Home⇛PCS Review⇛vol. 17 no. 1 (2025)

Pagtagpo at Paglayo: Pagsusuri sa HistorikalPantaseryeng Maria Clara at Ibarra Gamit Bilang Lente ang Teorya ng Akomodasyon ni Howard Giles

Erdy Freian P. Falcutila

Discipline: media studies

 

Abstract:

Ang pag-aaral na ito ay naglalayong suriin ang dinamiko ng komunikasyon sa historikal-pantaseryeng Maria Clara at Ibarra gamit bilang lente ang Communication Accommodation Theory ni Howard Giles na nakatuon sa dalawang pangunahing estratehiya: ang convergence (pagtagpo); at divergence (paglayo). Sa pamamagitan ng pagsusuri sa nilalaman at diskurso sa 91 na piling eksena mula sa kabuuang 105 na episodyo ng serye, tinukoy ng mananaliksik kung paano iniaangkop ng mga tauhan ang kanilang komunikasyon batay sa wika, layunin, at identidad ng kausap. Natukoy sa pag-aaral na mas nangingibabaw ang paggamit ng estratehiyang paglayo (58 na eksena) kaysa sa pagtagpo (33 na eksena). Lumitaw ding nangyayari ang cognitive motives upang linawin o pahirapin ang ugnayan, habang ang affective motives ay nangyayari sa mga eksenang naghahangad ng pakikipagkaisa o emosyonal na koneksyon. Ipinakikita ng resulta na ang Maria Clara at Ibarra ay hindi lamang representasyon ng kasaysayan, kundi espasyo kung saan ang wika ay ginagamit upang itaguyod, igiit, o isantabi ang identidad at pananaw. Ang pag-aaral ay nag-aambag sa larangan ng sosyolinggwistika sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay-diin sa papel ng komunikasyon sa midya bilang salamin ng ugnayang panlipunan.



References:

  1. Bilyonaryo.com. (2022, October 24). _Maria Clara and Ibarra inspires young viewers to read Noli Me Tangere.Bilyonaryo. https://bilyonaryo.com/2022/10/24/maria-clara-and-ibarra-inspires-young-viewers-to-read-noli-me-tangere/
  2. Bustamante, R. A., & Villanueva, E. R. (2024). Intertextual synergy: Traversing the controversies of the Maria Clara at Ibarra, a film adaptation of Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(4), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber
  3. Cote, P., & Clement, R. (1994). “Language attitudes: An interactive situated approach.”Language and Communication, Vol. 14, (3), pp. 237-251.,doi:10.1016/0271-5309(94)90002-7
  4. Demeterio, F. A., & Dreisbach, J. L. (2017) Disentangling the Rubrico and Dolalas Hypotheses on the Davao Filipino Language. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, volume 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1705.02.01
  5. Dragojevic, M. J., & Howard, G. (2016) Accommodative Strategies as Core of the Theory in Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across context, edited by H. Giles. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Dragojevic, M. J., & Howard, G. (2015) Communication Accommodation Theory. in The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, pp. 1-21., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  7. Dreisbach, J. L. (2020). Ang teorya ng akomodasyon sa komunikasyon bilang batayang kaisipan sa pag-aaral ng multilingguwal at multikultural na araling Filipino. DALUMAT, 6 (1), p. 2. Networked Learning Ph, Inc.
  8. Dumanig, F. P., David, M. K., & Shanmuganathan, T. (2013). Language choice and language policies in Filipino-Malaysian families in multilingual Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(6), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.784323
  9. Gallois, C., & Howard, G. (2015). Communication accommodation theory. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction. John Wiley & Sons,Inc.
  10. Giles, H. (1973) Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics,15, p.87-105
  11. Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). The context of accommodation: Dimensions in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. Explain communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars, pp. 293-310. Mahwah
  13. Giles, H., Scherer, K. R., & Taylor, D. M. (1979). Speech markers in social interaction. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech, pp. 343-381. Cambridge University Press
  14. Holmes, J. N., & Wilson. (2017). An introduction to sociolinguistics. 5 Ed. Routledge,Taylor and Francis Group.
  15. Hunt, R., Marland, J., & Rawle, S. (2010). Basics film making: The language of film. AVA Publishing SA. https://www.scribd.com/doc/169818858/Robert-Edgar-Hunt-John- Marland-Steven-Rawle-Ba-Bookos-org
  16. Iglesias, I. (2022, Oct 03). 'Maria Clara at Ibarra' -- A modern retelling of history.TCA Regional News.https://www.proquest.com/wire-feeds/maria-clara-at-ibarra-modern-retelling-history/docview/2721345190/se-2
  17. Llemit, K. A., (2023, December 21) ‘Maria Clara at Ibarra’ most-viewed series, garners 22M total viewing hours. Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/
  18. Mackie, N. (2018). Communication partner training in aphasia: Reflections on communication accommodation theory. Aphasiology, 32(10), 1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1428282
  19. 'Maria Clara at Ibarra at Klay'. (2022/11/28/, 2022 Nov 28). Business Mirror https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/maria-clara-at-ibarra-klay/docview/2740389192/se-2
  20. Mazer, J. P., & Hunt, S. K. (2008). “Cool” communication in the classroom: A preliminary examination of students' perceptions of instructor use of positive slang. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 9 (1), 20-28
  21. Mia, Ron. “How Did ‘Maria Clara at Ibarra’S’ Finale Week Fare in TV Ratings?” LionhearTV, 1 Mar. 2023, www.lionheartv.net/2023/03/maria-clara-at-ibarra-finale-week-tv-ratings.
  22. Nabila, A. R., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2020). Teacher’s Motive in Applying Communication Accommodation Strategies in Secondary ELT Class. Linguistics, English Education and Art Journal, volume 3 (2) https://doi.org/10.31539/leea/v3i2.1248
  23. PEP.ph. (2022, December 24). Maria Clara at Ibarra: Why viewers, young and old alike, love the GMA drama. PEP.ph. https://www.pep.ph/news/local/170101/maria-clara-at-ibarra-a755-20221224-lfrm3
  24. Putra, I. M. C. A., & Yusra, K. (2025, March). Forms of accommodation in 8 Mile movie:How the characters implement Communication Accommodation Theory as an affective function. Education Quarterly Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.08.01.569
  25. Ramtally, R. (2014). Communication accommodation theory and the Mughal-E-Azamfilm: An analytical perspective. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19(4), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19441923
  26. Sand, N. T. (2012). Communication Accommodation in Context: An Analysis of Convergence and Divergence in Action. In North Dakota State University.
  27. Soliz, J. (2015). “Convergence/Divergence.” in The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, pp. 1-5., doi:10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic082
  28. Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). The psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory, in C. Fraser and K. R Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language, pp. 205-255. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Tumacder, J. C. G., & Ramos, M. J. T. (2023). Salamisim: Sipat-suri sa adaptasyong teleseryeng Maria Clara at Ibarra batay sa nobelang Noli Me Tangere sa lente ng seksismo. Sibugay Research Journal, 1(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.62705/srj01010523
  30. Usera, D., & contributing authors. (n.d.). 4.03: Communication Accommodation Theory.In Communicating to Connect: Interpersonal Communication for Today. LibreTexts. Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://socialsci.libretexts.org
  31. Wang, N. (2022, October 2). Whimsical TV series reimagines Maria Clara and Ibarra’s romance. Manila Standard. https://manilastandard.net/showbitz/314265114/whimsical-tv-series-reimagines-maria-clara-and-ibarras-romance.html
  32. Zhang, Y. B., & Howard, G. (2017). Communication Accommodation Theory in The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, edited by Y. Y. Kim and K.L. McKay-Semmler. Wiley Online Library

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic