Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 5 (2025)

Adaptation to Curriculum Revisions: A Phenomenological Study

Earlie Theresa Pangan | Hyacinth Belches | Edroslyn J. Fernandez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Curriculum reforms play a vital role in enhancing educational quality, but their success heavily depends on teachers' ability to adapt. In the Philippines, junior high school teachers face persistent challenges in implementing revised curricula, such as limited training, inadequate resources, and unclear policy directives. Guided by Adaptational Theory, this study explored how teachers personally and professionally adjust to these changes. Specifically, it examined their lived experiences related to shifting perceptions, teaching practices, emotional responses, and support systems. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, the study gathered data through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with six purposively selected junior high school teachers from public secondary schools in Davao City. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key patterns in their experiences. Findings revealed that teachers proactively adapted by engaging in self-directed learning, incorporating technology, and embracing learner-centered strategies. Despite encountering constraints such as scarce materials and a lack of formal training, they displayed flexibility in managing schedules and modifying instruction. Emotional challenges, including stress and uncertainty, were common yet often balanced by peer collaboration and a strong sense of professional duty. The study highlights the resilience and adaptability of teachers in the face of ongoing curriculum reforms. It also emphasizes the urgent need for sustained professional development, more transparent communication from policymakers, and stronger support systems to ensure effective implementation and to safeguard teacher wellbeing.



References:

  1. Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (4th ed., pp. 492–505). Jossey-Bass.
  2. Agormedah, E. K., Adu, E. O., Ankomah, F., & Akyeampong, A. (2022). Teachers’ self-efficacy and curriculum reform engagement: A Ghanaian perspective. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijer.2022.xxxx
  3. Al-Yateem, N. (2016). The effect of interview recording on quality of data obtained: A methodological reflection. Nurse Researcher, 23(4), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.23.4.33.s5
  4. Ambreen, S., & Arif, M. (2020). Self-directed learning and teacher adaptability in changing educational contexts. Journal of Educational Development, 35(2), 123–135.
  5. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  6. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology. (2022). Teacher education for adaptability: Preparing educators for curriculum change. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 10(2), 45–58.
  7. Avalos, B., & Amador, J. M. (2021). Teachers’ emotional responses to curriculum reforms: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103389
  8. Balta, E., & Duran, M. (2022). The effect of project-based learning on students’ communication skills and academic achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 22(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2022.1.005
  9. Bongco, R. T. & David, A. P. (2020). Filipino teachers’ experiences as curriculum policy implementers in the evolving K to 12 landscape. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 19-34. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/bongco.pdf
  10. Bongco, R. T., & De Guzman, D. M. (2022). Teachers adapting to curricular change: Basis for teacher education curriculum review. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 1(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/37588
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Bresler, L., & Stake, R. E. (2023). Teachers navigating uncertainty: Emotional responses to curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2139824
  13. Brown, L., & Nguyen, M. (2023). Infrastructure challenges and their impact on instructional delivery. Journal of Education and Development, 14(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jed.2023.xxxx
  14. Bubb, S., & Jones, M.-A. (2021). Supporting teachers in times of change: The role of collaboration and shared leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220937315
  15. Callista Roy. (2020). The Roy Adaptation Model. Prentice Hall.
  16. Casimiro, L. A., Atrido, M. D., & Calahat, R. B. (2023). Teacher adaptability to curriculum reforms in the Philippines: Challenges and coping strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Allied Health Sciences, 6(1). Retrieved from https://colab.ws/articles/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101134
  17. Casimiro, M., Atrido, J., & Calahat, L. (2023). Challenges in curriculum implementation among public school teachers. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 35–46.
  18. Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Differentiated Instruction. Stanford University. https://ctl.stanford.edu/differentiated-instruction
  19. Cheung, R. Y. M., & Leung, C. H. (2021). Teachers’ emotional wellbeing and job satisfaction: The protective role of family support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103432
  20. Chin, J.M.-C.; Ching, G.S.; del Castillo, F.;Wen, T.-H.; Huang, Y.-C.; del Castillo, C.D.; Gungon, J.L.; Trajera, S.M. Perspectives on the Barriers to and Needs of Teachers’ Professional Development in the Philippines during COVID-19. Sustainability 2022, 14, 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010470
  21. Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 2332858420986187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187
  22. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
  23. Cruz, M. L., Santos, J. R., & Feliciano, A. G. (2022). Communication and training needs during curriculum transitions. Curriculum Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/csq.2022.xxxx
  24. Dabbagh, N., Fake, H., & Zhang, M. (2020). Authentic learning activities in online course design: A design-based research study. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100731
  25. Datu, J. A. D., & Park, N. (2023). Does school kindness lead to greater school engagement? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence in the Philippine context. Journal of Positive Psychology, 19(6), 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2297200
  26. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). Teacher resilience: Managing emotional challenges of teaching and change. Teachers and Teaching, 26(5-6), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1822638
  27. De Jesus, M. R., & Franco, M. C. (2023). Teacher Experiences During the Implementation of the Revised K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education and Development, 48(2), 89–102.
  28. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Dolev, N., & Leshem, S. (2020). Teachers’ emotional resilience in response to curriculum change. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09352-3
  30. Donnelly, D. (2020). The impact of curriculum overload on student learning outcomes in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 1–18.
  31. Doyle, L., & McDowall, A. (2022). Boundary management and teacher wellbeing: Strategies to reduce burnout in education. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09611-3
  32. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T., & Mattos, M. (2020). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
  33. Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2022). Principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ work engagement: The mediating role of teacher collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2021-0014
  34. Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
  35. Fitria, T. N., & Nurani, L. M. (2021). The use of multimedia in teaching and learning process to improve students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.5.1.99-112
  36. Frianeza, M. M., Mabunga, R. P., & Lontoc, M. A. (2023). Systemic challenges in Philippine education: Policy inconsistencies and infrastructure limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(45), 1–20.
  37. Fullan, M. (2020). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press. This seminal work by Michael Fullan explores the complexities of educational reform and offers insights into effective change strategies. TC Press
  38. Garcia, M. J. (2020). Barriers to professional development: Teacher perspectives in reform contexts. Educational Leadership Review, 8(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/elr.2020.xxxx
  39. Garcia, M. J., & Kim, H. (2021). Professional commitment and adaptation to educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103258. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tate.2021.xxxx
  40. Garcia, M. J., & Mendoza, R. (2020). Educator resilience during systemic educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jec.2020.xxxx
  41. Garcia, L., & Patel, R. (2022). Resourcefulness and resilience in teaching: Overcoming material scarcity. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 456–470.
  42. Gardner, K., Glassmeyer, D. M., & Worthy, R. (2019). Impacts of STEM professional development on teachers’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00026  
  43. Gonzalez, L., & Ramirez, D. (2023). Teacher motivation and punitive evaluation systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31, 17. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/epaa.2023.xxxx
  44. Greenier, V., Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2021). Teacher emotional regulation and burnout: Mediating effects of resilience and wellbeing. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820977834
  45. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  46. Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2020). A structural model of critical thinking, self-regulation, and academic achievement: The mediating role of metacognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100731
  47. Giorgi, A. (2009). The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Duquesne University Press. https://www.dupress.duq.edu/products/the-descriptive-phenomenological-method-in-psychology
  48. Han, S., & Ellis, R. (2020). Student engagement in learner-centered classrooms: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000395
  49. Harfitt, G. J. (2022). Emotional resilience and teacher identity in times of educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103581
  50. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  51. Hoban, G., & Hoban, J. (2020). Teacher professional development and curriculum implementation: A review of effective strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103062.
  52. Ignacio, M., Cristobal, S., & David, H. (2023). Infrastructural and policy challenges in Philippine education reforms. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Policy, 14(2), 88–101.
  53. Insorio, A. O. (2024). Addressing Student Diversity to Improve Mathematics Achievement through Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 6(1), ep2406. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/14462
  54. Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method—Interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
  55. Johnson, M., & Lam, C. (2020). Facilitating student-centered learning: Teacher roles in inquiry-based classrooms. Educational Practice and Theory, 42(1), 23–39.
  56. Johnson, S., Cooper, C., Cartwright, S., Donald, I., Taylor, P., & Millet, C. (2021). Managing stress and work-life balance in teachers during educational reform: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2020-0208
  57. Jones, A., & Brown, P. (2020). Self-directed learning and professional growth among educators. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(3), 210–228.
  58. Kaur, A., & Noman, M. (2020). Investigating lesson planning practices: A case study of Malaysian secondary school teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(4), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1732740
  59. Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). ‘Like a rug had been pulled from under you’: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers’ mental health and coping strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12381
  60. Kim, S., & Asbury, K. (2020). Occupational stress and coping strategies among teachers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(3), 168–182.
  61. Knowles, M. S. (2020). The Adult Learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge.
  62. Lee, C., Trinkle, B., & Kim, H. (2021). Active learning strategies in STEM education: Effects on student engagement and learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00290-9
  63. Lee, S., Park, Y., & Chen, L. (2022). Teacher stress under high-stakes evaluations and curriculum reform. Educational Research and Evaluation, 28(1–2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ere.2022.xxxx
  64. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book8422
  65. Lopez, J. R., & Rivera, P. M. (2023). The critical role of training and support in education reform. Professional Development in Education, 49(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/pde.2023.xxxx
  66. Lopez, M., & Smith, J. (2021). Positive coping strategies and teacher wellbeing: Managing workload and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 921–935.
  67. Magallanes, K., Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2022). The Philippine teachers’ concerns on educational reform using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 763991. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.763991
  68. Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., Lim, S. A. H., & Yusof, A. (2017). Piloting for interviews in qualitative research: Operationalization and lessons learned. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2916
  69. Martín-Sómer, M., Moreira, J. A., & Casado-Muñoz, R. (2021). Use of multimedia tools to support learning: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10254-3
  70. Martinez, J. F., & Johnson, R. T. (2023). Continuous learning and teacher adaptation in reform environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103647. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tate.2023.xxxx
  71. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  72. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/phenomenological-research-methods/book9410
  73. Ngussa, B. M., & Makewa, L. N. (2022). Instructional planning practices and teachers’ effectiveness in secondary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15210a
  74. Nguyen, T., Garcia, M., & Patel, S. (2023). Innovative teaching practices in resource-constrained environments. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 12(2), 99–115.
  75. Nguyen, T., Lee, S., & Torres, A. (2022). Curriculum reforms and teacher workload: Challenges and implications. Teaching and Curriculum Studies, 14(1), 45–63.
  76. Nguyen, T., & Smith, K. (2020). Teaching passion, resilience, and job satisfaction: A correlational study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/apjte.2020.xxxx
  77. Nworie, J. (2021). Competency-based education: Implications for instructional planning and delivery. TechTrends, 65, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00619-5
  78. Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum, foundations, principles, and issues. 7th ed. Singapore: Pearson.
  79. Owen, S. (2021). Professional learning communities: Engaging teacher collaboration for school improvement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.3
  80. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  81. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
  82. Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., Correa, V. I., & Langley, L. (2020). Teacher collaboration in inclusive classrooms: A model of co-inquiry for teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103044
  83. Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/framework-education-response-covid-19-pandemic/
  84. Rodriguez, M., & Garcia, L. (2021). Enhancing teacher adaptability through professional development: A policy perspective. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 12(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEP-09-2020-0272
  85. Salazar, R. R., & Gumanoy, R. M. (2025). Differentiated Learning Activities: Effects on Students’ Motivation and Involvement in Teaching Mathematics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 1707–1714. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0131
  86. Schlossberg, N. K. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100008100900202
  87. Scholkmann, A. (2020). Conditions for successful curriculum reform and implementation: The role of teachers’ collaborative networks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(3), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1734668
  88. Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  89. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher engagement and burnout: A study of the role of motivation and job resources. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103038
  90. Smith, L., & Lee, K. (2021). Impact of limited resources on instructional quality. Education Research Review, 19(3), 87–102.
  91. Smith, L., & Torres, J. (2022). Professional development for curriculum changes: A teacher’s perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(4), 411–427.
  92. Sweeney, P. J., & Myers, S. M. (2015). Adaptational theory: Understanding individual responses to change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1991
  93. Tan, J., & Lim, C. (2021). Project-based learning and student engagement in junior high schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 68–83.
  94. Taş, H., & Minaz, M. B. (2024). The Effects of Learning Style-Based Differentiated Instructional Activities on Academic Achievement and Learning Retention in the Social Studies Course. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249290
  95. The Guardian. (2024, April 10). Polish curriculum reform faces criticism over political bias and content removal. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/10/polish-curriculum-reform-faces-criticism-over-political-bias-and-content-removal/
  96. The Guardian. (n.d.). Australia’s crowded curriculum linked to declining PISA performance. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/15/australias-crowded-curriculum-linked-to-declining-pisa-performance/
  97. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in using technology for student-centered learning? A critical review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103190
  98. Usta, E., & Aydın, B. (2022). Digital assessment in the age of personalized learning: An integrative review. Computers & Education, 190, 104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104610
  99. Van der Want, A. C., Meirink, J. A., & Admiraal, W. F. (2019). Understanding teacher collaboration in secondary schools: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 27, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100289
  100. Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 102970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102970
  101. Vilches, M. L. (2018). Involving teachers in the change process: One English language teacher’s account of implementing curricular change in Philippine basic education. In M. Wedell & L. Grassick, International perspectives on teachers living with curriculum change (pp.15-37). UK. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-54309-7_2
  102. Voss, T., & Wittwer, J. (2021). Teachers’ instructional quality and professional wellbeing in times of change: Investigating the interplay. Educational Psychology, 41(8), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1929437
  103. Wahyuni, S., Agustina, Z., & Wulandari, F. (2022). The effectiveness of Kahoot! as a media for teaching vocabulary: A case study in Indonesian classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.14
  104. Wang, C., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2019). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.004
  105. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2019). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
  106. Yıldırım, İ. (2020). The role of social support and stress in the life satisfaction of teachers. Current Psychology, 39(3), 896–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9806-5

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic