Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 5 (2025)

Assessing the Numeracy Skills of Grade 2 Students: Basis for Instructional Drill Material Development Program

Jerahmeel Tumaob | Charitte Parazo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the numeracy skills of Grade 2 students and examine the relationship between their demographic characteristics and their numeracy proficiency. A total of 150 students participated, and data were collected regarding their family income level, parent education, and parental occupation. The study found that the majority of students came from families with moderate income levels, and their parents had varying educational backgrounds, with a significant portion having at least a high school education. The students' numeracy proficiency was analyzed, revealing that most scored in the 41%-60% range, indicating moderate numeracy skills. Statistical analysis showed a significant positive correlation between parental education (r = 0.762) and parental occupation (r = 0.605) with the students' numeracy skills, while family income level did not exhibit a significant correlation. Based on these findings, the study recommends the development of targeted instructional drill materials, parent education programs, and numeracy support initiatives to enhance students' numeracy skills. Additionally, it suggests that professional development for teachers and increased parental involvement are essential to improving the numeracy proficiency of Grade 2 students.



References:

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (2021). Human associative memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Bandura, A. (19 86). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Chiu, M.-S., & Khoo, S.-H. (2015). The role of socioeconomic status and family background in explaining the differences in educational achievement. Comparative Education Review, 49(1), 18-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/426888
  4. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2019). Learning and teaching early mathematics: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1504_01
  6. Delos Reyes, C. (2022). Effectiveness of math instructional materials in Pangasinan. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(1), 45-60.
  7. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Pagani, L. S. (2017). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
  8. Garcia, C. A., & Santos, J. L. (2019). Parental involvement and its impact on academic performance in the Philippines. Journal of Philippine Education Research, 12(2), 102-118.
  9. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2017). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411427535
  10. Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2017). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 517-552. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003517
  11. Mayer, R. E. (2016). Applying the science of learning. Pearson.
  12. Mendoza, R. M., & Rojano, E. S. (2020). Numeracy skills among Filipino students: An assessment. Asian Education Studies, 9(3), 215-230.
  13. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). TIMSS 2016 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  14. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2017). TIMSS 2016 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  15. Piaget, J. (19 73). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers.
  16. Rogoff, B. (2017). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (pp. 16-31). Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  17. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (2018). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupil performance. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  18. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2019). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35-53). Routledge.
  19. Sirin, S. R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417.
  20. Villanueva, J. R. (2021). Impact of educational resources on student outcomes in Pangasinan. Local Education Journal, 20(1), 78-91

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic