HomePCS Reviewvol. 17 no. 1 (2025)

Monsters we are (should be) afraid of: A documentary review of ‘The Great Hack’

Reyjane Calicdan-del Campo

Discipline: media studies

 

Abstract:

Social media is a transformative technological innovation that has altered the digital culture and practices of its stakeholders. Social media platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and others alike have eternally altered our forms of self-expression, interpersonal communication, and capitalist structures through the rise of platform capitalism. This review of the documentary ‘The Great Hack’ looks into the horrors and unethical processes of the digital industries, such as Facebook. In particular, the paper unpacks Cambridge Analytica’s case and its impact on the digital citizens’ data privacy, unconsented subjection to algorithmic AI profiling and propaganda, and the Philippine election as a supposedly democratic process. The elaboration of the great hack process is juxtaposed with mythological creatures as to how they have evolved in the modern digital world. The digital boogeyman on our black screens through the social media platforms is real, and we allow it to take our precious data. Platform capitalists and disinformation architects, as viscera suckers, suck out the life in us through our attention, time, and critical thinking. Generative Large- Language Model Artificial Intelligence, or GoLLeM AI monsters, curates our digital reality and is used as a perception-wielding instrument for propagandist rhetoric and benefit. The capitalist platform, through its systemic manufacturing of social media consumers’ consent, paves the way for unethical data harvesting, analysis, and processing. Exposing ill practices of capitalist platforms, conscientious social media usage, digital media literacy, and continuous lobbying for data rights on a global scale are some of the possible solutions to the systemic problem of humans and society in the dawn of the AI epoch.



References:

  1. Amer, K. & Noujaim, J (Directors). (2019). The great hack [Film]. Netflix. 
  2. Blanchard, R. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1969). Passive and active reactions to fear-eliciting stimuli. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 68(1), pp.129-135. ttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0027676
  3. Cabato, R. (2023). How to cover malign influence campaigns: A view from the Philippines. 
  4. Thomson Reuters Foundation. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-01/RISJ%20Fellows%20Paper_Regine%20Cabato_HT23_Final.pdf
  5. Center for Humane Technology. (2023, April 6). The A.I. dilemma – March 9, 2023 [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoVJKj8lcNQ 
  6. Dela Peña, K. (2023, February 2). PH social media craze: 77% of Filipinos more engaging online than in real life. Inquirer.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1724608/ph-social-media-craze-77-of-filipinos-more-engaging-online-than-in-real-life
  7. Deuze, M. (2011). Media life. Media, Culture & Society, 33(1), pp. 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710386518
  8. Fallorina, R., Lanuza, J.M.H., Sanchez, J.G., Ong, J.C., & Curato, N. (2023). From disinformation to influence operations: The evolution of disinformation in three electoral cycles. Internews. https://internews.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/InternewsPH-June-2023-The-Evolution-of-Disinformation-in-Three-Electoral-Cycles.pdf
  9. Gamayo, G. V., Bien-Munsayac, J., & Calicdan-Del Campo, R. (2024). Resistance, conformity, and negotiation to socio-cultural anxieties: A semiotic reading of female aswang characters in selected Philippine horror films. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), pp. 447-464. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-25
  10. Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3, pp. 49-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737
  11. Harvard Health Publishing. (2024, April 3). Understanding the stress response: Chronic activation of this survival mechanism impairs health. Harvard Medical School.  https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/understanding-the-stress-response
  12. Howe, S. (2023, April 4). Social media statistics in the Philippines. Meltwater. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/social-media-statistics-philippines
  13. Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch M. (1974). Uses and Gratifications Research. ThePublic Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), pp. 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
  14. Labor, J., Aseo, K. & Reyes, M.T.M. (2022). Cohesion and dissociation framing of labor migration in Philippine presidents’ Labor Day Speeches (1974 to 2016). Humanities Diliman, 19(2), pp. 65-93.
  15. Lopez, V. (2018, April 13). Duterte denies connection to Cambridge Analytica. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/649915/duterte-denies-connection-to-cambridge-analytica/story/
  16. McCallum, S. (2022, December 23). Meta settles Cambridge Analytica scandal case for $725m. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64075067
  17. National Privacy Commission. (n.d.). Republic Act 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012. https://privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/
  18. Occeñola, P. (2019, Septenber 10). Exclusive: PH was Cambridge Analytica’s ‘petri dish’ – whistle-blower Christopher Wylie. Rappler.  https://www.rappler.com/technology/social-media/239606-cambridge-analytica-philippines-online-propaganda-christopher-wylie/
  19. Ong, J.C., Fallorina, R., Lanuza, J.M.H., Sanchez, F., & Curato, N. (2022). Parallel Public Spheres: Influence Operations in the 2022 Philippine Elections. In The Media Manipulation Case Book. Internews and Harvard Kennedy School Shorenstein Center. https://mediamanipulation.org/research/unmasking-influence-operations-in-the-philippines
  20. Ong J. C., & Cabañes J. V. A. (2018). Architects of networked disinformation: Behind the scenes 
  21. of trolls accounts and fake news production in the Philippines. The Newton Techdev Network, 4, p. 74.
  22. Orlowski, J. (Director). (2020). The social dilemma [Film]. Exposure Labs, Argent Pictures, Agent Pictures, and The Space Program. 
  23. Parrocha, A. (2018, April 14). PRRD rejects speculations on Cambridge Analytica’s hand in campaign. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1031976
  24. Ramos, M. D. (1990). The aswang complex in Philippine folklore. Phoenix Pub. House.
  25. Ramos, M. D. (1969). The aswang syncrasy in Philippine folklore. Western Folklore, 28(4), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499218
  26. Ressa, M. (2019, September 25). Opinion: Americans, look to the Philippines to see a dystopian future created by social media. LA Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-09-24/philippines-facebook-cambridge-analytica-duterte-elections
  27. Robles, R. (2018, April 4). How Cambridge Analytica’s parent company helped ‘man of action’ Rodrigo Duterte win the 2016 Philippines election. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/2140303/how-cambridge-analyticas-parent-company-helped-man-action
  28. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.  
  29. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.
  30. Statista. (2023). Number of social media users in the Philippines from 2017 to 2029 (in millions). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/489180/number-of-social-network-users-in-philippines/
  31. Tomacruz, S. (2020, July 15). Bongbong Marcos asked Cambridge Analytica to ‘rebrand’ family image. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/bongbong-marcos-cambridge-analytica-rebrand-family-image/
  32. Webb, M., Dowling, M., & Farina, M. (2021). Understanding mass influence: A case study of 
  33. Cambridge Analytica as a contemporary mass influence campaign. University of Adelaine. https://www.unsw.edu.au/content/dam/pdfs/unsw-canberra/dri/2023-02-research/2023-02-Understanding-Mass-Influence---A-case-study-of-Cambridge-Analytica.pdf