HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 45 no. 9 (2025)

Exploring the Lived Experiences of Students Affected by Grammar Policing: A Phenomenological Inquiry

Mayleen Tresbe

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

In the context of language learning and everyday communication, the phenomenon of "Grammar Policing"—when others harshly correct someone due to grammatical errors—has led to various psychological and social effects, specifically on students. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of senior high school students who have been targets of such linguistic criticism because of their English language skills. Understanding their experiences can offer insight into the cognitive, emotional, and social impacts of linguistic judgment. This qualitative study employed a descriptive phenomenological design to examine the experiences, challenges, and coping mechanisms of six (6) senior high school students from Bambad National High School during the school year 2023–2024. Participants were selected and engaged in semi-structured interviews. Colaizzi's (1978) Method of Analysis was used to extract significant themes from the narratives. The analysis yielded eight (8) emergent themes that uncover the participants' experiences from grammar policing: Acts of Linguistic Criticism, Preclusion of Social Conflicts, Uncontrollable Psychological Consequences, Indisputable Benefits, Acts of Acceptance, Irresistible Social Denials, Undeniable Effusive Responses, and Acts of Adaptability. These experiences reflect the inevitable impacts of linguistic criticism on students' communication behavior and self-perception. The findings suggest that encounters with grammar policing significantly affect students across cognitive, affective, and social domains. While some students perceived constructive feedback as beneficial, others experienced emotional distress, social withdrawal, or adapted defensively. These outcomes underscore the need for more empathetic and culturally aware approaches to language correction within educational and social contexts. To mitigate the negative effects of language criticism, the study recommends the implementation of school-based programs that raise awareness on sociolinguistics, provide appropriate language feedback, and promote respectful communication practices. Such initiatives can empower students to navigate language criticism constructively and build resilience in linguistically diverse environments.



References:

  1. Adamson, L. (2022). Fear and shame: Students’ experiences in English-medium secondary classrooms in Tanzania. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2093357
  2. Amin, N., Rahman, N., Sharipudin, M., & Bakar, M. (2016). The practice of “grammar naziness” on Facebook in relation to generating grammar learning: A motivation or demotivation in updating statuses in English on Facebook. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(6), 201–207. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134677.pdf
  3. Baladjay, M., et al. (2014). The thoughts of AB English freshman students that they are perceived as a Grammar Nazi: Its impact on their confidence and benefits [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Institution unknown.
  4. Betti, M. (2022). English grammar. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27956.94086
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson. http://www.pearsonhighered.com
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research method [PDF]. Precision Consulting. https://precisionconsultingcompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Sample-of-a-Qualitative-Methodology-Section-1.pdf
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research method [PDF]. Precision Consulting. https://precisionconsultingcompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Sample-of-a-Qualitative-Methodology-Section-1.pdf
  8. Eberly Center. (n.d.). Students may be intimidated by writing and lack of confidence in their abilities. Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/solveproblem/strat-cantwrite/cantwrite-05.html
  9. Fitriani, R., & Iftanti, E. (2021). EFL learners’ perception of grammar Nazis practice on social media Twitter. Language Sphere, 13(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2021.13.1.143-163
  10. Hingco, J. A. (2019). Are we all grammar Nazi? An analysis of oral feedback on the grammatical lapses of students in an English class. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/44913089
  11. Islam, S., & Stapa, M. (2021). Students’ low proficiency in spoken English in private universities in Bangladesh: Reasons and remedies. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0
  12. Jumanto, J., & Soehendro, E. (2022). The analysis of impoliteness within Grammar Nazi context in Twitter tweets. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i1.73-92
  13. Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
  14. Leano, A., Rabi, N., & Piragasam, G. (2019). Speaking difficulties of Philippine indigenous learners in English semantics. International Journal of English and Education, 8(4), 75–83. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239659.pdf
  15. Nabavi, R. T., & Bijandi, M. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory and social cognitive learning theory. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267750204
  16. Phuong, W. (2021). Difficulties in studying writing of English-majored sophomores at a university in Vietnam. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(11), 152–161. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/3962
  17. Soehendro, E., Septiani, I., Zhafarina, Z., & Jumanto, J. (2021). Grammar-Nazi analysis in English learning process among millennials in Indonesia. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358987994
  18. Schutz, R. (1998). Stephen Krashen’s theory of second language acquisition. English Made in Brazil. https://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash-english.html
  19. Tatman, R. (2016, February 8). The problem with the grammar police. Making Noise and Hearing Things. https://makingnoiseandhearingthings.com/2016/02/08/the-problem-with-the-grammar-police/
  20. Tridinanti, G. (2018). The correlation between speaking anxiety, self-confidence, and speaking achievement of undergraduate EFL students of a private university in Palembang. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(1), 23–30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1201652.pdf.
  21. Watson, J. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1987). Behavioral learning theory. https://courses.aiu.edu/THEORIES%20OF%20LEARNING/2/2.pdf