Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 1 (2026)

The Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Graduate Seminar Coursework and Ethical Preparedness: Insights from the Graduate Students

Artemio L. Florendo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Given the lack of national and institutional Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance frameworks, the governance and education of AI in Philippine higher education often rest with faculty. This makes course-level integration a productive starting point. This pilot study examined how graduate students develop ethical preparedness for AI, arguing that the relationship between such preparedness and their exposure to AI ethics instruction is mediated through operational literacy on AI. A mixed-methods intervention was conducted with 39 graduate students enrolled in the Master of Arts Major in Educational Management, who participated in a 20-hour AI literacy and ethics course embedded in a Graduate Seminar. To capture the Philippine education realities often overlooked in global frameworks, a researcher-developed questionnaire was employed to reconceptualize and measure AI literacy and ethical preparedness in the local context. Quantitative results showed significant improvements, with Artificial Intelligence literacy mediating the relationship between ethical preparedness and artificial intelligence literacy (β = .46, p < .001). Qualitative insights through classroom observations illustrated how students translated abstract principles into situated judgment. This paper extends AI ethics discourse by reframing it not only as a matter of principles but also as a function of operational literacies that enable educators to exercise situated ethical judgment, especially within local contexts.



References:

  1. Daher, R. (2025). Integrating AI literacy into teacher education: A critical perspective paper. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00475-7
  2. Espinosa, A., Gomez, M.A., Miranda, P., David, A., Abulon, E.L., Hermosisima, M.V., Quinosa, E., Jr., Soliman, A., de Vera, J., Claros, I.H., Cruz, H.G., & Gonzales, N. (2025). Bridging a digital divide: A critical analysis of contextual factors affecting ICT integration in Philippine schools. Issues in Educational Research, 35(2): 526–549. http://www.iier.org.au/iier35/espinosa-2.pdf
  3. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
  4. Frieary, A. (2025). The integration of Artificial Intelligence into curriculum design in higher education (Applied Research Project). Purdue Global. https://purdueglobal.dspacedirect.org
  5. Garrett, N., Beard, N., & Fiesler, C. (2020, February). More than “If Time Allows”: The role of ethics in AI education. AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. https://cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/AIES_EthicsEducation.pdf
  6. Matthews, A.S., & Bartley, B. (2025). Pay attention to the chatbot behind the curtain when AI ‘is no place like home’: A framework and toolkit for integrating critical thinking and information literacy in educational and professional settings. Advances in Online Education, 3(3):247–273. https://doi.org/10.69554/FMAI7138
  7. Ng, D.T.K., Leung, J.K.L., Chu, K.W.S., & Qiao, M.S. (2022). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1): 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487
  8. Ning, Y., Zhang, W., Yao, D., Fang, B., Xu, B., & Wijaya, T.T. (2025). Development and validation of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale for Teachers (AILST). Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13347-5
  9. Noor, E., & Kanitroj, B. (2025). Speaking in code: Contextualizing large language models in Southeast Asia. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://shorturl.at/cDM4d
  10. Okoye, K., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Wilcoxon statistics in R: Signed-Rank Test and Rank-Sum Test. In: R Programming. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3385-9_13
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). AI and the future of skills, volume 1: Capabilities and assessments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5ee71f34-en
  12. Showemimo, P. (2025). The AI paradox in academia: When writing too well raises red flags. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5255976
  13. Sperling, K., Stenliden, L., Mannila, L., Hallström, J., Nordlöf, C., & Heintz, F. (2025). Perspectives on AI literacy in middle school classrooms: An integrative review.  Postdigital Science and Education, 7: 719–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00560-1
  14. Taber, K. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48: 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  15. University of the Philippines. (2023). University of the Philippines principles for responsible and trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. https://tinyurl.com/mpz4sdjd
  16. Villanueva, M. (2025). Towards national standards: Comparative analysis of AI governance models in Philippine higher education. Ignatian Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15212683
  17. Wang, R., Li, J., Shi, W., & Li, X. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence techniques in operating mode of professors' academic governance in American research universities. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3415125

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic