partnership Program of Activities. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(2), 481-490.
  9. Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning Of Educational Change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  10. Guanzon, M. E. R. ., & Ancho, I. V. . (2020). A Proposed Action Plan for the Improvement of Students’ School Engagement. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 155–173. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gskkuhs/article/view/245332
  11. Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research And Evaluation In Education And Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, And Mixed Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research (4th ed.). Wiley.
  13. Salmond, S. (2007, January). Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design. Orthopaedic Nursing. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5e4a05473a8bc0a6eba1c9e019ddb450/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=30786
  14. Shanko, Solomon S. Stakeholders’ Contributions and Challenges of School Improvement Program Implementation:  The Case Of Primary Schools. Europian Journal of Education Study. Volume 7. 2020
  15. Sharma, Alpana. Why Stakeholder and Community Engagement in Education is Important. December 21, 2022. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-stakeholder-community-engagement-education-arpana-sharma-fic. Date Retrieved. March 01, 2025
  16. Valencia, Luzviminda G. Extent of Stakeholders’ Involvement in School Programs as Correlate to School Performance:  Basis for an Intervention Program. August 19, 2024
  17. Villarey, Ruby Chezka. Stakeholders Insights in Kasiglahan Village Elementary School. https://www.academia.edu/98694550/Stakeholders_Insights_at_Kasiglahan_Village_Elementary_School. Date Retrieved March 27, 2025