HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 45 no. 5 (2025)

Using Project PROX (Promoting Reading and Oral Expression) to Develop Reading Fluency and Communication Competence in Grade 6 English Learners

Arnel Llorca

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This mixed-method action research examined the implementation of Project PROX (Promoting Reading and Oral eXpression) to enhance reading comprehension and oral communication skills among Grade 6 learners at a public elementary school in Laguna. Forty-five learners from Section 6-Rizal were selected through convenience sampling due to their low English performance in previous assessments. The study employed a convergent parallel design, collecting quantitative data through pre- and post-tests, and qualitative data via teacher observations, parent surveys, and student interviews. The intervention integrated storytelling and group presentations to foster an interactive and collaborative learning environment. Quantitative results revealed a 67% improvement in reading comprehension and a 60% increase in oral communication proficiency following the intervention. Qualitative findings supported these results, highlighting noticeable gains in student confidence, participation, and enthusiasm for reading and speaking activities. The integration of both data sets demonstrated that active, student-centered approaches significantly contributed to literacy and oral language development. The study concludes that employing creative and interactive strategies can effectively address learning gaps in English and cultivate a more engaging classroom experience. The findings suggest the importance of fostering student expression and critical thinking as part of everyday instruction. Project PROX offers promising implications for broader application, encouraging the use of similar interventions across subjects to reinforce communication competencies.



References:

  1. Agwu, U. D., & Nmadu, J. (2023). Students’ interactive engagement, academic achievement and self concept in chemistry: An evaluation of cooperative learning pedagogy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 688-705.DOI: 10.1039/D2RP00148A
  2. Ahmad, C. V. (2024). Causes of students’ reluctance to participate in classroom discussions. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104159
  3. Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2024). The role of presentation-based activities in enhancing speaking proficiency among Saudi EFL students: A quasi-experimental study. Acta Psychologica, 243, 104159.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104159
  4. Chi, C. (2024). Explainer: With students’ poor literacy, are all teachers now ‘reading teachers’? Philstar Global. Retrieved from: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/01/11/2325063/explainer-students-poor-literacy-are-all-teachers-now-reading-teachers
  5. Chi, C. (2023). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022
  6. Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021, July). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 6, p. 678692). Frontiers Media SA.  https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692
  7. Javed, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Different Teaching Methods in Education: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Social Signs Review, 1(1), 17-24. Retrieved from: https://socialsignsreivew.com/index.php/12/article/view/3
  8. Prudente, M. S., & Velasco, A. P. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on Education Workers and Union Responses. Center for Integrative and Development Studies, University of the Philippines. https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Education-Workers-and-Union-Responses.pdf
  9. Rubin, N. T., & Travero, A. S. (2022). Fostering reading level and story comprehension through MARITES (Marungko Approach Reading Intervention to Elementary Schoolers) With mentor-mentee arrangement. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(3), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7136494
  10. Santosa, A., Ginting, D. and Yulianto, W. (2023). The effects of storytelling teaching style on elementary students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Educational Study, 6(2), 131-141. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375689451_THE_EFFECTS_OF_STORYTELLING_TEACHING_STYLE_ON_ELEMENTARY_STUDENTS'_READING_COMPREHENSION
  11. Sari, G. I., Winasis, S., Pratiwi, I., & Nuryanto, U. W. (2024). Strengthening digital literacy in Indonesia: Collaboration, innovation, and sustainability education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101100
  12. UNESCO. (2023, April 18). 617 million children and adolescents are not learning worldwide. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/617-million-children-and-adolescents-not-getting-minimum-reading-and-math
  13. Wang, W., Rezaei, Y. M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). Speaking accuracy and fluency among EFL learners: The role of creative thinking, emotional intelligence, and academic enthusiasm. Heliyon, 10(18).
  14. Xiao, M., Amzah, F., & Rong, W. (2023). Experience of beauty: valuing emotional engagement and collaboration in teacher-child storytelling activities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 165-187.
  15. Yuniarti, Y., & Yulian, R. (2022). Digital story telling based on multimodal elements on EFL learners’ speaking performance. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(2), 308-316