HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 46 no. 8 (2025)

Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Model: Students' Mathematics Performance and Collaborative Skills

Necris Tiedra | Hermae Joyce Toraja

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Mathematics achievement and collaboration skills are critical for student success; however, many secondary learners struggle to develop these competencies through traditional methods alone. The Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Model (GRRIM) aims to enhance academic performance and foster collaborative learning by progressively shifting responsibility from the teacher to the student. This study aimed to assess the impact of GRRIM on the performance of Grade 9 students in mathematics and collaboration, and to propose an action plan for incorporating peer tutoring alongside conventional teaching techniques. A quantitative descriptive design was employed, using a self-administered survey questionnaire to measure GRR's effects. Pretest and posttest data from the control and experimental groups revealed that, prior to the intervention, most students exhibited developing collaboration skills, with few demonstrating established skills. Following the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated a higher mean gain in collaboration skills (3.38) compared to the control group (3.27). In mathematics achievement, both groups initially performed at poor to average levels; post-intervention, gains were recorded for both groups, with the control group showing a mean gain of 7.30 and the experimental group 5.71. Statistical analysis confirmed no significant differences in pretest performance (p = 0.62) and pretest collaboration (p = 0.36), indicating initial comparability. For collaboration, experimental (p = 0.13) and control (p = 0.10) groups had p-values greater than 0.05, indicating no significant difference before and after the intervention. In mathematics performance, both groups showed significant differences between pretest and posttest scores (p = 0.00), leading to rejection of the null hypothesis. However, posttest performance (p = 0.46) and posttest collaboration (p = 0.37) indicated no significant difference between groups after the study. Findings suggest that GRRIM and traditional lecture methods improve mathematics performance and collaboration skills. An action plan was proposed to integrate peer tutoring with traditional teaching to promote achievement and collaborative learning further.



References:

  1. Alessandri G, Zuffianò A, & Perinelli E (2017). Evaluating Intervention Programs with a Pretest-Posttest Design: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00223
  2. Aporbo, R. J. (2023). Impact of Cooperative LearningStrategy on Students' Academic Productivity. Journalof Student and Education, 1 (1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.54536/jse.v1i1.1506 
  3. Becker, J. R., & Assali, M. (2021). Effectiveness of the Gradual Release Methodology in Teaching Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills to High-     and Low-Achieving Students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-16.
  4. Calder, N., Jafri, M., & Guo, L. (2021). Mathematics Education Students' Experiences during Lockdown:Managing Collaboration in eLearning. Education Sciences, 11(4), 191.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci110401917  
  5. Capili, B., & Anastasi, J. K. (2024). An Introduction to Types of Quasi-Experimental Designs. The American journal of nursing, 124(11), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001081740.74815.20
  6. Casas, A. L., Casas, M., Evardo, O. J., & Abina, I. L. (2023). Integration of Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Model (GRRIM) in the development of learning module in Geometry. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 1(2), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v1i2.1778
  7. Caviedes, S., de Gamboa, G., & Badillo, E. (2023). Preservice teachers' knowledge mobilized in solving area tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp35-54
  8. Colomer, J., Serra, T., Cañabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective Learning in Higher Education: ActiveMethodologies for Transformative Practices. Sustainability, 12(9), 3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su120938278  
  9. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  10. Fuentes, A. G., & Casinillo, L. (2024). Assessing the Effect of the Gradual Release ofResponsibility (GRR) Model in Teaching Science. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol14.1.2.202 
  11. Gray JGS (2023). Burns & Groves The Practice of Nursig Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
  12. Mathias, J., Saville, C., & Leech, S. (2023). Engaging non-mathematics students in mathematics learningthrough collaborative teaching. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications.26. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrad00327  
  13. MATHTED, S.-D. &. (2011). Mathematics framework for Philippine basic education. Manila: SEI-DOST&MATHTED.
  14. OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
  15. PeÅ„eda, Fabiana P.  (2023). An Exploration of Collaborative Learning Strategy in Mathematics: A Psychological Case Study. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(9s), 436–443. Retrieved from https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1050
  16. Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The Instruction of Reading Comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
  17. Republic Act No. 10533, An Act Enhancing the Philippine Basic Education System (2013). Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  18. Salehomoum, M., Revelle, K., Duke, N., & Pearson, P.D. (2022). Gradual release of responsibilityinstructional model. Routledge Resources Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE226-1 
  19. Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students' mathematical problem-solving ability based onteaching models intervention and cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222
  20. Starke, K. (2021, May 17). Graduate Programs for Educators. Retrieved from graduate program.org: https://www.graduateprogram.org  
  21. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Sociocultural Theory.       
  22. Zemanova, M. A., & Knight, A. (2021). The educational efficacy of humane teaching methods: a systematicreview of the evidence. Animals, 11(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010114